UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549


SCHEDULE 14A


Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a)

of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(Amendment No.)

Filed by the Registrant [X] Filed by a Party other than the Registrant [ ]
Filed by the Registrant
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant
Check the appropriate Box:
[ ]    Preliminary Proxy Statement
[ ]    Confidential for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
[X]    Definitive Proxy Statement
[ ]    Definitive Additional Materials
[ ]    
Preliminary Proxy Statement
Confidential for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
Definitive Proxy Statement
Definitive Additional Materials
Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12
HomeStreet, Inc.
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
[X] No fee required.
[ ] Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(l) and 0-11.
1) Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if Other Than the Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
No fee required.
Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
Fee computed on table in exhibit required by Item 25(b) per Exchange Act Rules- 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.
2) Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:




3) Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11
(Set forth the amount on which the filing is calculated and state how it was determined):

4) Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
5) Total Fee Paid:
[ ] Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
[ ] Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.
1) Amount Previously Paid:
2) Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
3) Filing Party:
4) Date Filed:







Image_0.jpg
April 22, 201611, 2023
Dear Shareholders:
It is myour distinct pleasure to invite you to attend the 2016 annual meeting2023 Annual Meeting of shareholdersShareholders of HomeStreet, Inc. The meeting will(the “Annual Meeting” or “meeting”) to be held virtually at 1010:00 a.m. Pacific Daylight, Pacific Time, on May 26, 201625, 2023. You will be able to virtually attend the meeting, submit your questions and comments, and vote your shares at the downtown Seattle Hilton Hotel, Windward Room, located at 1301 Sixth Avenue. A mapmeeting by visiting www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/HMST2023. You will also be able to access, through the website during the meeting, a list of shareholders entitled to vote. We believe that a virtual meeting provides expanded access, improved communication and directionscost savings for our shareholders and HomeStreet, Inc. Shareholders will be able to attend and listen to the meeting location can be foundAnnual Meeting live, submit questions and vote their shares electronically at the backAnnual Meeting as more fully explained in this Proxy Statement.
We have elected to deliver our proxy materials to our shareholders over the Internet and will mail to our shareholders a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials containing instructions on how to access our Proxy Statement and our 2022 annual report to shareholders. The Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials also provides instructions on how to vote by telephone or Internet and includes instructions on how to receive a paper copy of the attached proxy statement.
With this letter, we are including the notice for the annual meeting, the proxy statement, our annual report for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015 and a proxy card.materials by mail. You may also find copies of these items online at www.homestreet.com/proxy.http://ir.homestreet.com/sec-filings/proxy-materials/default.aspx.
WeThe matters to be voted on are submitting for your approval three proposals: electiondescribed in the accompanying Notice of three Class II directors, ratification2023 Annual Meeting of the selection of our independent auditors for 2016Shareholders and a shareholder proposal asking for the Company to adopt majority voting in non-contested director elections. TheProxy Statement. Our Board of Directors believes each of the proposals are in the best interests of HomeStreet and its shareholders and accordingly recommends that you vote “FOR”in accordance with each of its recommendations regarding the proposals set forthlisted in the enclosed proxy statement.Notice of 2023 Annual Meeting of Shareholders and described in the accompanying Proxy Statement.
If you would like to receive electronic notification of documents we file with the Securities and Exchange Commission and our issuance of press releases, you may subscribe to our e-mail alerts at http://ir.homestreet.com.
Your vote is important. Whether or not you planexpect to attend the annual meeting,Annual Meeting, we hopeencourage you willto read the Proxy Statement and vote as soon as possible so thatby telephone, Internet or submit your signed and dated proxy card to ensure your representation at the Annual Meeting. For specific instructions on how to vote your shares, are represented. We urge youplease refer to complete, signthe section entitled “Information About the Annual Meeting” beginning on page 6 of the proxy statement and datethe instructions on the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials.Providing voting instructions or returning your proxy card and promptly return it in advance of the postage-paid envelope provided or vote using the internet or telephone. Returning your proxy cardmeeting will not prevent you from voting in person,on the website during the meeting but will ensure that your vote is counted if you are unable to attend.
Thank you for your ongoing support of and continued interest in HomeStreet, Inc.

Mark K. Mason
Chairman of the Board, President and CEO







Sincerely,
Mason Signature.gif
Mark K. Mason
Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
to be Held on May 26, 2016
Paterson Signature.gif
Mark R. Patterson
Lead Independent Director


The




Image_3.jpg

NOTICE OF 2023 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
To Be Held Thursday, May 25, 2023, 10:00 a.m. (Pacific Time)
Virtual Meeting Only — No Physical Meeting Location

To Our Shareholders:
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the 2023 Annual Meeting of shareholders (the “Annual Meeting”Shareholders ("Annual Meeting") of HomeStreet, Inc., a Washington corporation (the “Company”), will be held in a virtual-only format, via live webcast, on Thursday, May 25, 2023 at 10:00 a.m., Pacific Daylight Time, on May 26, 2016, in the Windward Room (Pacific Time). The purpose of the Hilton Hotel, 1301 Sixth Avenue, Seattle, Washington 98101 in orderthis meeting is to consider and vote upon the following proposals:matters:
1.To elect three (3) Class II directors to serve until the 2019 annual meeting of shareholders, or until their successors are elected, and qualified;
2.To ratify the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2016;
3.A proposal by a shareholder of the Company asking the Company to adopt majority voting in non-contested director elections; and
4.To transact such other business that may properly come before the Annual Meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereto.
1.The election of seven directors to our Board of Directors to serve until the 2024 annual meeting of shareholders, or until their respective successors are elected and qualified;
2.The approval on an advisory (non-binding) basis of the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers; and
3.The ratification on an advisory (non-binding) basis of the appointment of Crowe LLP ("Crowe") as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2023.
The foregoing items of business are more fully described in the Proxy Statement accompanying this Notice of 2023 Annual Meeting of Shareholders. We also will transact any other business that may properly come before the Annual Meeting, but we are not aware of any such additional matters.
Only shareholders of record at the close of business on April 21, 2016,March 31, 2023, are entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the meetingAnnual Meeting or any adjournment or postponement of the meeting. The accompanying Proxy Statement and an opportunity to vote.
We are requesting that you provide the Board of Directors your vote prior to the meeting by completing and returning the enclosed proxy card as soon as possible. Additionally, we hope thatwere either made available to you canonline or mailed to you beginning on or about April 11, 2023.

We have adopted a virtual format for the Annual Meeting to provide a safe, consistent and convenient experience to all shareholders regardless of location. You will be able to virtually attend the meeting, in person. If you submit your proxyquestions and later wish to change your vote you may do so, either by submitting a new proxy or by voting in person at the meeting. If you are unable to attendcomments during the meeting, and vote in person, pleaseyour shares at the meeting by visiting www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/HMST2023.
Whether or not you expect to attend the annual meeting, we encourage you to read the Proxy Statement and vote by telephone or by Internet or submit ayour proxy card or voting instructions as soon as possible, so that your shares canmay be votedrepresented at the meeting in accordance with your instructions. Please submit your proxy by mail, or vote using the internet or telephone in accordance with themeeting. For specific instructions set forth in the enclosed proxy card. Pleaseon how to vote your shares, please refer to the questions and answers section commencingentitled “Information About the Annual Meeting” beginning on page 26 of the attached proxy statementaccompanying Proxy Statement and the instructions on the corresponding proxy card.Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials.
Our Mailing Address:
HomeStreet, Inc.
601 Union Street, Suite 2000
Seattle, WA 98101

Godfrey B. Evans
Executive Vice President, General Counsel,
Chief Administrative Officer
and Corporate Secretary
April 22, 2016




Table of Contents
Evans Signature.gif
Godfrey B. Evans
DATE, TIME, PLACE AND PURPOSE OF HOMESTREET'S ANNUAL MEETING1Executive Vice President, General Counsel,
Chief Administrative Officer and Corporate Secretary
April 11, 2023





Image_5.jpg
PROXY STATEMENT FOR THE 2023 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
TO BE HELD ON MAY 25, 2023


QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE PROXY MATERIALS AND ANNUAL MEETING2PAGE
Why am I receiving these materials?PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY
2
Who is entitled to vote?INFORMATION ABOUT THE ANNUAL MEETING
2
Who is a shareholder of record?
2
How many shares are entitled to vote at the meeting?
2
How many votes do I have?
2
What proposals will be voted on at the Annual Meeting?
2
What is the voting requirement to approve each of the proposals?
2
How does the Board of Directors recommend I vote?
3
How long will each of the directors elected at the Annual Meeting continue to serve?
3
How do I vote?
3
You may vote by mail
3
You may vote in person at the meeting
3
You may vote on the Internet
3
You may vote by Telephone
3
What if my shares are held in street name?
3
What happens if I sign and return my proxy card, but don't mark my votes?
4
Can I revoke my proxy?
4
What happens if additional matters are presented at the Annual Meeting?
4
Is my vote confidential?
4
Who will count the votes?
4
Where can I find the results of the Annual Meeting?
5
What does it mean if I get more than one proxy card?
5
What constitutes a “quorum”?
5
How are abstentions and broker non-votes treated?
5
What percentage of outstanding shares do the directors and executive officers own?
5
Who is paying the cost of preparing, assembling and mailing the notices of the Annual Meeting, Proxy Statement and form of proxy and the solicitation of the proxies?
5
What is the deadline for submitting shareholder proposals for consideration at the Company's next annual meeting of the shareholders or to nominate individuals to serve as directors?
5
Who can help answer any other questions I may have?
6
7
7
7
Board RecommendationKey Qualifications
7
Information Regarding the Board of Directors and Nominees
8
Directors of HomeStreet, Inc.
8
Nominees for Election as Directors at the Annual Meeting
8
Directors Continuing in Office
9



PROPOSAL 2 RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED
PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRMSHAREHOLDER ENGAGEMENT
12
12
12
Pre-Approval of Audit and Non-Audit ServicesOngoing Shareholder Engagement
12
Board Recommendation13
PROPOSAL 3 SHAREHOLDER PROPOSAL FOR MAJORITY VOTING IN NON-
CONTESTED ELECTIONS OF DIRECTORSCORPORATE GOVERNANCE
14
Introduction14
14
Statement of Shareholder Regarding Proposal Whistleblower Policy
14
Board Recommendation
14
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
16
Code of Ethics
16
Compliance with Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act
16
16
16
17
17
17
17
18
18
19
Human Resources and Corporate GovernanceCompensation Committee
19
Interaction with ConsultantsNominating and Governance Committee
20
Human Resources and Corporate Governance Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
21
Process for Recommending Candidates for Election to the Board of Directors
21
22


i


PAGE
22
22
22
Current Non-Employee Director Compensation32
22
Directors' Deferred Compensation Plan
23
Compensation for Employee Directors
23
Director Compensation Table
23
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
25
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
28
Compensation Program Objectives and Philosophy
28
Decision Making and Policy Making
28
Summary Components of Compensation
29
Base Salary
29
Short-Term Incentive Compensation
29



Incentive Plan Risk ManagementEXECUTIVE OFFICERS
31
Equity Incentive CompensationCOMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
32
32
32
Executive Deferred CompensationClawback Provisions
33
33
Perquisites and other Personal Benefits401(k) Savings Plan
33
33
and Severance and Change in Control ArrangementsAgreements
35
Human Resources and Corporate Governance Committees ReportCOMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT
35
Summary Compensation Table2022 SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE
36
Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year EndPOTENTIAL PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATION OR CHANGE IN CONTROL
37
.

ii


PAGE
38
Loan TransactionsLoans
38
38
Consulting Agreement with Affiliate of Mr. Chrisman38
38
39
INFORMATION REGARDING EQUITY COMPENSATION PLANSOTHER MATTERS
42
AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORTParticipants in the Solicitation
43
44
IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THE AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALSShareholders Sharing the Same Address
44
DIRECTIONS AND PARKING INSTRUCTIONS TO HOMESTREET, INC. ANNUAL MEETINGAppraisal Rights
45



iii




HOMESTREET, INC.
601 Union Street, Suite 2000
Seattle, WA 98101

PROXY STATEMENT
ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

to be Held May 26, 2016 SUMMARY

DATE, TIME, PLACE AND PURPOSE OF HOMESTREET’S ANNUAL MEETING

The 2016 annual meeting of shareholders ofThis summary highlights information about HomeStreet, Inc., a Washington corporation (the “Company” or “HomeStreet”) will be held at 10:00 a.m., Pacific Daylight Time, on May 26, 2016, in the Windward Room of the Hilton Hotel, 1301 Sixth Avenue, Seattle, Washington 98101. References to the “Annual Meeting”and certain information contained elsewhere in this Proxy Statement. It does not contain all the information that you should consider in connection with the matters before the Annual Meeting. Please read the entire Proxy Statement include any postponements or adjournments of such meeting. At the meeting,carefully before voting your shares. For more complete information regarding the Company’s shareholders will be asked2022 performance, please review the Company’s 2022 annual report to approveshareholders. Websites referenced throughout this Proxy Statement are provided for convenience only, and the content on the referenced websites does not constitute a proposal to elect three Class II nomineespart of, and is not incorporated by reference into, this Proxy Statement.
THE ANNUAL MEETING

DateMay 25, 2023
Time10:00 a.m. Pacific Time
PlaceThe Annual Meeting will be held as a virtual-only meeting, which can be accessed at
www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/HMST2023
Record DateMarch 31, 2023
Voting
Shareholders of record at the close of business on the Record Date are entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting. As of the Record Date, 18,767,811 shares of our common stock were issued, outstanding and entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting. Each Share of our common stock is entitled to one vote for each director nominee and one vote for each of the proposals. For more information on voting, virtually attending the Annual Meeting and other meeting information, please see “Information About the Annual Meeting” on page 6 of this Proxy Statement.
VOTING MATTERS AND VOTE RECOMMENDATIONS
Unanimous Board
Recommendation
See Page
Proposal 1: Election of seven directors
FOR
the Board’s nominees
Proposal 2: Approval on an advisory (non-binding) basis of the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers
FOR
73
Proposal 3: Ratification on an advisory (non-binding) basis of the appointment of our independent registered public accounting firm for 2023
FOR
75

OUR DIRECTOR NOMINEES

Our Board of Directors (the “Board”) is currently comprised of eight directors, seven of whom are nominated and standing for election at the Annual Meeting. You are therefore being asked to elect seven directors this year to serve a one-year term on the Board until the 2024 annual meeting of shareholders, until their respective successors are duly elected and qualified, or until their earlier death, resignation or removal. For more information about the background and qualifications of the director nominees and the entire Board, please see “Proposal 1 — Election of Directors” on page 12 of this Proxy Statement. The Board’s nominees are:
1



NameAgeTenureCommittees
Mark K. Mason6313 yearsExecutive Chair
Scott M. Boggs6811 yearsAudit, Enterprise Risk Management, Executive
Sandra A. Cavanaugh684 yearsCompensation Chair, Enterprise Risk Management, Executive, Nominating and Governance
Jeffrey D. Green592 yearsAudit Chair, Nominating and Governance
Joanne R. Harrell681 yearNominating & Governance Chair, Enterprise Risk Management, Compensation
James R. Mitchell, Jr.733 yearsAudit, Compensation, Nominating and Governance
Nancy D. Pellegrino663 yearsEnterprise Risk Management Chair, Compensation, Nominating and Governance
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE HIGHLIGHTS
ü Lead Independent Director with clearly defined responsibilities
ü Seven of eight current directors are independent
ü Each Board committee, other than the Executive Committee, is comprised of independent directors
ü Average director tenure of director nominees is 5.3 years
ü Average age of director nominees is 66
ü     Board diversity policy
ü Directors can be removed without “cause”
ü Shareholders with at least 10% of outstanding shares are permitted to call a special meeting of shareholders
ü Majority voting standard for uncontested director elections with a director resignation policy
ü No supermajority shareholder meetingvote requirements in 2019, to ratify the selectionArticles of Deloitte & Touche LLP asIncorporation
ü Annual election of directors
ü Board policy limits director membership on other public company boards
ü Regular Board, committee and director evaluations
ü Regular comprehensive succession planning for management
ü Each current director attended at least 75% of the meetings of the Board and the committees on which the director served in 2022
ü Policies prohibiting hedging of the Company’s independent registered public accounting firmsecurities
ü Meaningful stock ownership and retention guidelines for directors
2



SHAREHOLDER ENGAGEMENT OVERVIEW

The Board welcomes feedback from shareholders on our Board composition, governance practices and policies, executive compensation framework and other appropriate matters related to our strategy and performance. We routinely provide opportunities for our shareholders to connect with our leadership team. Members of our management team regularly attend investor and industry conferences where they are able to engage with active managers of hedge funds and mutual funds who are investors or potential investors in HomeStreet. We also routinely attend ad hoc meetings with current or prospective investors. We encourage you to visit our investor relations website at http://ir.homestreet.com to learn more about the Company. Shareholders can also find our Shareholder Engagement Procedures and Practices on our investor relations website, which provides guidelines for how shareholders can communicate with our Board.

3


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION HIGHLIGHTS
2022 Executive Compensation

Average base salary increase for the yeartop five NEOs was 3.0%
The Company did not pay out the performance shares units (“PSUs”) granted in 2020 for the three-year measurement period ending December 31, 2016, and to vote2022 as the minimum performance objectives were not achieved
Used independent, external compensation consultant for advice in making compensation program decisions
Conducted annual risk review of incentive compensation programs

Summary of Executive Compensation Practices
What We DoWhat We Don’t Do
üOffer to engage with shareholders and consider shareholder input in designing our executive pay programsûNo short-selling or hedging of Company’s securities permitted by our insider trading policy, which applies to directors, officers, employees and consultants
üShort-term incentives that are designed to align with short-term objectivesûNo employment arrangements that provide for guaranteed salary increases or non-performance-based cash incentive awards for executive officers
üLong-term performance-based equity incentive awards that are designed to align with long-term objectives and create shareholder valueûNo supplemental executive retirement plans
üSubstantial portion of compensation opportunity is at-riskûNo “golden parachute” excise tax gross ups in employment agreements
üOur CEO’s and other NEOs’ annual equity awards generally vest over a three-year periodûNo repricing, buyout or exchange of underwater stock options
üRetain an independent, external compensation consultantûNo excessive perquisites
üClawback features are incorporated into the short-term annual cash incentive programs for all executive officersûNo single trigger vesting of equity awards in the event of a change of control
üUse of multiple performance measures and caps on potential incentive paymentsûNo excessive severance arrangements providing for payments exceeding 3 times base salary plus target/average/most recent bonus
üMinimum one-year vesting period required for 95% of share-based awards granted under our Amended and Restated 2014 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2014 Plan”)ûNo liberal change in control provisions in the 2014 Plan and executive employment agreements
üAnnual risk review of incentive compensation programsûNo dividends paid on unvested performance shares or units

4


HOMESTREET, INC.
________________
PROXY STATEMENT FOR THE 2023 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
TO BE HELD ON MAY 25, 2023
_________________

April 11, 2023
INFORMATION ABOUT SOLICITATION AND VOTING
The accompanying proxy is solicited on a shareholder proposal seeking a change in our charter documents to require a majority vote of all shares cast at a meeting to elect each director in any non-contested election of directors. This Proxy Statement is first being sent to the shareholdersbehalf of the Company onBoard of Directors of HomeStreet, Inc. (the “Company” or about April 21, 2016, and is accompanied by a proxy card that is being solicited by the Company“HomeStreet”) for use at the Company’s 2023 Annual Meeting.Meeting of shareholders (the “Annual Meeting” or “meeting”) to be held on May 25, 2023 at 10:00 a.m. Pacific Time as a virtual-only meeting which can be accessed
Unless otherwise specified, all ownership interestsat www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/HMST2023.
INTERNET AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS
Under rules adopted by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), we are furnishing proxy materials to our shareholders primarily via the internet, instead of mailing printed copies of those materials to each shareholder. On or voting power referenced herein, either in percentage termsabout April 11, 2023, we expect to send our shareholders a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (“Notice of Internet Availability”) containing instructions on how to access our proxy materials, including our Proxy Statement and our 2022 annual report to shareholders. The Notice of Internet Availability also provides instructions on how to vote by telephone or number of shares, in respectby Internet and includes instructions on how to receive a paper copy of the Company’s outstanding shares, have been calculated in accordance with Rule 13d-3 underproxy materials by mail. If you prefer to receive printed proxy materials, please follow the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) as reflectedinstructions included in the beneficial ownership table shown in the “Principal Shareholders” section elsewhere in this Proxy Statement.

Notice of Internet Availability.


QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS
5


INFORMATION ABOUT THE PROXY MATERIALS AND ANNUAL MEETING


1.Why am I receiving these materials?
Our Board of Directors (the “Board”) has sent you thisthe Notice of Internet Availability and accompanying Proxy Statement and the accompanying proxy card to ask for your vote, as a shareholder of HomeStreet, on certain matters that will be voted on at the Annual Meeting. As a shareholder, of record, you are invited to virtually attend the Annual Meeting and are entitled to and requested to vote on the proposals set forth in this Proxy Statement. The reasons for, and furtherFor more information in relation to, each of these proposals are described in more detailon the participants in the questions and answers and other materials that follow.Board’s solicitation, please see “Participants in the Solicitation” on page 83 of this Proxy Statement.

2.Who is entitled to vote?
All shareholders of record of HomeStreetHomeStreet’s common stock at the close of business on April 21, 2016March 31, 2023 (the “Record Date”) are entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the Annual Meeting.
Who is a shareholder of record?
A shareholder of record is a person or entity whose name appears on or in our records as an owner of one or more shares of our common stock as of the close of business on the Record Date.
3.How many shares are entitled to vote at the meeting?
As of the Record Date, 24,556,153.618,767,811 shares of our common stock were issued, outstanding and entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting.

4.How many votes do I have?
Each share of common sharestock you owned of record on the Record Date is entitled to one vote for each director candidate. You may NOT cumulate votes relating to the election of directors. For the other proposalsmatters presented at this meeting, you are entitled to one vote for each share of common sharestock you owned of record on the Record Date.
What proposals will be voted on at
5.Who is a registered shareholder and who is a beneficial shareholder?
Registered Shareholders: A “registered shareholder” is a person or entity whose name appears in the Annual Meeting?
The proposals scheduledCompany’s registered list of shareholders as an owner of one or more shares of the Company’s common stock. If you are a registered shareholder, the Notice of Internet Availability, proxy card or voting instruction are being sent directly to be voted on atyou and you are invited to virtually attend the Annual Meeting are:through the website for the meeting using the control number provided on your Notice of Internet Availability, proxy card or voting instruction materials.
The electionBeneficial Shareholders: A “beneficial shareholder” is a person or entity whose shares of the three Class II directors listedCompany’s common stock are held by a bank, broker or other nominee (a.k.a. in this Proxy Statement“street name”). Most holders of our common stock hold their shares beneficially through a bank, broker or other nominee rather than of record directly in their own name. If you are a beneficial shareholder, the Notice of Internet Availability, proxy card or voting instruction materials are being forwarded to serve for a termyou by your bank, broker or other nominee who is considered the registered shareholder of three yearsthose shares. As the beneficial owner, you have the right to direct your bank, broker or until their respective successors are duly elected and qualified;
The ratification of Deloitte & Touche LLP as HomeStreet’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2016; and
A shareholder proposal seeking a change in our articles of incorporation and bylawsother nominee on how to establish a majority voting standard in non-contested director elections.
What is the voting requirement to approve each of the proposals?

ProposalVote RequiredBroker Discretionary
Voting Allowed
Proposal 1: Election of DirectorsPlurality of votes castNo
Proposal 2: Ratification of appointment of independent registered public accounting firm
Number of votes cast in favor exceed number of votes cast against

Yes
Proposal 3: Shareholder proposal seeking majority voting in non-contested director electionsNumber of votes cast in favor exceed number of votes cast againstNo


How does the Board of Directors recommend I vote?
Our Board recommends that you vote your shares:
“FOR” the three director nominees;
“FOR” the ratification of appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as HomeStreet’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2016;shares and
“FOR” the shareholder proposal seeking majority voting for non-contested director elections.
How long will each of the directors elected at you are also invited to virtually attend the Annual Meeting continue to serve?
Our Articlesthrough the website for the meeting using the control number provided on your Notice of Incorporation provide that our directors will serve a term of three years or until their respective successors are duly elected and qualified. Our Board is divided into three classes of directors, with each class serving a three-year term. Typically at each annual meeting, our shareholders elect directors within one class, and each class is staggered in a manner that causes approximately one-third of our total number of directors to be elected annually, an arrangement commonly known as a staggered board. However, our Articles of Incorporation also provide that if the number of directors is changed, the classes shall be apportioned among the groups so as to maintain the number of directors in each group as nearly equal as possible. In addition, if a new director is appointed to the Board by the directors, that individual must stand for election by the shareholders at our next annual meeting. The three director nominees for Class II will, if elected, serve until the 2019 annual meeting.
How do I vote?
You can vote on matters that properly come before the Annual Meeting in one of four ways:
You may vote by mail.
You do this by marking, signing and dating theInternet Availability, proxy card and mailing itor voting instruction materials. Your bank, broker or other nominee has provided a voting instruction form for you to use in the enclosed, prepaid and addressed envelope or otherwise mailing it to us at our mailing address on the cover page of this Proxy Statement prior to the Annual Meeting. If you mark your voting instructions on the proxy card, your shares will be voted as you instruct.
You may vote in person at the meeting.
You can vote in person at the meeting. However, if you hold your shares in street name (in the name of a bank or some other nominee), you must request and receive a legal proxy from the record owner prior to the meeting in orderdirecting how to vote at the meeting.your shares.
In order to facilitate an orderly Annual Meeting, we request that you provide the Board your vote prior to the Annual Meeting by completing and returning the enclosed proxy card as soon as possible.
You may vote on the Internet.
Go to www.voteproxy.com and follow the instructions. You should have your proxy card, including your control number, in hand when you access the website.
You may vote by Telephone.
Call the toll-free number listed on the proxy card from any touch-tone telephone and follow the instructions. You should have your proxy card, including your control number, in hand when you call.
If you own your shares through a brokerage account or in other nominee form, you should follow the instructions you receive from the record holder with regard to which voting methods are available.
What if my shares are held in street name?
If you are the beneficial owner of shares held by a broker in street name, your broker, as the record holder of the shares, is required to vote the shares in accordance with your instructions.Under certain circumstances banks, brokers and brokersother nominees are prohibited from exercising discretionary authority for beneficial owners who have not provided voting


instructions to the bank, broker or broker,other nominee, which is referred to as a “broker non-vote.”non-vote”. In these cases, those shares will be counted for the purpose of determining whether a quorum is present. Pursuant to applicable regulations, if you do not give instructions to your bank, broker or other nominee, your bank, broker or other nominee will not be permitted to vote your shares with respect to Proposal 1, Election of Directors, or Proposal 3, Shareholder Proposal2, Approval on an Advisory (Non-Binding) Basis of the Compensation of the Company’s Named Executive Officers.

6


6.What is a proxy?
A proxy is your legal designation of another person to vote the stock you own. That other person is called a proxy. If you designate someone as your proxy in a written document, that document is also called a proxy or a proxy card. We have designated Godfrey B. Evans, our Corporate Secretary, General Counsel and Chief Administrative Officer, and Mark K. Mason, our Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, as the Company’s proxies for Majority Votingthe Annual Meeting.

7.How do I vote?
Registered Shareholders: If you are a “registered shareholder,” you can vote your shares in the following four ways:
By Internet: Visit the website shown on your Notice of Internet Availability, proxy card or voting instruction materials to vote via the Internet (www.proxyvote.com);
By Telephone: Use the toll-free telephone number shown on your Notice of Internet Availability, proxy card or voting instruction materials to vote by telephone;
By Mail: If you received proxy materials by mail, you can vote by submitting a proxy by mail by completing, signing and dating your proxy card and mailing it using the postage pre-paid envelope that was enclosed with your proxy materials. Note that you cannot vote by marking the Notice of Internet Availability and returning it. The Notice of Internet Availability provides instruction on how to vote via the Internet and how to request paper copies of the proxy materials.
At the Annual Meeting: If you virtually attend the Annual Meeting through the website provided using the control number from your Notice of Internet Availability, proxy card or voting instruction materials, you may vote your shares associated with that control number online during the Annual Meeting. However, you are encouraged to read the Proxy Statement and vote by telephone or by Internet or complete, sign and date your proxy card and mail it using the postage pre-paid envelope that was enclosed with your proxy materials regardless of whether you plan to attend the Annual Meeting to ensure your vote is counted.
Beneficial Shareholders: If you are a “beneficial shareholder,” then you will receive voting instructions from your bank, broker or other nominee on how you may vote your shares, which will include a control number that you can use to virtually attend the Annual Meeting on the website www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/HSMT2023.
For more information, please see “Information about the Annual Meeting — How do I virtually attend and participate in the Annual Meeting” on page 9 of this Proxy Statement.

8.What should I do if I receive more than one proxy card or set of proxy materials from the Company?
Your shares may be owned through more than one brokerage or other share ownership account. In order to vote all of the shares that you own, you must either sign and return all of the proxy cards or follow the instructions for Directorsany alternative voting procedure on each of the proxy cards that you receive.
Please note that if you have more than one account through which you hold shares, you will receive more than one control number. The control number is used to vote your shares, and is also used to log on to the meeting website to virtually attend the meeting, which will allow you to vote the shares held in Non-Contested Elections, asthe account associated with that control number at the meeting. However, you will not be able to vote shares held in other accounts not associated with the control number you are using to log in to the virtual shareholder meeting. Therefore, it is important that you return your proxy cards for all of your accounts prior to the Annual Meeting so that all of your shares may be counted.

7


9.Can I revoke my proxy?
Yes. You can revoke your proxy and/or change your vote at any time prior to the Annual Meeting. Only your latest dated voting instructions or proxy will count.
Registered Shareholders: If you are a “registered shareholder” who has properly executed and delivered a proxy, you may revoke such proxy at any time before the Annual Meeting in any of the following ways:
submitting another proxy with a later date by telephone or by Internet or by signing, dating and returning your proxy card using the instructions on your proxy card;
sending a written notice of revocation to our Corporate Secretary at HomeStreet, Inc., 601 Union Street, Suite 2000, Seattle, Washington 98101; or
voting online during the Annual Meeting at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/HMST2023.
Beneficial Shareholders: If you are a “beneficial shareholder,” you may change your vote by submitting new voting instructions to your bank, broker or nominee in accordance with such bank, broker or nominee’s procedures. You can use your control number to log into and virtually attend the Annual Meeting and change your vote during the meeting.

10.How will my shares be voted if I return the proxy card?
The shares represented by any proxy card that is properly executed and received by the Company prior to or at the Annual Meeting will be voted in accordance with the specifications made on that proxy card. Where a choice has been specified on the proxy card with respect to the proposals, the shares represented by the proxy card will be voted in accordance with the specifications.
The Board is not aware of any matters that are expected to come before the Annual Meeting other than those described in this Proxy Statement.
If your shares are held in street name, you will need proof of ownership toany other matter should be admitted to the Annual Meeting. A recent brokerage statement or a letter from the record holder of your shares is an example of proof of ownership. If you want to vote your shares of common stock held in street name in personpresented at the Annual Meeting youupon which a vote may be properly taken, shares represented by the proxy cards received by the Board will have to get a writtenbe voted with respect thereto at the discretion of the person or persons named as proxies in the enclosed proxy in your name from the broker, bank or other nominee who holds your shares.card.

11.What happens if I sign and return my proxy card, but don’t mark my votes?

If you return a validly executed proxy card without indicating how your shares should be voted on a matter and you do not revoke your proxy, your proxy will be voted: “FOR” the election of the seven director nominees of the Board set forth on the proxy card (Proposal 1); “FOR” the approval on an advisory (non-binding) basis of the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers as described in the Proxy Statement under “Executive Compensation” (Proposal 2); and “FOR” the ratification on an advisory (non-binding) basis of the appointment of Crowe as the independent registered public accounting firm of the Company for 2023 (Proposal 3).

12.Will my shares be voted if I do nothing?

If your shares are registered in your name, you must sign and return a proxy card in order for your shares to be voted, unless you vote by telephone or by Internet or vote online during the Annual Meeting. If your shares are held in “street name” (that is, held for your account by a bank, broker or other nominee) and you do not instruct your bank, broker or other nominee how to vote your shares, your bank, broker or other nominee may not have discretionary authority to vote your shares on with respect to the election of directors (Proposal 1) or the approval on an advisory (non-binding) basis of the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers (Proposal 2). If you do not markinstruct your vote on your proxy, Scott Boggs, Lead Independent Director, and Godfrey B. Evans, our Corporate Secretary, General Counsel and Chief Administrative Officer, willbank, broker or other nominee as to how to vote your shares as recommended by the Board: FOR eachand your bank, broker or other nominee does not have discretionary voting authority, these unvoted shares will be “broker non-votes”. Banks, brokers or other nominees generally may only exercise discretionary voting authority to vote “routine” proposals. The ratification on an advisory (non-binding basis) of the director nominees identified herein, FOR the ratificationappointment of our independent auditorsregistered public accounting firm for 2023 (Proposal 3) is the only routine proposal to be presented at the Annual Meeting. If banks, brokers or other nominees exercise this discretionary voting
8


authority on Proposal 3, such shares will be considered present at the Annual Meeting for determining whether a quorum is present.
YOUR VOTE IS VERY IMPORTANT.  To assure that your shares are represented at the Annual Meeting, we ask you to vote by telephone or by Internet by following the instructions on the Notice of Internet Availability, proxy card or voting instruction materials or by completing, signing and FORdating your proxy card and promptly mailing it in the shareholder proposal for majority voting for directors in non-contested elections.
Can I revoke my proxy?
postage-paid envelope enclosed with your proxy materials, whether or not you plan to virtually attend the Annual Meeting. You have the power tocan revoke your proxy at any time before the polls closeproxy or proxies you appointed cast your votes.

13.How do I virtually attend and participate in the Annual Meeting?
The meeting webcast on May 25, 2023 will begin promptly at 10:00 a.m. Pacific Time. We encourage you to access the meeting prior to the start time. Online check-in will begin at 9:45 a.m. Pacific Time, and you should allow ample time for the check-in procedures.
Only HomeStreet shareholders or their duly authorized and constituted proxies may virtually attend the Annual Meeting. You may do this by either:
a.submitting another proxy with a later date prior to the date of the Annual Meeting, over the internet, by telephone or to our Corporate Secretary, Godfrey B. Evans, at our mailing address on the cover page of this Proxy Statement, or
b.sending a written notice of your revocation to our Corporate Secretary at our mailing address on the cover page of this Proxy Statement, or
c.voting in person at the Annual Meeting.
What happens if additional mattersThe control number printed on your Notice of Internet Availability, proxy card or voting instruction materials is required to virtually attend the meeting through the website at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/HMST2023 regardless of whether you are presented ata registered shareholder or a beneficial shareholder. We have been advised that Google Chrome and Microsoft Edge browsers will give the best user experience for participation in the virtual meeting.
Our Chairman and CEO is expected to lead the meeting, and members of our Board are expected to be present and available during the Annual Meeting?
If any other matters are properly presented for consideration atMeeting. During the Annual Meeting, you will be able to hear the business of the meeting as it is conducted, vote your shares if you have not already done so, access information that would normally be available at an in-person annual meeting, including among other things, considerationthe list of a motionshareholders entitled to adjournvote at the meeting, and submit questions to be answered by our Chairman of the Board. Questions pertinent to meeting matters will be answered during the meeting, subject to time constraints, and additional instructions regarding the question and answer period of the Annual Meeting to another time or place (including, without limitation, for the purpose of soliciting additional proxies), the persons named as proxy holders, Scott Boggs and Godfrey B. Evans, will have discretion to vote on those matters in accordance with their best judgment. We do not currently anticipate that any other matters will be raisedposted on the virtual meeting website.
The virtual Annual Meeting has been designed to provide the same rights to participate as you would have at an in-person meeting. Shareholders participating in the virtual Annual Meeting.
Is my vote confidential?
Proxy instructions, ballots and voting tabulations that identify an individual shareholder are handledMeeting will be in a manner that protects your voting privacy. Your votelisten-only mode and will not be disclosed either withinable to speak during the Company orwebcast. However, in order to third parties, except: (1) as necessary to meet applicable legal requirements, (2) to allow formaintain the tabulation of votes and certificationinteractive nature of the votevirtual meeting, virtual attendees are able submit questions before and (3) to facilitateduring the meeting through the virtual meeting portal. To submit a successful proxy solicitation. If you provide written comments onquestion, log into the virtual meeting platform at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/HMST2023, type your proxy card, such commentsquestion into the “Ask a Question” field, and click “Submit.” Questions and answers may be forwardedgrouped by topic and substantially similar questions may be grouped and answered once. In order to promote fairness and efficient use of time, we will respond to up to two questions from a single shareholder and may not be able to respond to all questions.
Our virtual Annual Meeting website will be hosted by Broadridge. In the event you have any technical difficulties logging into the meeting, support from Broadridge will be available. For more information, please go to the Company’s management, however, there can be no guarantee that such commentsvirtual Annual Meeting website, where you will be forwarded or reviewed. We encourage any shareholders who would likeable to provide comments to management to contact us directly at the address providedfind additional information on the cover page of this Proxy Statement.technical support matters.
Who will count the votes?
American Stock Transfer and Trust Company, LLC, our stock transfer agent will serve as the inspector of elections and in that capacity will count and tabulate the votes.


Where can I find the results of the Annual Meeting?
We intend to announce preliminary voting results at the Annual Meeting and will publish final results in a Current Report on Form 8-K, which we will file with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) within four (4) business days after the Annual Meeting.
What does it mean if I get more than one proxy card?
It means that your shares may be owned through more than one brokerage or other share ownership account. Please mark, sign and return all proxy cards to ensure that all your shares are voted.
14.What constitutes a “quorum”?
A “quorum” refers to the number of shares that must be represented at a meeting in order to lawfully conduct business. A majority of the outstanding shares of common sharesstock entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting, present in person as a logged-in participant of the Annual Meeting or represented by proxy, will constitute a quorum for the transaction of business at the Annual Meeting. Votes withheld, abstentions and broker non-votes will be counted as present or represented for purposes of determining the presence or absence of a quorum for the Annual Meeting. Without a quorum, no business may be transacted at the Annual Meeting. However, whether or notIf less than a quorum exists,of the outstanding shares is represented at the Annual Meeting, a majority of the voting power of those present at the Annual Meetingshares so represented may adjourn the Annual Meeting without further notice.

9


15.What vote is required to another date, time and place.approve each of the matters to be voted on at the Annual Meeting?
How are
ProposalVote RequiredBroker
Discretionary
Voting
Proposal 1: Election of seven directors
Majority of votes cast *No
Proposal 2: Approval on an advisory (non-binding) basis of the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers
Number of votes cast in favor exceeds number of votes cast againstNo
Proposal 3: Ratification on an advisory (non-binding) basis of the appointment of our independent registered public accounting firm for 2023
Number of votes cast in favor exceeds number of votes cast againstYes
*    Under the Bylaws, the voting standard in an uncontested election is a majority vote standard. See “What vote is required to elect directors?” below.

16.What is the effect of abstentions and broker non-votes?

If you specify that you wish to “abstain” from voting on an item (or “withhold” your vote for a director), then your shares will not be voted on that particular item. Abstentions and broker non-votes treated?are not considered “votes cast” and so are not counted either “for” or “against” any proposal that requires a majority of votes cast in order to pass, which includes all of the proposals being presented at the Annual Meeting (including the non-contested election of directors).

17.What vote is required to elect directors?

Our Bylaws provide that, in any election of directors that is not a “contested election” (as defined in our Bylaws and described below), the candidates elected are those receiving a majority of the votes cast. Therefore, to be elected, the number of votes cast “FOR” a nominee must exceed the number of votes cast “AGAINST” that nominee.

The term of any director nominee who is a director at the time of election and who does not receive a majority of votes cast in the election held under the majority voting standard described above terminates on the earliest to occur of: (i) 90 days after the date on which the voting results of the election are determined; (ii) the date the director’s resignation is accepted by the Board; or (iii) the date the Board fills the position. The following will not be votes cast and will have no effect on the election of any director nominee: (i) a share whose ballot is marked as “withheld”; (ii) a share otherwise present at the meeting but for which there is an abstention; and (iii) a share otherwise present at the meeting as to which a shareholder gives no authority or direction (other than a share voted pursuant to a signed proxy card on which the shareholder has not indicated any voting direction). Broker non-votes will have no effect on the outcome of this proposal. Shareholders may not cumulate their votes in the election of directors.

Our Bylaws provide that an election is considered “contested,” and will be held under a plurality standard, if (a) the Secretary of the Company receives a notice that a shareholder has nominated a person for election to the Board in compliance with the advance notice requirements for shareholder nominees set forth in Section 1.13 of our Bylaws who are not withdrawn by the advance notice deadline set forth in that section and (b) the Board has not determined before the notice of meeting is given that the shareholder’s nominee(s) do not create a bona fide election contest. No such shareholder notice was received by the Company in advance of this Annual Meeting.

10


18.What vote is required to approve on an advisory (non-binding) basis, the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers and the ratification of the appointment of our independent registered public accountants for 2023?
Each of the proposals to approve, on an advisory (non-binding) basis, the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers and the appointment of Crowe as HomeStreet’s independent registered public accounting firm for 2023 will be adopted if a majority of the votes present in person or by proxy and voting on such matter are cast “for” the proposal. You may vote “for,” “against” or “abstain” from approving the proposal. Abstentions and broker non-votes will be counted forhave no effect on the purpose of determining the presence or absence of a quorum for the transaction of business. At present, the election of directors requires that the candidates elected receive a plurality of votes, which means that the three candidates receiving the largest number of votes cast for the Class II director positions will be elected. Because eachoutcome of the other proposals –proposal.

19.Who will count the approvalvotes?
Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. will serve as the independent inspector of election and, in such capacity, will count and tabulate the ratification of the selection of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016 and the approval of a shareholder proposal to require majority voting in non-contested director elections – requires that the votes cast in favor of such action exceed the votes cast against such action, assuming the presence of a quorum, abstentions and broker non-votes will not affectvotes.

20.Where can I find the results of the mattersAnnual Meeting?
We intend to be consideredannounce preliminary voting results at the Annual Meeting.
What percentage of outstanding shares do the directorsMeeting and executive officers own?
Together these persons had or shared the rightintend to vote or dispose of approximately 7.59% of our common stock as of the Record Date.
Who is paying the cost of preparing, assembling and mailing the notices of the Annual Meeting, Proxy Statement and form of proxy and the solicitation of the proxies?
The Company is paying all such costs. We may reimburse brokerage firms, custodians, nominees, fiduciaries and other persons representing beneficial owners for their reasonable expenses in forwarding solicitation material to such beneficial owners. Our directors, officers and employees may also solicit proxies in person or by other means of communication. Such directors, officers and employees will not be additionally compensated but may be reimbursed for reasonable out-of-pocket expenses in connection with such solicitation.
What is the deadline for submitting shareholder proposals for consideration at the Company’s next annual meeting of the shareholders or to nominate individuals to serve as directors?
For inclusion in HomeStreet’s proxy materials: Shareholders may present proper proposals for inclusion in HomeStreet’s Proxy Statement and for consideration at the next annual meeting of shareholders by submitting such proposals in writing to our Corporate Secretarypublish final results in a timely manner. In order to be included in the Proxy Statement for the 2017 annual meeting of shareholders, shareholder proposals must be received by HomeStreet’s Corporate Secretary no later than December 23, 2016, and must otherwise complyCurrent Report on Form 8-K, which we will file with the requirements of Rule 14a-8 of the Exchange Act and of HomeStreet’s bylaws.
To be brought before an annual meeting: In addition, our bylaws establish an advance notice procedure for shareholders who wish to present certain matters before an annual meeting of shareholders.


In general, nominations for the election of directors may be made (1) by or at the direction of the Board, or (2) by a shareholder who has delivered written notice to HomeStreet’s Corporate SecretarySEC within the Notice Period (as defined below) and who was a shareholder at the time of such notice and as of the Record Date. The notice must contain specified information about the nominees and about the shareholder proposing such nominations.
Our bylaws also provide that the onlyfour business that may be conducted at an annual meeting is business that is (1) specified in the notice of meeting given by or at the direction of the Board, (2) properly brought before the meeting by or at the direction of the Board or (3) properly brought before the meeting by a shareholder who has delivered written notice to our Corporate Secretary within the Notice Period (as defined below) and who was a shareholder at the time of such notice and as of the Record Date. The notice must contain specified information about the matters to be brought before such meeting and about the shareholder proposing such matters, including information related to the shareholder’s ownership interest in the Company and any material interests of the shareholder in the business desired to be brought before the meeting.
The “Notice Period” is defined as that period not less than 90 days nor more than 120 days prior to the one year anniversary of the previous year’s annual meeting date. As a result, the Notice Period for the 2017 annual meeting of shareholders will start on January 26, 2017 and end on February 25, 2017. However, if the annual meeting for 2017 is more than 30 days before or 60 days after May 26, 2017, in order to be timely notice must be delivered not less than 90 days nor more than 120 days prior to the actual date of the 2017 meeting; provided, that if the notice of such meeting is less than 100 days before the date of such meeting, notice of such proposal must be made not less than 10 days after the date of the notice of the meeting in order to be timely.Annual Meeting.
If a shareholder who has notified the Company of his or her intention to present a proposal at an annual meeting does not appear to present his or her proposal at such meeting, the Company need not present the proposal for vote at such meeting.
A copy of the full text of the bylaw provisions discussed above may be obtained by writing to our Corporate Secretary at our principal executive offices or by accessing our filings on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov. All notices of proposals by shareholders, whether or not included in our proxy materials, should be sent to our Corporate Secretary at our principal executive offices.
21.Who can help answer any other questions I may have?
Please contact our investor relations department by calling 206-264-4200, by writing to
If you have any questions or require any assistance with voting your shares, or if you need additional copies of the proxy materials, please contact:

HomeStreet, Inc., attn.:
Attn: Investor Relations
601 Union Street, Suite 2000
Seattle, WashingtonWA 98101 or by electronic mail at ir@homestreet.com



11





PROPOSAL 1

ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
Introduction
Our bylaws permit our
HomeStreet’s Board currently consists of Directorseight members, seven of whom are nominated and standing for election at the Annual Meeting. You are therefore being asked to establish by resolution the authorized number ofelect seven directors which shall be between seven and 13 directors. The Board is currently composed of 10 members, however, Bruce W. Williams,this year to serve a one of our Class II directors, has chosen to retire fromyear term on the Board until the 2024 annual meeting of shareholders, until their respective successors are duly elected and qualified or until their earlier death, resignation or removal. Mark R. Patterson expressed a preference not to be re-nominated. Mr. Patterson intends to serve on the Board through the date of the Annual Meeting and, effective as of the end of the Annual Meeting, therefore the Board of Directors has reduced the number of directors from 10 to nine effective upon the completion of Mr. William’shis term and eliminated one Class II director position. Our Articles of Incorporation provide that directors are elected for three-year terms, with one-third of the Board elected at each annual meeting of shareholders. Each director holds office until that director’s successor is duly elected and qualified or until his earlier death or resignation. Our directors are currently classified into the following three classes:
Class I directors are Scott M. Boggs, Douglas I. Smith and Timothy R. Chrisman and their terms will expire at the annual meeting of the shareholders to be held in 2018;
Class II directors are Mark K. Mason, Victor H. Indiek, Donald R. Voss and Bruce W. Williams, and their terms will expire at the Annual Meeting; and
Class III directors are David A. Ederer, Thomas E. King and George “Judd” Kirk and their terms will expire at the annual meeting of the shareholders to be held in 2017.
The three directors standing for election to our Board of Directors are all of our current Class II directors other than Bruce W. Williams. All nominees are incumbent directors of the Company.
Nominees for Director
Upon recommendation of the Human Resources and Corporate Governance Committee, the Board has nominated Mark K. Mason, Victor H. Indiek and Donald R. Voss for re-election to the Board as Class II directors with a term set to expire at the Company’s annual meeting of shareholders to be held in 2019. Biographical information about each of the nominees is contained in the following section.
A discussion of the qualifications, attributes and skills of each nominee that led our Board of Directors and the Human Resources and Corporate Governance Committee to the conclusion that he should continue to serve as a director has been added following each of the director and nominee biographies.
If you are a shareholder of record and you sign your proxy card but do not give instructions with respect to the voting of directors, your shares will be voted FOR the re-election of Messrs. Mason, Indiek and Voss. While we expect that all of the nominees will be able to qualify for and accept office, if for any reason a nominee is unable or declines to serve as a director at the timeopening of the polls at the Annual Meeting, the proxiesour authorized number of directors will be votedreduced to seven. The Board is grateful to Mr. Patterson for any nominee who shall be designated by the Board to fill such vacancy. If you wish to give specific instructions with respect to the votinghis dedication, service and contributions as a director of directors, you may do so by indicating your instructions on your proxy card. If you hold your shares in street name and you do not give voting instructions to your broker, your broker will leave your shares unvoted on this matter.our Company.
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR THE ELECTION OF EACH
OF MARK K. MASON, VICTOR H. INDIEK AND DONALD R. VOSS.



Information Regarding theThe Board of Directors and Nominees

The following table sets forth certain information with respect to theHomeStreet’s Board of Directors of HomeStreet, Inc.,Director nominees, including their ageseach nominee’s age as of April 22, 2016.March 31, 2023.


Directors
Director Age Director Since
Mark K. Mason, Chairman 63 2010
Scott M. Boggs 68 2012
Sandra A. Cavanaugh 68 2018
Jeffrey D. Green 59 2020
Joanne R. Harrell682022
James R. Mitchell, Jr. 73 2020
Nancy D. Pellegrino 66 2019

Under our Bylaws, any director nominee’s eligibility to serve as a director of HomeStreet, Inc.

DirectorAgeDirector SinceClassTerm Expiration
Mark K. Mason, Chairman562010Class II2016 Annual Meeting
David A. Ederer, Chairman Emeritus732005Class III2017 Annual Meeting
Timothy R. Chrisman692014Class I2018 Annual Meeting
Scott M. Boggs, Lead Director622012Class I2018 Annual Meeting
Victor H. Indiek782012Class II2016 Annual Meeting
Thomas E. King722012Class III2017 Annual Meeting
George “Judd” Kirk702012Class III2017 Annual Meeting
Douglas I. Smith522012Class I2018 Annual Meeting
Donald R. Voss652015Class II2016 Annual Meeting
Bruce W. Williams621994Class II2016 Annual Meeting


HomeStreet, Inc.’s Board of Directors currently consists of 10 members, however, the number of directors has been reducedCompany is subject to nine by an actionany required notification to, or approval, nonobjection or requirement of, the Board of Directors, to be effective upon Mr. Williams’s retirement from the Board asGovernors of the endFederal Reserve System, the Washington State Department of his term, which coincides withFinancial Institutions or any other regulatory entity having jurisdiction over the Annual Meeting. In 2015, the Company’s Board of Directors met 12 times. Our Board of Directors is divided into three classes and approximately one-third of our directors are elected each year to serve for a three year-term or until a successor is duly elected and qualified. Under our present bylaws, directors must comply with all applicable laws and regulations, including any required approvals from our regulators.Company.
The number of directors may be increased or decreased from time to time by our Board, of Directors, provided that a reduction in the number of directors may not shorten the term of an incumbent. Our Bylaws permit our Board to establish by resolution the authorized number of directors, which shall be between seven and thirteen directors. Newly created directorships resulting from any increase in the authorized number of directors or any vacancies in the Board may be filled solely by the affirmative vote of a majority of the remaining directors then in office, unless otherwise provided by law or by resolution of the Board. A majorityAll of our directorsdirector nominees, except for Mr. Mason, satisfy the definition of “independent director” under the corporate governance rules of Nasdaq.The Nasdaq Stock Market (“Nasdaq”).
NomineesKey Qualifications
The following table sets forth certain key qualifications and skills of our Board. The lack of a mark for Election as Directorsa particular item does not mean that the director does not possess that qualification, characteristic, skill or experience. We look to each director to be knowledgeable in these areas; however, the mark indicates that the item is a particularly prominent qualification, characteristic, skill or experience that the director brings to our Board. Our Board composition reflects our Board’s desire that directors have the broad expertise and perspective needed to govern our business and strengthen and support senior management.
12


QualificationMark
Mason
Scott
Boggs
Sandra
Cavanaugh
Jeffrey
Green
Joanne
Harrell
James
Mitchell Jr.
Nancy
Pellegrino
Financial Expertise Literacyüüüüüüü
Corporate Governanceüüüüüüü
Public Company Board Experienceüüüüüü
Strategic Planningüüüüüüü
Legalüü
Capital Managementüü
Technology Cybersecurityüüüüü
Auditüüüüü
Human Capital Managementüüüüüü
Marketingüüüüüü
Regulatory Risk Managementüüüüüüü
Business Developmentüüüüüü
Business Operationsüüüüüüü
Public Company Executive Experienceüüüüüü
Accountingüüüü
Industry Experienceüüüüüü

Upon recommendation of the Nominating and Governance Committee (the “N&G Committee”), the Board has nominated Mark K. Mason, Scott M. Boggs, Sandra A. Cavanaugh, Jeffrey D. Green, Joanne R. Harrell, James R. Mitchell, Jr. and Nancy D. Pellegrino for re-election to the Board with a one-year term set to expire at the Annual MeetingCompany’s next annual meeting of shareholders to be held in 2024. Biographical information about each of the nominees is contained in the following section. A discussion of the qualifications, attributes and skills of each nominee that led our Board and the N&G Committee to the conclusion that she or he should serve as a director appears following each of the director nominee biographies.
Mark K. Mason, Director, Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President of HomeStreet, Inc.
Mr. Mason has been the Company’s Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and a member of the Company’s Board and HomeStreet Bank’s Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer since January 20, 2010 and the2010. He became Chairman of the Board of the Company sincein March 26, 2015. From January 20, 2010 until March 25, 2015 Mr. Mason was theafter serving as Vice Chairman of the Company’sBoard since January 2010. Mr. Mason brings extensive business, managerial and leadership experience to our Board. From 1998 to 2002, Mr. Mason was president, chief executive officer and chief lending officer for Bank Plus Corporation and its wholly owned banking subsidiary, Fidelity Federal Bank, where Mr. Mason also served as the chief financial officer from 1994 to 1995 and as chairman of the board of directors from 1998 to 2002. From February 2008 to October 2008, Mr. Mason has also served as president of a startup energy company, TEFCO, LLC, and heLLC. He has served on the boards of directors of Hanmi Financial Corp., San Diego Community Bank and The Bjurman Barry Family of Mutual Funds. Mr. Mason is currently on the boards of directors of the Pacific Bankers Management Institute (the parent company of the Pacific Coast Banking SchoolSchool) and The Washington Bankers Association and is an advisory board member of Seattle University’s Albers School of Business and Economics. Mr. Mason is a certified public accountant (inactive) and holds a bachelor’s degree in Business Administrationbusiness administration with an emphasis in Accounting from California State Polytechnic University. Mr. Mason brings extensive business, managerial and leadership experience to our Board of Directors.
Mr. Mason was selected to serve as a director because of his position as our Chief Executive OfficerCEO and his significant experience as an executive officer, director of and consultant to other banks and mortgage companies, his credit and lending experience, finance and accounting education and experience and his relationships in the banking industry and the capital markets.


13


Victor H. Indiek, Director. Mr. Indiek joined the Board of Directors of HomeStreet, Inc. and the Bank upon the closing of our initial public offering in February 2012. He has been a project manager at Quantum Partners since 2007 where he manages FDIC receiverships, including the disposition of the assets of failed banks. He is currently a principal at Indiek Realty/Finance, which he formed in 1995. From 1999 to 2002 he served as a director and chairman of the audit committee of Bank Plus Corporation and Fidelity Federal Bank. Mr. Indiek was also involved in the formation of Freddie Mac, serving initially as its first chief financial officer from 1970 to 1973 and then as its president and chief executive officer from 1974 to 1977. He subsequently served as an executive officer at several financial institutions, including American Diversified Savings, American Savings/Financial Corporation of America and FarWest Savings, and as an audit manager for Arthur Andersen & Co. Mr. Indiek holds a bachelor’s degree in accounting from the University of Kansas, is a certified public accountant (inactive) and a California real estate broker. Mr. Indiek was selected to serve as a director because of his extensive experience in the banking and mortgage banking industries and because of his accounting education and experience.
Donald R. Voss, Director. Mr. Voss was appointed as a member of the Board on March 1, 2015 in connection with the closing of our acquisition of Simplicity Bancorp in Southern California. He previously served as a director of Simplicity Bancorp beginning in 2011 and the chairman of the board and member of the audit committee of Simplicity Bancorp from October 2013 until the acquisition of that company by HomeStreet in March 2015.  Prior to joining Simplicity’s board, Mr. Voss held a variety of positions in a 25 year career with First Interstate Bank, culminating as an Executive Vice President and Manager of the U.S. Banking Division in 1991.  Much of his banking experience was with domestic and international financial institutions. He was an elected Councilmember of the City of La Cañada Flintridge, California from 2006 until March 2015 and served as Mayor of that city from 2010 to 2011. In 2015, Mr. Voss received the 2015 El Gran Matador Award from California Contract Cities Association and the Reynolds Memorial Award from that organization in 2012. He also received the Les Tupper Service Award from the La Cañada Flintridge Coordinating Council in April 2016 for outstanding service to his community and was named 2015 La Cañadan of the Year by the Kiwanis Club of La Cañada.  Prior to his election to the City Council in 2006, Mr. Voss served for five years as City Treasurer of La Cañada Flintridge. Mr. Voss served as a board member of the San Gabriel Valley Chapter of the American Red Cross, including three years as chairman of that board, and also served on the audit committee of that organization. He has also served on the boards of the Los Angeles Division of the League of California Cities, the Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles County, the Southern California Association of Governments, the California Contract Cities Association and the San Gabriel Valley Council of Governments, as well as the advisory board of the Santa Monica Mountains Conservancy, an agency of the state of California. Mr. Voss holds a bachelor’s degree in business administration from the University of Washington and a graduate degree in banking from Stonier Graduate School of Banking. He brings general business, financial, credit and risk management, treasury management, and governance skills, which are of importance to his service on our Board, audit committee and governance/nominating committee.
Directors Continuing in Office
Scott M. Boggs, Lead Independent Director. Director
Mr. Boggs joined theHomeStreet Bank in 2006 as a member of theits board of directors and became a director of HomeStreet, Inc. following the closing of our initial public offeringCompany in February 2012. Mr. Boggs was electedserved as the lead independent directorLead Independent Director of the Board infrom March 2015.2015 through June 2018. Prior to joining the Bank,HomeStreet Bank’s board of directors, Mr. Boggs was employed by Microsoft Corporation from 1993 to 2003 where he served in a variety of positions, including vice president, corporate controller from 1998 to 2003. Mr. Boggs was also an adjunct professor for the Seattle University Albers School of Business and Economics, teaching accounting and information systems from 2004 until 2009. Mr. Boggs previously served as a trustee and chair of the audit committee and budget and investments committee of the Financial Executives Research Foundation from 2002 to 2008, as director, chair of the pension committee and a member of the audit committee and designated financial expert of the Cascade Natural Gas Corporation from 2004 to 2007, and director, vice chair of audit committee and designated financial expert of the Safeco family of mutual funds from 2002 to 2004. He is a former member of the National Association of Corporate Directors, and former member ofSeattle University Internal Audit Advisory Board, the King County Strategic Technology Advisory Council, the Seattle University Accounting Advisory Board and the Financial Executives International. Mr. Boggs started his career as a certified public accountant (currently inactive) with Deloitte, Haskins & Sells from 1977 to 1985, and he received his bachelor’s degree in Accounting from the University of Washington.
Mr. Boggs was selected to serve as a director because of his


significant accounting and financial experience, his accounting credentials and degree as well asand his experience as a designated financial expert on audit committees.
Timothy R. Chrisman, Director.  Mr. ChrismanSandra A. Cavanaugh, Director
Ms. Cavanaugh joined HomeStreet asthe Board in May 2018. Ms. Cavanaugh has more than 30 years of experience in the financial services, banking and mutual fund industries. As president and CEO of U.S. Private Client Services of Russell Investments from January 2010 until her retirement in June 2016, Ms. Cavanaugh oversaw a director$45 billion mutual fund business in July 2014. Mr. Chrisman is the founding partner of Chrisman & Company, a Los Angeles-based retained executive search firm focusing on financial and related industries.U.S. Prior to forming his own company, Mr. Chrismanjoining Russell Investments, Ms. Cavanaugh was aan executive vice president at SunTrust Bank in 2009, and held senior executive positions at Washington Mutual/JP Morgan Chase from 2007 to 2009, including as president of WM Funds Distributor and Shareholder Services from 1997 to 2007. Ms. Cavanaugh also held various senior positions with AIM Mutual Funds, First Interstate Bank and American Savings Bank. Since her retirement from Russell Investments in 2016, Ms. Cavanaugh has provided consulting services to help financial services companies build and execute brand, product and distribution strategies. In addition to her executive career, Ms. Cavanaugh holds several board and advisory roles. She received her bachelor’s degree in History with a $2 billion financial institution for 10 years, where he focused on retail delivery, marketing, human resources and general management. Mr. Chrisman was the Chairman of BANC of California, Inc., the holding company for Banc of California from May 2011 through 2014 and a director of Waterfield Bank from 2006 through 2010. He previously served as Director of Commercial Capital Bank and Commercial Capital Bancorp, and was Chairman of the Board from 2004 to 2005. He also was the former Chairman of the Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco for 10 years and the former Chairman of the Council of Federal Home Loan Banks. He currently serves as a Senior Advisor to the investment banking firm, FIG Partners LLC. Mr. Chrisman received both a bachelor’s of scienceminor in marketing and a masters in business administration from California State University, Fresno. Mr. ChrismanFresno and previously held active NASD/FINRA Securities Licenses Series 7, 24, and 53.
Ms. Cavanaugh was selected to serve as a director because of hisher executive management, human capital management, business and financial experience and her background as an expert in the banking and financial services industry.
David A. Ederer,Jeffrey D. Green, Director and Chairman Emeritus of the Board.
Mr. Ederer joined the Bank in 2004Green was appointed as a member of its boardthe Board in June 2020 to fill a vacancy on the Board. Mr. Green retired as the Financial Institutions National Practice leader and audit and client service Partner of directorsMoss Adams LLP, a national accounting, tax, and advisory firm in December 2018, having served with the firm since 1990. From 2015 to 2018, Mr. Green was Moss Adams’ Financial Institutions National Practice Leader, and in 2005that role, was responsible for that firm’s national financial institutions practice, covering accounting, auditing, internal control, and strategic issues facing publicly traded bank reporting companies, community banks, thrifts, and mortgage banking companies. From 2007 to 2015 Mr. Green was the Managing Partner of Moss Adams’ Everett, Washington practice office. Over his 31 year career in public accounting, Mr. Green gained significant experience working with the boards and audit committees of publicly traded banking and lending institutions while managing major client relationships across multiple markets. In those roles, Mr. Green developed expertise in complex accounting, auditing, internal control, financial reporting, and regulatory compliance matters. He holds a Bachelor of Science in business administration with a focus in accounting from Washington State University and is a certified public accountant and member of the Washington State Society of Certified Public Accountants and the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants.
14


Mr. Green was selected to serve because of his background as an audit partner for companies in the financial institutions industry, expertise in commercial banking, professional qualifications, financial literacy and his qualification as an audit committee “financial expert”.
Joanne R. Harrell, Director
Ms. Harrell joined the board in January 2022. From 2001 until her retirement in October 2021 as Senior Director, USA AI, Sustainability & Market Development Strategy at Microsoft Corporation, Ms. Harrell held various executive positions with Microsoft where she led teams in the sales, marketing and services disciplines focused on enterprise, public sector and original equipment manufacturing customers and partners. Ms. Harrell has served as a Regent for the University of Washington since 2009. Prior to joining Microsoft in 2001, Ms. Harrell was President and Chief Executive Officer of the United Way of King County, Washington and held various positions with US West Communications, Inc. and AT&T, Inc. Ms. Harrell holds a B.A. in communications-advertising and an M.B.A in marketing from the University of Washington.
Ms. Harrell was selected to serve as director because of her experience in the areas of marketing, sales, strategy, communications, community service and diversity, social responsibility, sustainability, public affairs and corporate citizenship, in addition to her extensive background in executive management.
James R. Mitchell, Jr., Director
Mr. Mitchell joined the Board in January 2020. Mr. Mitchell has worked in commercial banking for more than 40 years, including founding Puget Sound Bank in 2004, where he served as president and chief executive officer from inception until the merger of that bank with Heritage Bank in January 2018. He was also became a member of the Board of Directors of HomeStreet, Inc. Mr. Ederer was electedPuget Sound Bank from 2004 through January 2018, serving as chairman of thatthe board in 2009from 2004 through 2008. After the merger of Puget Sound Bank and took on the title of Chairman Emeritus in March 2015 whenHeritage Bank, Mr. Mason assumed the role of Chairman. Since 1974 Mr. Ederer hasMitchell served as the chairmanmarket president for King County for Heritage Bank for the next year, until January 2019, and then as a consultant to Heritage Bank until January 2020. Prior to founding Puget Sound Bank, Mr. Mitchell served as a Senior Vice President at Sterling Bank, where he opened and grew the Seattle corporate banking office, from 2002 to 2004, and a Senior Vice President and team leader for the Seattle corporate banking team of Ederer Investment Company, a private investment company,U.S. Bank from 1990 through 2002. Mr. Mitchell served on the Board of Directors of the Washington Bankers Association from 2011 to 2018, the Board of Directors of the Western Bankers Association from 2015 to 2018, and he currently serves on the board of directors of the Prostate Cancer Foundation (formerly CaPCURE), PONCHO, CRISTA Ministries and the University of Washington Medical Institute for Prostate Cancer Research.Bellevue LifeSpring, a nonprofit organization, from 2009 to 2017. Mr. Ederer has previously served as a director of a number of public and private companies, organizations and institutions, including Cascade Natural Gas, University Savings Bank, Farmers New World Life Insurance Company, Children’s Hospital and Seattle Pacific University. Mr. Ederer is a certified public accountant (inactive) and managed consulting, accounting and auditing services for Price Waterhouse from 1965 to 1974. Mr. EdererMitchell received ahis bachelor’s degree infrom Seattle University, a Masters of Business Administration from the University of Washington. Washington and his juris doctorate from Southwestern University School of Law.
Mr. EdererMitchell was selected to serve as a director based on his knowledge of the banking industry, experience as a chief executive officer and director of a bank, and expertise in commercial banking.
Nancy D. Pellegrino, Director
Ms. Pellegrino joined the Board in October 2019. Ms. Pellegrino has more than 30 years of experience in the financial services, private banking, and wealth management industries. She served as a Managing Director and Regional CEO for Citi Private Bank from July 2010 through October 2013 and BNY Mellon Wealth Management from August 2000 through July 2010 where she served as Pacific Northwest President and Regional Director. She was also at Banc One Corp from June 1990 through June 2000, rising to the position of Senior Vice President and Regional Sales Director for the Midwest, prior to which she was a Vice President at Texas Commerce Bank Trust Company, which she joined in 1982. She also served on the Board of Directors of Puget Sound Bank from September 2014 until January 2018. Since her retirement from Citi Private Bank in 2013, Ms. Pellegrino is providing consulting services to individuals, teams and organizations drawing on her corporate and board leadership experience. She also serves on the boards of several nonprofit organizations, including the Fred Hutch Cancer Research Center Board of Ambassadors. She also has held numerous Board leadership positions for a number of non-profit organizations including Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center and Woodland Park Zoo, where she is currently Director Emeritus Ms. Pellegrino received her bachelor’s degree from Vanderbilt University in Fine Arts and is a graduate of the Northwestern University Graduate Trust School.
15


Ms. Pellegrino was selected to serve as a director because of his experience as a director on public company boards, his experience on board committees, his financial expertiseher executive leadership, management, risk management and his professional degrees and training in business and management.
Thomas E. King, Director. Mr. King joined the board of directors of the Bank in 2010 and became a director of HomeStreet, Inc. following the closing of our initial public offering in February 2012. Prior to joining the Bank’s board, Mr. King served as president and chief executive officer, chief credit officer and director of San Diego Community Bank from 2001 to 2006. Since retiring from San Diego Community Bank following its sale to First Banks, Inc. in 2006, Mr. King has provided consulting services to banks and other financial services companies. Prior to joining San Diego Community Bank, he served as executive vice president and chief operating officer of Fullerton Community Bank from 1997 to 1998, president and chief executive officer and director of the Bank of Southern California from 1994 to 1996, and president, chief executive officer and director of Capitol Bank Sacramento from 1992 to 1994. From 1969 to 1992, Mr. King held various senior positions in commercial lending, real estate lending, credit administration, corporate and merchant banking and retail banking at Security Pacific National Bank. He received a bachelor’s degree in Business Administration from California State University, Northridge. Mr. King was chosen to serve as a director because of his experience as an executive officer, director and consultant to banks and financial services companies, his commercial banking relationships, his financial experience, commercial lending and credit administration experience and distressed institution turnaround experience.
George Judd” Kirk, Director. Mr. Kirk has served as a member of the board of directors of the Bank since 2008 and became a director of HomeStreet, Inc. following the closing of our initial public offering in February 2012. From February 2012 until March 2015, Mr. Kirk served as Lead Independent Director of the Bank’s board of directors. Mr. Kirk served as president of Port Blakely Communities, Inc. from 1997 to 2007 and as its Chief Executive Officer from 2007 to 2008. Prior to joining Port Blakely Communities, he served as president of Skinner Development Company and until 1986, chaired the Real Estate Department of Davis Wright Tremaine LLP in Seattle. Mr. Kirk is a past member of the Washington State Bar Association (WSBA). He has previously served as a member of the Urban Land Institute (CDC Council), American College of Real Estate Lawyers, and the Pacific


Real Estate Institute. He has also been a member of the boards of directors of several community organizations, including University of Washington Physicians and the Cascade Land Conservancy. Mr. Kirk has previously served as the chairman of the WSBA Real Property, Probate and Trust Section, President of the Issaquah Chamber of Commerce and President of the University of Washington Alumni Association. Mr. Kirk received a bachelor’s degree in Finance from the University of Washington, School of Business, and a law degree cum laude from Harvard Law School. Mr. Kirk was selected to serve as a director because of his business and management experience, his real estate development experience, his knowledge of real estate and real estate finance and his legal experience, as well as his civic and community service involvement.
Douglas I. Smith, Director. Mr. Smith joined our Board of Directors upon the closing of our initial public offering in February 2012. Mr. Smith is a director of and has worked for Miller and Smith Inc., a privately held residential land development and home building company in metropolitan Washington, D.C., since 1992, and has served as its president since 1998 and he is the managing member of Miller and Smith LLC and Silent Tree LLC. He has also been a board member of Home Aid Northern Virginia since 2001. Mr. Smith holds an MBA from Harvard Business School and a bachelor’s degree in economics from DePauw University. Mr. Smith has been elected to serve as a director because of his experience in the residential construction lending area as well as his experience in the home building and land development industries.

financial services industry.

PROPOSAL 2
RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
General
The Audit Committee has selected Deloitte & Touche LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm to audit the consolidated financial statements of HomeStreet and its subsidiaries for the fiscal year ending December31, 2016. We have used Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm since January 1, 2013, when they replaced KPMG LLP, who audited the company’s financial statements from 2003 through 2012.
Shareholder ratification of the selection of Deloitte & Touche LLP is not required by our bylaws or other applicable legal requirements. However, the Board is submitting the selection of Deloitte & Touche LLP to our shareholders for ratification as a matter of good corporate practice. In the event that this selection of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm is not ratified by our shareholders at the Annual Meeting, the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm will be reconsidered by the Audit Committee. Even if the selection is ratified, the Audit Committee in its discretion may direct the appointment of a different accounting firm at any time during the year if the Audit Committee determines that such a change would be in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders.
Representatives of Deloitte & Touche LLP are expected to be present at the Annual Meeting and will be given the opportunity to make a statement at the Annual Meeting if they desire to do so and respond to questions about the financial statements and related matters for the 2013, 2014 and 2015 fiscal years.
Principal Accounting Fees and Services
The following table presents fees billed for professional audit services and other services rendered to the Company by Deloitte & Touche LLP for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014. Amounts in this table are presented in thousands.

 2015 2014
    
Audit Fees (1)
$1,353
 $741
Audit-Related Fees (2)
297
 127
Tax Fees (3)
170
 
All Other Fees (4)

 144
Total$1,820
 $1,012
(1)Audit Fees consist of fees billed for professional services rendered for the audit of our consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K and for the review of our quarterly financial statements, as well as services that generally only our independent registered public accounting firm can reasonably provide, including statutory audits and services rendered in connection with SEC filings.
(2)Audit-Related Fees consist of fees billed for professional services rendered for the audit of our consolidated financial statements in connection with acquisition transactions completed by the Company during the reported fiscal year.
(3)Tax Fees consists of fees billed for professional services rendered for tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning in 2015.
(4)All Other Fees consist of fees billed for professional services rendered for tax compliance, including tax filings, and tax consulting related to our acquisition activities during 2014.

Pre-Approval of Audit and Non-Audit Services
It is the responsibility of HomeStreet’s Audit Committee to pre-approve all audit and non-audit services provided by our independent auditor. The Audit Committee has adopted a policy authorizing certain permissible audit and non-audit services to be performed by our independent auditor with subsequent reporting and oversight required by


the Audit Committee. Permissible services, not pre-approved pursuant to this policy, require specific review and approval prior to the engagement by the Audit Committee, or a designated member. All services rendered by and fees paid to our independent auditor are reported to and monitored quarterly by the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee considers whether the provision of related audit services is compatible with maintaining the independent registered public accounting firm’s independence. To assist the Audit Committee in its oversight responsibilities, the pre-approval policy identifies the three basic principles of independence with respect to services provided by the independent registered public accounting firm, as well as the non-audit services the independent registered public accounting firm is prohibited from providing. All services provided by Deloitte & Touche LLP in each of the last two fiscal years were pre-approved by the Audit Committee.

THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS VOTING “FOR” THE ELECTION OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS SHAREHOLDERS VOTE FOR THE RATIFICATIONEACH OF THE APPOINTMENT OF DELOITTE & TOUCHELLP AS HOMESTREET’S INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING DECEMBER 31, 2016.

SEVEN DIRECTOR NOMINEES.


PROPOSAL 3
16


SHAREHOLDER PROPOSAL FOR MAJORITY VOTING INENGAGEMENT
NON-CONTESTED ELECTIONS OF DIRECTORS

2022 Shareholder Outreach
Introduction
In accordance with SEC rules, we have set forth below a shareholder proposal, along with the supporting statement of the shareholder proponent, for which we andAt our Board accept no responsibility. The shareholder proposal is required to be voted upon at our Annual Meeting only if properly presented at our Annual Meeting. As explained below, our Board unanimously recommends that you vote “FOR” the shareholder proposal.

California State Retirement Teachers’ System, located at 100 Waterfront Place, MS-04, West Sacramento, California 95605-2807, the beneficial owner of no less than $2,000 in market value of the Company’s common stock held continuously for over one year prior to the date the proposal was submitted, has notified the Company of its intent to present the following proposal and supporting statement at the Annual Meeting.
Proposal
BE IT RESOLVED:
That the shareholders of HomeStreet, Inc. hereby request that the Board of Directors initiate the appropriate process to amend the Company’s articles of incorporation and/or bylaws to provide that director nominees shall be elected by the affirmative vote of the majority of votes cast at an2022 annual meeting of shareholders with a plurality vote standard retained for contested director elections, that is, when the numberMark K. Mason received support from 97.7% of director nominees exceeds the number of board seats.
Statement of Shareholder Regarding Proposal:
In order to provide shareholders a meaningful role in director elections, the Company’s current director election standard should be changedvotes cast; Scott M. Boggs received support from a plurality vote standard to a majority vote standard. The majority vote standard is the most appropriate voting standard for director elections where only board nominated candidates are on the ballot, and it will establish a challenging vote standard for board nominees to improve the performance of individual directors and entire boards. Under the Company’s current voting system, a nominee for the board can be elected with as little as a single affirmative vote, because “withheld” votes have no legal effect. A majority vote standard would require that a nominee receive a majority97.5% of the votes cast; each of Sandra A. Cavanaugh, Jeffrey D. Green, James R. Mitchell, Jr. and Nancy D. Pellegrino received support from 96.5% of votes cast and Joanne R. Harrell received support from 99.9% of the votes cast.

For the “say-on-pay” vote approving our executive compensation, we received approval from 98.3% of votes cast (for and against). Based on this high approval rating and the feedback we received from our investors generally in order2022, we do not believe our shareholders have significant concerns about our executive compensation program.

We routinely provide opportunities for our shareholders to connect with our leadership team. In 2022, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer attended a number of investor and industry conferences where we were able to engage with active managers of hedge funds and mutual funds who are investors or potential investors in HomeStreet. We also routinely attend ad hoc meetings with individual current or prospective investors.


Shareholder Interest in Environmental, Social and Governance Matters

Several of our larger investors have provided statements to the market and to their portfolio companies generally regarding matters relating to environmental, social and governance (“ESG”) matters in recent years. These have often focused on issues of diversity, equity and inclusion for boards of directors and senior management, concerns about addressing climate change and environmental issues and social justice and equality. While we have not engaged individually with our investors on these matters in any significant depth, we are aware of the issues many have raised.

Our N&G Committee, consistent with our Principles of Corporate Governance, continues to make diversity a priority in identifying and considering potential director candidates. In addition, in 2020 the Washington state legislature adopted a new law that applies to companies like ours that are incorporated in that state providing that at least 25% of our Board must be comprised of individuals who identify as women for our Board to be re-electedconsidered “gender diverse”, and continueif we do not have a gender diverse board for at least 270 days of any year, we will be required to serveprovide discussion and analysis to our shareholders regarding the Board’s approach to developing and maintaining diversity on the Board. Our board is gender diverse, with 38% of our Board comprised of individuals who identify as a representativewomen.

We have also listened to concerns raised generally by investors and proxy advisory firms regarding environmental issues such as climate change and sustainability. See the Corporate Governance - Environmental, Social and Governance Matters below for the shareholders.additional information.
In response to strong shareholder support a substantial number of the nation’s leading companies have adopted a majority vote standard in company bylaws or articles of incorporation. In fact, more than 94% of the companies in the S&P 500 have adopted majority voting for uncontested elections. Ongoing Shareholder Engagement
We believe the Company needs to join the growing list of companies that have already adopted this, standard.
Ca1STRS is a long-term shareholder of the Company and we believe that accountability is of upmost importance. We believe the plurality vote standard currently in place at the Company completely disenfranchises shareholders and makes the shareholder’s role in director elections meaningless. Majority voting in director elections will empower shareholders with the ability to remove poorly performing directors and increase the directors’ accountability to the owners of the Company, its shareholders. In addition, those directors who receive the majority support from shareholders will know they have the backing of the very shareholders they represent. We therefore ask you to join us in requesting that the Board of directors promptly adopt the majority vote standard for director elections.
Please vote FOR this proposal.
Board Recommendation
After considering the merits of the shareholder’s position as stated below, the Board determined that the advantages of majority voting outweigh the disadvantages, and believe that the best interestsencourage all of our shareholders are servedto reach out to us with questions or comments they may have regarding our Company. We maintain an investor relations website at http://ir.homestreet.com and shareholders can reach our investor relations department by adopting this proposal. This recommendation should not be construed as a suggestion that the shareholder’s

email at ir@homestreet.com; by phone at (206) 515-2291; and by mail at HomeStreet Inc., Attn: Investor Relations, 601 Union Street, Suite 2000, Seattle, WA 98101. Shareholders can also find our Shareholder Engagement Procedures and Practices on our investor relations website, which provides guidelines for how shareholders can communicate with our Board.

17
explanation reflects the Board’s position entirely, or that the Board did not consider these and other reasons in reaching its decision to recommend adoption. Likewise, the Board considered the fact that, while one or more shareholders might feel strongly enough about a corporate governance matter to offer a formal proposal, that shareholder’s interests might differ in material respects from those of our shareholders as a whole, or from those of a majority of our shareholders. Nevertheless, considering the circumstances attendant to this request, the explanation proffered by the shareholder in support of its position, the interests of our shareholders at large, and the best interests of the Company, the Board has unanimously recommended the adoption of the foregoing resolution.




THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS SHAREHOLDERS VOTE FOR THE SHAREHOLDER PROPOSAL FOR MAJORITY VOTING
IN NON-CONTESTED ELECTIONS OF DIRECTORS.


CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
As a bank holding company, we believe it is important to foster an operating environment that articulates a strong focus on compliance and ethical standards, and our Board sets this tone from the top. Our Board is actively engaged in designing, monitoring and enforcing compliance with high governance standards. We discuss our most important corporate governance policies and practices below. Each of our corporate governance policies is reviewed by the committee responsible for that policy and the full Board at least annually, and more frequently if warranted.
Code of Ethics
The Board has established a code of ethics as defined under the Securities Exchange Act thatof 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), which applies to all HomeStreet directors, officers and employees of HomeStreet and its subsidiaries, including our principal executive officer, principal financial officer and principal accounting officer or controller. A copy of our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics (“Code of Ethics”) is availablecan be found on our website at investor relations website: http://ir.homestreet.com.ir.homestreet.com. We will post on our website any amendments to, or waivers (with respect to our principal executive officer, principal financial officer and principal accounting officer or controller) from, this Code of Ethics within four business days of any such amendment or waiver.waiver and, to the extent required by the listing standards of Nasdaq, by filing a Current Report on Form 8-K with the SEC disclosing such information. Among other things, the Code of Ethics addresses the following principles:
maintaining accurate and complete records;
avoiding conflicts of interest;
complying with laws and regulations;
prohibiting insider trading;
avoiding conflicts of interest;
avoiding questionable gifts or favors;
maintaining accurate and complete records;
treating others in an ethical manner;
maintaining integrity of consultants, agents and representatives; and
protecting proprietary information and proper use of assets.
Whistleblower Policy
In addition to our Code of Ethics, we maintain a whistleblower policy which is intended to provide guidance to employees, shareholders and others who may be aware of or concerned about potential violations of our Code of Ethics or other forms of misconduct and wish to report such concerns to our Ethics Compliance with Section 16(a)Officer, either directly or anonymously through our whistleblower hotline or website.
We have crafted our whistleblower policy to make clear our commitment to providing a confidential process by which individuals can raise questions and concerns about potential misconduct, including potential violations of law, regulation or Company policy, and report potential misconduct while strictly prohibiting any attempt by any director, officer or employee of the ExchangeCompany to identify whistleblowers or retaliate or attempt to retaliate against any whistleblower, anonymous or otherwise. Nothing in the policy is intended to prohibit or impede the reporting of alleged accounting irregularities or securities violations, or anything else covered by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, the Dodd-Frank Act or any other applicable law directly to the SEC whether or not an initial report is made internally to the Company.
Section 16(a) ofWe provide information on how to access our third-party whistleblower hotline, EthicsPoint, by telephone or through the Exchange Act requiresInternet on both our executive officersinternal human resources website and directors, and persons who own more than ten percent of a registered class of our equity securities (our “Reporting Persons”), to fileexternal investor relations website at http://ir.homestreet.com.
18


At each regular meeting the Audit Committee discusses whistleblower reports, if any, with the Securities and Exchange Commission reports of ownership and reports of changes in ownership of common stock and our other equity securities. Reporting Persons are required by SEC regulations to furnish us with copies ofEthics Compliance Officer, including all Section 16(a) forms they file. Based solely on our review of suchnew reports received or written representations from certain Reporting Persons,since the Company believes that during fiscal 2015 all Reporting Persons complied with all applicable requirements except that one executive officer had a late Form 4 filinglast meeting, any ongoing whistleblower investigations, and one director had a late Form 3 filing.the resolution of any closed investigation.
Principles of Corporate Governance
The Company has adopted Principles of Corporate Governance, which are availablecan be found on the Company’s website at our investor relations website: http://ir.homestreet.com.ir.homestreet.com. Shareholders may request a free copy of the Principles of Corporate Governance at the address andor phone numbersnumber set forth above.
Director Independence
The Board has determined that, with the exception of Mark K. Mason, our Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, all of its members are currently “independent directors” as that term is defined in the listing standards of Nasdaq and, where applicable, the regulations adopted under Sections 10A and 14C10C of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.Act. In the course of determining the independence of each nonemployee director, the Board considered the annual amount of HomeStreet’s sales to, or purchases from, any company where a nonemployee director serves as an executive officer as well as all other relevant facts and circumstances, including the director’s commercial, accounting, legal, banking, consulting, charitable and familial relationships. Without limiting
Board Diversity
Our Principles of Corporate Governance include a commitment to diversity as a guideline for our director nomination process. In particular, the generalityguideline provides that the Board and N&G Committee “will actively seek to include highly qualified women and individuals from minority groups in the pool of candidates from which nominees for director positions are chosen, and in choosing between equally qualified candidates will give extra weight to diversity of the foregoing,candidates.” The N&G Committee continues to consider diversity an important goal in Board refreshment, consistent with the diversity expectations we continue to hear from our shareholders in our engagement process.
In connection with our 2022 annual meeting of shareholders, the N&G Committee and the Board considered various aspectsthe diversity of the relationship betweenBoard as a whole and the Companydiverse backgrounds and an entity controlled by Director Timothy R. Chrisman, discussedperspectives of each director nominee as one of several factors in greater detail under “Certain Relationshipsits nomination process. Our Board is comprised of 38% of individuals who identify as women. The current composition of our Board reflects our ongoing commitment to diversity in the director nomination process.

Board Diversity Matrix (As of March 31, 2023):
Total Number of Directors: 8
  Female Male Non-Binary Did Not
Disclose
Gender
Part I: GENDER IDENTITY        
Directors 3 5  
Part II: DEMOGRAPHIC BACKGROUND        
African American or Black 1   
Alaskan Native or Native American    
Asian    
Hispanic or Latinx    
Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander    
White 2 5  
Two or More Races or Ethnicities    
LGBTQ+    
Did Not Disclose Demographic Background    
19


Board Assessment, Refreshment and Related Transactions,” below, includingOrientation Process
Each year, our Board undertakes a formal self-evaluation process during which all members are asked to identify their areas of strength and expertise. The N&G Committee then aggregates this information into a report on the naturestrength of the services providedBoard which includes, among other things, the skills matrix that we include in this proxy statement. This assessment process, and especially the payments madeskills matrix, allows the N&G Committee to identify where there may be gaps in connection therewith, in concluding that Mr. Chrisman is an independent director within the meaningoverall skill set of the applicable corporate governance standards.



Board Leadership Structureas a whole so that we can, if necessary, undertake a search for qualified candidates who not only have senior-management level experience in public companies, financial institutions and banking and fit the stated goals for diversity in our Principles of Corporate Governance, but can also help to broaden or deepen the skillset that we have on our Board.
Our Board believes it is in the best interests of Directorsour shareholders to refresh our Board membership on a regular basis by considering new director candidates who can bring a fresh or different perspective to the Board. We have heard from our shareholders that they also value regular Board refreshment measures.
Since January 2018, we have added six new directors to the Board; Mr. Patterson, Ms. Cavanaugh, Ms. Pellegrino, Mr. Mitchell, Mr. Green and Ms. Harrell, and seven directors have left the Board.
While board refreshment is important to bring new perspectives, our Board has also implemented a formal onboarding and orientation process for new directors in order to maintain continuity and bring new directors up to speed with the Company’s operations, corporate governance practices and overall strategy. The orientation is designed to help new directors contribute fully to their governance work on the Board as early in their tenure as possible. As a result of the process, directors are expected to understand: (1) their roles and responsibilities and time commitment to their governance work; (2) the current goals, opportunities and challenges facing the Company; (3) major lines of business and the key leaders; (4) key initiatives and overall business strategy; (5) the Company’s stakeholders; (6) how the directors’ own background, knowledge and skillsets can contribute to the Board’s work and the Company’s goals; (7) the background, knowledge and skillsets of each of the other directors and key leaders of the Company; (8) how Board decisions are made; and (9) the Company’s formal governing policies and practices. The onboarding and orientation process involves several meetings with the CEO, the lead independent director, standing committee chairpersons, a Board mentor, key executives including the general counsel and other staff members. These meetings cover a broad array of topics including the strategic plan and planning process; the Company’s vision values goals and culture; the Company’s recent successes and challenges; charters of the Company, its principal subsidiaries and various committees; Board and executive compensation details and philosophies; recent CEO performance reviews; executive leadership and succession planning; organization charts; biographies; Board development and training. Copies of key Board documents are scheduled and provided in hard copy or by electronic access to each new member.
Board Leadership Structure
Our Board believes that it is in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders for the Board to retain discretion to make a determination regardingdetermine whether or not to separate the roles of Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive OfficerCEO based upon varying circumstances.circumstances, and the majority of our shareholders have supported this approach, voting against a proposal to require the separation of those roles at our 2019 annual shareholder meeting. The Board of Directors is currently chaired by Mr. Mason, our Chief Executive Officer,CEO, who is subject to re-appointment as Chairman of the Board each year by the BoardBoard. Our Principles of Directors.
Since our Initial Public Offering in 2012,Corporate Governance provide that if the Chairman of the Board is an executive of the Company, the independent directors shall elect a Lead Independent Director.
The Company’s Bylaws and Principles of Corporate Governance provide a clear description of the role of the Lead Independent Director. The Lead Independent Director presides over all executive sessions of independent or non-management directors, and in the absence of the Chairman of the Board presides over shareholder meetings and Board meetings; serves as the liaison between the Chairman and the independent directors; meets with the Chairman prior to all Board Meetings to review and discuss the agenda; and has maintainedthe right to approve meeting agendas, meeting schedules and other information sent to the Board. The Lead Independent Director also serves as the primary point of contact (through the Corporate Secretary) for shareholders wishing to engage with the Board.

20


The Board maintains a Lead Independent Director to facilitate discussion, coordinate and reflect the views of the independent board members.directors and, most importantly, to ensure that the Company’s governance practices are aligned in the best interests of all shareholders. Mr. BoggsPatterson was appointed Lead Independent Director by the independent directors of the Board in 2022 and currently serves in that role. The Board reviews the appointment of our Lead Independent Director position each year.
The Board believes that this leadership structure provides balance and currently is in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders. The role given to the Lead Independent Director helps to ensure a strong, independent and is subjectactive Board, while Mr. Mason serving as the Chairman of the Board enables the Company and the Board to reappointment each year bycontinue to benefit from his skills and expertise, including his extensive knowledge of the Board.Company and its industry and his experience successfully navigating the Company through both strong and challenging periods.
The following table illustrates how responsibilities are delegated between the CEO and the Lead Independent Director:

ResponsibilityChairman/Chief Executive OfficerLead Independent Director
Board Meeting
•   Authority to call full meetings of the Board
•   Presides over meetings of the full Board
•   Attends full meetings of the Board
•   Presides over meetings of independent directors and non-management directors
•   Briefs Chairman on issues arising from executive sessions of independent directors
•   Presides over meetings of the Board in the absence of the Chairman

Prepares minutes from executive sessions of independent directors for any Board actions

Agenda•   Primary responsibility for shaping Board agendas, consulting with the Lead Independent Director
•   Collaborates with Chairman to set Board agenda and provide Board with information
•   Approves agenda and meeting schedules to be sent to the Board
Board Communications•   Communicates with all directors on key issues and concerns outside Board meetings•   Facilitates discussion among independent directors on key issues and concerns outside Board meetings, including contributing to the oversight of the Chairman and management succession planning
Shareholder Communications•   Primary spokesperson for the Company in communications to shareholders•   Serves as liaison for shareholders who wish to communicate with the Board (such communications to be sent through the Corporate Secretary)
Board Role in Risk Oversight
The Board, together with its committees and senior management, has oversight of our risk management framework and is responsible for overseeing the majorhelping to ensure that our risks facingare managed in a sound manner. The Board’s principal responsibility in this area is to oversee an enterprise-wide approach to risk management and ensure that sufficient resources, with appropriate technical and managerial skills, are provided throughout the Company while managementto identify, assess and facilitate processes and practices to address material risks. We believe that the current leadership structure enhances the Board’s ability to fulfill this oversight responsibility, as the Chairman, in his role as CEO, is responsible for assessing and mitigatingable to focus the Company’sBoard’s attention on the key risks on a day-to-day basis. we face.
21


In addition, the Board has delegated oversight of certain categories of risk to the Audit Committee, the Enterprise Risk Management (“ERM”) Committee, the Compensation Committee and the Human Resources and Corporate Governance, or HRCGN&G Committee. The Audit Committee reviews and discusses with management significant financial and nonfinancialnon-financial risk exposures and the steps management has taken to monitor, control and report such exposures. The Enterprise Risk ManagementERM Committee oversees and assesses the adequacy of the Company’s risk management framework, monitors compliance with the Board-approved risk appetite measures and other key risk measures and oversees management of key enterprise-wide risks not overseen by other committees of the Board, including legal, compliance and monitors the Company’s risk profileoperational risks, information technology, information security and exposure to various types ofcybersecurity risks. The HRCGCompensation Committee oversees management of risks relating to the Company’s governance, compensation plans and programs. The N&G Committee oversees management of risks relating to the Company’s nominating and corporate governance functions. The Audit Committee, the Enterprise Risk ManagementERM Committee, the Compensation Committee and the HRCGN&G Committee report to the Board as appropriate on matters that involve specific areas of risk that each committee oversees, and with the Board, each committee periodically discusses with management the Company’s policies with respect to risk assessment and risk management. The board of directors of our primary subsidiary, HomeStreet Bank, also oversees certain risks specific to HomeStreet Bank, including credit, liquidity, interest rate and price risk, through various committees of the HomeStreet Bank board, including joint audit, ERM, Compensation and N&G committees as well as credit and finance committees.
Environmental, Social and Governance Matters
ESG Oversight
At the Board level the N&G Committee’s purpose, duties and responsibilities include oversight of our human capital management and ESG programs, policies and practices. The N&G Committee’s oversight of our ESG programs, policies and practices includes oversight of any climate-related programs, policies and practices, unless delegated to another committee of the Board. The N&G Committee’s specific duties and responsibilities with respect to ESG include monitoring and evaluating the Company’s programs, policies and practices relating to ESG issues and making recommendations to the Board regarding the Company’s overall strategy with respect to ESG matters. In addition, we have established an ESG Management Steering Committee comprised of senior management members including the Chief Executive Officer. The purpose of the ESG Management Steering Committee is to assist the N&G Committee in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities with respect to ESG matters, which oversight responsibilities include oversight of climate-related matters, unless delegated to another committee of the Board. We expect to published our inaugural ESG report to our website in April of 2023 and we continue to examine the ESG topics that are most relevant to our business as we advance our ESG strategy.
Human Capital Management

As a financial institution, HomeStreet Bank holds a valued position in the community, among its customers and employees, and with its regulators. Since 1921, the Company has earned the trust of customers, employees and regulators through our effective management and deep community involvement thereby developing a reputation for reliability, fairness, honesty and integrity. Our reputation is directly tied to the individual decisions, actions and sense of business ethics of each and every one of our employees. We believe a high level of trust gives us a competitive advantage in an environment that is increasingly sensitive to business ethics. It is our belief that employees and customers are attracted to work for, and do business with, a company that prides itself on maintaining the highest ethical standards. For all these reasons, a commitment to fairness, honesty, integrity and community service are core values of the Company.

HomeStreet’s Culture Committee has identified five key pillars built on specific behaviors that bring our values to life: a focus on customers, collaboration as one team, delivering excellence, embodying a spirit to serve the communities that we are in and being engaged in our work in a manner that we describe as “All In.” In 2022, the Culture Committee met regularly to discuss ways to promote our inclusive work environment and support our recruiting efforts to extend outreach to historically marginalized groups such as biracial and people of color, veterans and individuals with disabilities. Our Employee Resource Groups also met regularly, allowing for collaborative environments where employees can freely discuss social issues they or others may be dealing with and ways to better extend a culture of inclusion throughout our organization.
22



As part of our goal of providing high-quality banking and financial services to our customers while creating a positive impact in the local communities in which we do business, we designed our total rewards program with the intention of attracting and retaining highly qualified employees. We use a mix of base salary, cash-based short-term incentive plans and defined contributions to the 401(k) plans for participating employees to incentivize our employees classified as exempt employees, and also provide equity-based long-term incentive compensation for members of the management team who are senior vice president and above. Employee performance is considered, evaluated and discussed through quarterly performance check-ins between manager and direct report, while those employees eligible for short-term annual incentives also have an annual performance review. Our non-exempt employees are paid hourly wages with overtime benefits along with defined contributions to the 401(k) plan for participating employees. We have a variety of group benefit programs designed to provide our employees with health and wellness benefits; financial benefits in the event of planned or unplanned expenses, or losses relating to illness, disability, death; retirement benefits; and programs to deal with job-related or personal problems.
As part of our employee development program, we provide a variety of training and educational opportunities to help our employees stay current on regulatory compliance issues and develop their professional skills. We use an online learning management system to create, assign and track compliance and professional development learning programs across many topical areas such as banking, mortgage and regulatory education, technology training, public speaking and proactive communication, and development of strong customer relationship and customer service skills.
Diversity, Equity and Inclusion

HomeStreet values diversity, equity and inclusion and is an equal opportunity employer, committed to a diverse workplace with employees from a wide range of backgrounds and individual characteristics: including race, ethnicity, sex, gender, sexual orientation or identity, disability, religion, age, national origin, military or veteran status, marital status, religion, use of service animal, or other characteristics. Diversity also includes differences in backgrounds, experiences, perspectives, thoughts, interests, and ideas. As a result of our diverse Company, we believe that our employees will have greater job satisfaction, higher levels of trust and better engagement, which in turn translates to happier and more engaged employees with a greater capacity for customer service and a deeper connection to our strategic plan, ultimately providing greater value to shareholders over the long term. HomeStreet works hard to ensure that our employees are given opportunities to be heard, engaged and involved at work and have meaningful opportunities to collaborate, contribute, and grow in their careers. HomeStreet focuses on recruiting, retaining and promoting employees from diverse backgrounds and who are representative of the people in the communities we serve. By doing so, we believe we are better able to serve our customers and understand their financial needs and goals. HomeStreet’s Culture Committee helps management identify ways to increase and promote opportunities for our employees. The Culture Committee works with management to identify and promote practices that will help us achieve a more diverse and inclusive workplace. We also promote policies and practices to combat harassment, discrimination, retaliation, or disrespectful or other unprofessional conduct based on an individual’s identity, including sex, gender, sexual orientation, race, religion, color, ancestry, physical disability, mental disability, age, marital status, and other protected classifications.
Employee Community Involvement

HomeStreet supports the active involvement of our employees in supporting their communities. Employees who donate blood receive one paid day off from work for each donation. Additionally, employees are given time off to volunteer for community organizations, and where employees make a substantial commitment of time to a particular organization, HomeStreet offers an additional financial contribution to those organizations in recognition of the commitment of our employees. We also create active partnerships with hundreds of local organizations, and our employees provide leadership, educational support, hands-on service, expertise and financial support to those organizations. We focus primarily on organizations within the scope of the Community Reinvestment Act that provide support for housing, basic needs and economic development for those of low and
23


moderate income. Our senior management also helps to educate our employees on the importance of our community responsibility focus and strategies.
Environmental Sustainability
As part of its oversight responsibilities, HomeStreet’s ESG Management Steering Committee plans to examine and assess potential environmental sustainability measures and initiatives, including certain climate-related measures and initiatives, such as greenhouse gas emission measurement and reduction, water use and conservation, waste generation and recycling, and energy efficiency measures. To address these potential measures and initiatives effectively and efficiently, HomeStreet’s ESG Management Steering Committee has formed a Climate and Environment Working Group that includes members from the supply chain and facilities departments. The Climate and Environment Working Group is responsible for the implementation of HomeStreet’s overall strategy with respect to environmental sustainability matters, including certain climate-related matters, with direction and oversight provided by the ESG Management Steering Committee.
Information Security Risks
The Board oversees the Company’s cyber risk management program through the ERM Committee which is tasked with oversight of risk issues, including cybersecurity and information security risks, and is comprised entirely of independent directors. Our Chief Information and Operations Officer and Chief Information Security Officer, who oversee our information security program and our vendor management program, have led the way to develop programs and policies designed to address and respond to security incidents and cyberattacks in order to protect and preserve the confidentiality, integrity and availability of information owned by, controlled by or in possession of the Company and our vendors, including the Company’s proprietary, sensitive and confidential information and the information of our customers, employees and affiliates. These programs and policies are reviewed and updated on a regular basis, and the implementation of such programs and policies is overseen by those officers along with our Information Security Program Office.

Certain of these programs and policies address incident response processes, including a cyber incident response plan, with controls and procedures designed to provide for the timely and accurate investigation and reporting of cybersecurity incidents as required by applicable legal obligations, including the reporting of material cybersecurity incidents. The ERM Committee receives quarterly reports from the Chief Information and Operations Officer, the Chief Information Security Officer and Chief Risk Officer as well as interim reports on noteworthy cybersecurity events and the impact, if any, on the Company. The Board and the ERM Committee also periodically receive updates about the results of exercises and response readiness assessments led by internal staff as well as outside advisors who provide a third-party independent assessment of our cybersecurity and information security technical program and our internal response preparedness. The ERM Committee regularly briefs the full Board on these matters, and the full Board also receives periodic briefings on cyber threats to enhance our directors’ literacy on cybersecurity issues.

The ERM Committee has engaged a cybersecurity expert to work closely with the ERM Committee to provide external review of our cybersecurity-related policies and processes and to provide training and advice on cybersecurity and information security matters. The ERM Committee often presents the expert's materials to the full Board to update all directors on cybersecurity and information security risks. Our employees are required to receive periodic training in cybersecurity and information security risk management and mitigation through corporate training courses and regular phishing exercises. We maintain an additional insurance policy designed to help defray the potential costs of losses associated with cybersecurity incidents.
Employee Compensation Risks
HomeStreet’s management and the HRCGCompensation Committee have assessed the risks associated with our compensation policies and practices for all employees, including non-executive officers. Based on the results of this assessment, we do not believe that our compensation policies and practices for allany employees, including non-executive officers, create excessive risks or other risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on HomeStreet.
24


Board Meetings and Committees
During the year ended December 31, 2015,2022, the Board held 1214 meetings. Each of our directors attended or participated in 75% or more of the aggregate of the total number of meetings of the Board and the total number of meetings held by all committees of the Board on which that director served during the past fiscal year.
The Board of Directors has threefive standing committees: an Executive Committee, an Audit Committee, an Enterprise Risk ManagementERM Committee, a Compensation Committee and a N&G Committee.

2022 Committee Memberships of Directors of HomeStreet, Inc.

The following table indicates the current membership of each committee.

DirectorExecutive CommitteeAudit CommitteeNominating and Governance CommitteeCompensation CommitteeERM Committee
Mark K. Mason, ChairmanChair
Scott M. Boggsüüü
Sandra A. CavanaughüüüChairü
Jeffrey D. GreenChairü
Joanne R. HarrellChairüü
James R. Mitchell, Jr.üüü
Mark R. Pattersonüü
Nancy D. PellegrinoüüChair

In 2022, we split the Human Resources and Corporate Governance Committee (the “HRCG Committee”) of the Board into two separate committees: the Compensation Committee and the N&G Committee. The purpose and scope of the new N&G Committee includes oversight of our human capital management (“HCM”) and ESG programs, policies and practices. The Compensation Committee is charged with oversight of our compensation functions. Prior to this split, the HRCG Committee met 4 times.




Executive Committee

The Executive Committee Membershipis composed of Directorsat least three members of HomeStreet, Inc.

DirectorAudit CommitteeHuman Resources and Corporate Governance CommitteeEnterprise Risk Management Committee
David A. Ederer, Chairman EmeritusX
Mark K. Mason, Chairman
Scott M. BoggsChairX
Timothy R. ChrismanX
Victor H. IndiekX
Thomas E. KingXX
George “Judd” KirkX
Douglas I. SmithXChair
Donald R. VossXChair
Bruce W. Williams (1)
X
(1) Mr. Williams will retirethe Board, a majority of whom are required to be and are independent directors as determined by the Board. The Chairman of the Board serves as the Chair of the Executive Committee. The Executive Committee is delegated authority to act on behalf of the Board on certain matters that are not otherwise delegated to another committee of the Board in between regularly scheduled Board meetings. The Executive Committee is not authorized to take any action that cannot be delegated by the Board under Washington law and is also expressly not authorized to adopt any agreement for merger or consolidation, recommend to shareholders the sale, lease or exchange of all or substantially all of the Company’s assets, recommend a dissolution of the Company (or the revocation of a dissolution) to the shareholders, amend the Bylaws, elect officers, fill vacancies on the Board, declare a dividend, or authorize the issuance of stock (other than pursuant to specific delegation from the Board of Directors effective aswhere the Board has already approved the issuance and the Executive Committee is approving certain details of the 2016 Annual Meeting.issuance), all of which are expressly reserved to the full Board. The Executive Committee held one meeting during the year ended December 31, 2022.

Audit Committee
The
Our Audit Committee of HomeStreet, Inc. is composed solely of independent directors as required by the Nasdaq corporate governance standards, and each of Messrs. Boggs, Smith, Voss and Williamsthe members of the Audit Committee meets the independence requirements set forth in all applicable Nasdaq corporate governance standards, including independence requirements for audit committee members, and Rule 10A-3 under the Exchange Act. The Board has determined that both Mr. Boggs is alsoand Mr. Green are qualified as an “audit committee financial expert.”
The Company’s
25



Our Board of Directors has adopted a written Audit Committee charter that meets the requirements of the applicable Exchange Act rules and the applicable Nasdaq corporate governance standards. A copy of this charter is availablecan be found on our website at investor relations website: http://ir.homestreet.com.ir.homestreet.com. Among other things, the Audit Committee charter requires the Audit Committee to:

oversee the financial reporting process on behalf of our board of directors,Board, review and discuss the audited financial statements, including significant financial reporting judgments, with management and the Company’s auditors and report the results of its activities to the board;Board;

be responsible for the appointment, retention, compensation, oversight, evaluation and termination of our auditors and review the engagement and independence of our auditors;

review and approve non-audit services including a reconciliation of fees actually paid for non-credit services as compared to fees previously approved for such services;our independent registered public accounting firm;

review the adequacy of our internal accounting controls and financial reporting processes;

approve and monitor our internal audit plans and policies;

annually review the performance compensation and independence of our Chief Audit Officer; and

annually evaluate the performance of the Audit Committee and assess the adequacy of the Audit
Committee charter.

The Audit Committee of the Company meets jointly with the Audit Committee of HomeStreet Bank. The Audit Committee held 10 meetings during the last fiscal year. The Audit Committee Report is included in this Proxy Statement.

year ended December 31, 2022.


Enterprise Risk Management Committee

The membership of the Enterprise Risk ManagementERM Committee is limited to persons who meet the independence standards established by the Nasdaq corporate governance rules and is currently comprised solely of independent directors as defined by such rules. The Enterprise Risk ManagementERM Committee overseesof the Company meets jointly with the ERM Committee of HomeStreet Bank, and assessestogether they oversee and assess the adequacy of the Company'sCompany’s tolerance and management of key enterprise-wide risks, including credit, interest rate, risk, liquidity, price, operational, compliance/legal, strategic and reputational risks. The Enterprise Risk ManagementERM Committee is also responsible for monitoring the Company'sCompany’s risk profile and exposure to various types of risks, including cybersecurity and information security risks, as well as reviewing management’s adherence to the Company'sCompany’s established risk management policies and benchmarks. As with other committees of the Company, the ERM Committee is authorized to hire such independent experts as the committee may deem necessary or appropriate, and at present engages a cybersecurity and information security legal expert to help with oversight and assessment of the Company’s risks in those areas. The Enterprise Risk ManagementERM Committee is required to meet at least quarterly.
The
Our Board has adopted a written Enterprise Risk Management Committee charter a currentfor the ERM Committee. A copy of which is availablethis charter can be found on our website at investor relations website: http://ir.homestreet.com. Among other things, this charter requires the Enterprise Risk ManagementERM Committee to:

define, in conjunction with the Board and management, the Company’s risk appetite and tolerances for risk offor the Company and its subsidiaries;Company;

annually review and approve the Company’s enterprise risk assessments prepared in connection withas a component of the Company’s strategic plan, including the capital plan;

monitor the implementationCompany’s risk profile and ongoing and potential exposure to material risks of changes in significant regulations andvarious types, including a review of the impact of such changes upon the Company’s significant risks;
monitor overall capital adequacy and capacity within the context of the approved risk limits and actual results;
26



provide a forum for evaluating and integrating risk issues, processes and events arising within the Company and its subsidiaries;

coordinate with various Board committees a discussion of the Company’s significant processes for risk assessment, risk management and actions taken by management to monitor, control and remediate risk exposures;

oversee compliance and fair lending practices, including:

review regulatory examinations and reports;

monitor the implementation of any corrective measures;

review and approve the Company’s Compliance Management System, Fair Lending Policy and other compliance policies as deemed necessary;

approve the initial appointment of the Chief Compliance Officer and Fair Lending Officer and ratify/affirm such appointment annually;

monitor the implementation of changes in significant regulation and the impact upon significant risk(s) throughout the Company;

oversee information technology, and corporate security and physical security practices, including:

reviewing reports from management on technology and security risks; and

appointing the Security Officer and Chief Information Security Officer;

review and approve, at least annually, risk related policies; and

review the performance, compensation and independence of the EnterpriseChief Risk Management Director.Officer.

The Enterprise Risk ManagementERM Committee held 4four meetings during the last fiscal year.year ended December 31, 2022.
Human Resources and Corporate Governance
Compensation Committee
The HRCG Committee acts as both our nominating and corporate governance committee and our compensation committee. The HRCG Committee has the authority to establish and implement our corporate governance practices, nominate individuals for election to the board of directors and evaluate and set compensation with respect to our directors and executive officers, among other things. As of the date of this Proxy Statement, the HRCG
Our Compensation Committee is composed solely of independent directors under Nasdaq corporate governance rules, each of whom has also been determined to be independent pursuant to Rule 10C-1(b)(1) of the Exchange Act describing independence standards relating to members of thea compensation committee. During 2015 we made certain payments to a company controlled by Director Timothy R. Chrisman, who serves onAlthough the HRCGCompensation Committee however, in light ofreceives input from our Chief Executive Officer, executive leadership and the amounts and circumstances relating to those payments,Compensation Committee’s independent compensation advisor, the Board has determined that such payments did not impair the independence of the affiliated director. For more on that relationship, see “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions” below.

Compensation Committee makes its own independent determinations regarding executive officer compensation.


Our Board of Directors has adopted a written charter for the HRCGCompensation Committee that satisfies the applicable standards of Nasdaq Corporate Governance rules as to both compensation and nominating committee requirements. A copy of this charter is availablecan be found on our website at investor relations website: http://ir.homestreet.com.ir.homestreet.com. Among other things, this charter calls upon HRCGrequires the Compensation Committee to:
develop and recommend to the Board criteria for identifying and evaluating candidates to become Board and committee members;
identify, review the qualifications of, and recruit candidates for election to the Board;
assess the contributions and independence of incumbent directors in determining whether to recommend them for reelection to the Board and appointment to one or more committees of the Board;
function as a compensation committee for the purpose of Nasdaq Listing Rule 5605(d);
select and recommend to the Board director nominees for election or reelection to the Board at each annual meeting of shareholders;
develop and recommend to the Board a set of corporate governance principles applicable to the corporation, including periodic review and reassessment of such principles;
make recommendations to the Board concerning the structure, composition and functioning of the Board and its committees;
review and assess the channels through which the Board receives information, and the quality and timeliness of the information received;
oversee the evaluation of the Board and its committees;
review and recommend changes as appropriate to the Board in the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, and biannually review this Code;
review and oversee the Company’s overall compensation structure, philosophy, policies benefit plans and programs, (including for directors and management) and assess whether the Company’s compensation structure establishes appropriate incentives for management and employees;

review and approve the incentive plan arrangements as they are developed, added or modified for (1) the senior management team; (2) individual employees, including non-executive employees, whose activities may expose the Company to material amounts of risk; and (3) groups of associates who are subject to the same or similar incentive compensation arrangements and who, in the aggregate, may
27


expose the Company to material amounts of risk, even if no individual associate is likely to expose the Company to material risk;

review the Company’s incentive compensation arrangements to determine whether they encourage excessive risk taking, and review and discuss at least annually the relationship between risk and management policies and practices and compensation, and evaluate compensation policies and practices that could mitigate such risk;

approve, amend or modify the terms of any compensation or benefit plan that does not require shareholder approval;

review and approve the corporate goals and objectives relevant to the compensation of the Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”),CEO, evaluate the CEO’s performance in light of those goals and objectives, and recommend to the independent directors the CEO’s compensation level based on this evaluation. The CEO cannot be present during any voting or deliberations by the HRCG on his or her compensation;evaluation;

oversee, review and approve the evaluation of Bankother executive officers, including the performance of executive officers in light of approved goals and objectives, and set the compensation of suchthe other executive officers based on this evaluation review;

periodically review and approve the companies included in the compensation peer group (the “Peer Group”) based on criteria the Compensation Committee deems appropriate;

review and approve the design of other benefit plans subject to Board approval pertaining to executive officers and employees;

review the compensation of directors for service on the Board and its committees at least annually and recommend changes in compensation to the Board;

make recommendations to the Board with respect to the Company’s incentive-compensation and equity-based compensation plans that are subject to Board approval;

approve stock option and other stock incentive awards for executive officers;

monitor compliance by executive officers and directors with the Company’s stock ownership guidelines requirements, if any;

review, approve and recommend to the Board, employment agreements and severance agreementsarrangements for executive officers, including change-in-control provisions, plans or agreements;agreements, which includes the ability to adapt, amend and terminate such agreements or arrangements;

review and discuss with management the Company’s Compensation Discussion and Analysis and related disclosures, recommend to the Board based on the review and discussions whether the Compensation Discussion and Analysis should be included in the annual report and proxy statement, and prepare the compensation committee report required by SEC rules for inclusion in the Company’s annual report and proxy statement; and

review succession plans relating to positions held by executive officers,Executive Vice Presidents and make recommendations to the Board regarding the selection of individuals to fill these positions.

The HRCGCompensation Committee of the Company meets jointly with the Compensation Committee of HomeStreet Bank. The Compensation Committee held 10five meetings during the last fiscal year.year ended December 31, 2022. The HRCGCompensation Committee Report is included in this Proxy Statement.

28


Interaction with Consultants

Pursuant to its charter, the HRCGCompensation Committee has the authority, in its sole authoritydiscretion, to select, retain terminate,and obtain the advice from,of a compensation consultant, legal counsel or other advisors. The Compensation Committee shall set the compensation and oversee and compensate its outside advisors, includingthe work of any compensation consultant, legal counsel or other advisors. The Company shall provide appropriate funding, as determined by the Compensation Committee for payment of compensation to its compensation consultant. consultants, legal counsel and any other advisors.

The Company has provided appropriate funding authority to the HRCGCompensation Committee to do so.
In November 2012, the HRCG Committee retainedretains Pearl Meyer & Partners (“PM&P”Pearl Meyer”) as its independent executive compensation consultant. None of the Company’s management participated in the Compensation Committee’s decision to retain PM&P. PM&PPearl Meyer. Pearl Meyer reports directly to the HRCGCompensation Committee and the HRCGCompensation Committee may replace PM&PPearl Meyer or hire


additional consultants at any time. PM&PPearl Meyer attends meetings of the HRCGCompensation Committee, as requested, and communicates with the Chair of the HRCGCompensation Committee between meetings; however, the HRCGCompensation Committee makes all decisions regarding the compensation of the Company’s executive officers.
PM&P
Pearl Meyer provides various executive compensation services to the HRCGCompensation Committee with respect to HomeStreet’s executive officers and other key employees pursuant to a written consulting agreement with the HRCGCompensation Committee. The services PM&PPearl Meyer provides under the agreement include advising the HRCGCompensation Committee on the principal aspects of HomeStreet’s executive compensation program, and evolving best practices given the Company’s particular circumstances, and providing market information and analysis regarding the competitiveness of HomeStreet’s program design and HomeStreet’s award values in relationship to its performance.

The HRCGCompensation Committee regularly reviews the services provided by its outside consultants and believes that PM&PPearl Meyer is independent in providing executive compensation consulting services. The HRCGCompensation Committee conducted a specific review ofperiodically monitors the Company’s relationship with PM&P at the time of their initial engagement in 2012Pearl Meyer with regard to, among other things, the requirements of Nasdaq rules related to the selection and assessment of conflicts of interest pertaining to compensation consultants and determined that PM&P’sPearl Meyer’s work for the HRCGCompensation Committee did not raise any conflicts of interest.
The HRCG Committee continues to monitor the independence of its compensation consultant on a periodic basis.
Human Resources and Corporate GovernanceCompensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
None of the
Mses. Cavanaugh (Chair), Harrell and Pellegrino and Mr. Mitchell serve as members of the HRCGCompensation Committee served as anand none of them is a current or former officer or employee of the Company during fiscal year 2015 or any of the three previous years or has had any relationships or participated in any related party transactions that qualify as “interlocking” or cross-board memberships that are required to be disclosed under the rules of the SEC. See alsoDuring the “Certain Relationshipsyear ended December 31, 2022, none of our executive officers served as a director or member of the compensation committee (or other committee of the board performing equivalent functions) of another entity where an executive officer of such entity served as a director of HomeStreet.

Nominating and Related Transactions” sectionGovernance Committee

The N&G Committee has the authority to establish and implement our corporate governance practices, nominate individuals for election to the Board, evaluate and oversee issues related to management of human capital resources, among other things. Beginning in 2021, the N&G Committee received reports from the Company’s Community Relations and Diversity Equity & Inclusion Officer at least two times a year to increase oversight of and involvement in the management of our human capital resources.

Our Board has adopted a written charter for the N&G Committee that satisfies the applicable standards of Nasdaq Corporate Governance rules as to nominating committee requirements. A copy of this Proxy Statement.charter can be found on our investor relations website: http://ir.homestreet.com. Among other things, this charter requires the N&G Committee to:

develop and recommend to the Board criteria for identifying and evaluating director candidates;
29



identify, review the qualifications of, and recruit candidates for election to the Board;

assess the contributions and independence of incumbent directors in determining whether to recommend them for reelection to the Board and appointment to one or more committees of the Board;

periodically review the procedures for the consideration of Board candidates recommended for the N&G Committee’s consideration by the Company’s shareholders contained in the Company’s Shareholder Engagement Procedures and Practices and recommend any changes to such procedures to the Board;

recommend to the Board the Company’s candidates for election or reelection to the Board at each annual meeting of shareholders;

recommend to the Board candidates to be elected by the Board as necessary to fill vacancies and newly created directorships;

develop and recommend to the Board a set of corporate governance principles, and annually review and recommended changes as appropriate to such principles;

review and recommend changes as appropriate to the Board in the Code of Ethics, and biannually review this code;

make recommendations to the Board concerning the structure, composition and functioning of the Board and its committees;

recommend to the Board candidates for appointment to Board committees and consider periodically rotating directors among the committees;

review and recommend to the Board retirement and other tenure policies for directors;

review directorships in other public companies held by or offered to directors and senior officers of the Company;

review and assess the channels through which the Board receives information, and the quality and timeliness of the information received;

develop and oversee an orientation program for new directors and a continuing education program for all directors and review and revise such programs as appropriate;

oversee the evaluation of the Board and its committees;

monitor and evaluate the Company’s programs, policies and practices and relevant risks and opportunities relating to ESG issues and related disclosures, and make recommendations to the Board regarding the Company’s overall strategy with respect to ESG matters;

oversee the Company’s engagement with proxy advisory firms and other stakeholders on ESG matters and review shareholder proposals submitted to the Company that are within the purview of the N&G Committee; and

review with management the Company’s practices, policies and strategies relating to human capital management, including but not limited to practices, policies and strategies regarding recruiting, talent development and retention, culture, diversity, equity and inclusion and human health and safety.

The N&G Committee charter allows the committee to delegate its duties and responsibilities related to nomination and corporate governance to a subcommittee of the N&G Committee that consists of not less than two members of the N&G Committee.
30



The N&G Committee held three meetings during the year ended December 31, 2022.

Process for Recommending Candidates for Election to the Board of Directors

The HRCGN&G Committee is responsible for, among other things, determining the criteria for membership to the Board and recommending candidates for election to the Board. It is the policy of the HRCGN&G Committee to consider recommendationsfor candidates to the Board from shareholders. Shareholder recommendationsfor candidates to the Board must be directed in writing to HomeStreet, Inc., 601 Union Street, Suite 2000, Seattle, Washington 98101, Attention: General Counsel and Corporate Secretary, and must include the candidate’s name, home and business contact information, detailed biographical data and qualifications, information regarding any relationships between the candidate and the Company within the last three years and evidence of the nominating person’s ownership of the Company’s common stock. Such recommendationsmust also include a statement from the recommending shareholder in support of the candidate, particularly within the context of the criteria for Board membership, including issues of character, judgment, diversity, age, independence, background, skills, expertise, corporate experience, length of service, other commitments and the like, personal references, and an indication of the candidate’s willingness to serve. Nominees for our Board of Director must also meet any approval requirements set forth by our regulators.

The HRCGN&G Committee regularly reviews the current composition and size of the Board. The HRCGN&G Committee’s criteria and process for evaluating and identifying the candidates that it recommends to the full Board for selection as director nominees are as follows:

In its evaluation of director candidates, including the members of the Board eligible for re-election, the HRCGN&G Committee seeks to achieve a balance of knowledge, experience and capability on the Board and considers (1)the current size and composition of the Board and the needs of the Board and the respective committees of the Board, (2)such factors as issues of character, integrity, judgment, diversity of experience, independence, area of expertise, corporate experience, length of service, potential conflicts of interest, other commitments and the like, and (3)such other factors as the HRCGN&G Committee may consider appropriate.



In addition to the criteria listed above, the Board and N&G Committee have made our commitment to diversity on the Board a priority. Our Principles of Corporate Governance include a mandate that the N&G Committee actively seek to include highly qualified women and individuals from minority groups in the pool of candidates from which nominees for director positions are chosen, and in choosing between equally qualified candidates to give extra weight to the diversity of the candidates.

While we have not established specific minimum qualifications for director candidates, we believe that candidates and nominees must reflect a Board of Directors that is comprised of directors who: (1)are predominantly independent, (2)are of high integrity, (3)have broad, business-related knowledge and experience at the policy-making level in business or technology, including their understanding of the Company’s business in particular, (4)have qualifications that will increase the overall effectiveness of the Board and (5)meet other requirements as may be required by applicable rules, such as financial literacy or financial expertise with respect to audit committee members.
The N&G Committee evaluates all nominees appropriately submitted, regardless of source of recommendation, using the same rigorous evaluation process and criteria.

With regard to candidates who are properly recommended by shareholders or by other means, the HRCGN&G Committee will review the qualifications of any such candidate, which review may, in the HRCGN&G Committee’s discretion, include interviewing references for the candidate, direct interviews with the candidate, requesting additional information to be shared with our regulators or other actions that the HRCGN&G Committee deems necessary or proper.

31


In evaluating and identifying candidates, the HRCGN&G Committee has the authority to retain and terminate any third-party search firm that is used to identify director candidates and has the authority to approve the fees and retention terms of any search firm.

The HRCGN&G Committee will apply these same principles when evaluating Board candidates who may be elected initially by the full Board to fill vacancies or add additional directors prior to the annual meeting of shareholders at which directors are elected.

After completing its review and evaluation of director candidates, the HRCGN&G Committee recommends the director nominees to the full Board.

Attendance at Annual Meetings of Shareholders by the Board of Directors
Although HomeStreet does not have a formal policy regarding attendance by members
Our Principles of the Board atCorporate Governance provide that, absent unusual circumstances, our directors are expected to attend our annual meeting of shareholders, we encourage, but do not require, directors to attend.shareholders. All nine of our directors then serving on our Board virtually attended our last2022 annual meeting held in May 2015.of shareholders.

Insider Trading Policy and Rule 10b5-1 Trading Plans

HomeStreet has adopted an insider trading policy thatInsider Trading Policy applicable to our directors, officers, employees and consultants. Our Insider Trading Policy prohibits, among other things, short-term trading, short sales, hedging of stock ownership positions and transactions involving derivative securities relating to our common stock. Thestock and hedging transactions. Under our Insider Trading Policy, directors, officers, employees and consultants are prohibited from trading in Company does not undertake any obligation to reportstock when in possession of material nonpublic information about the Company. Furthermore, our Insider Trading Plan includes guidelines regarding the use of Rule 10b5-1 trading plans that maywhich require them to be adopted by any of its officers and directorscompliant with Rule 10b5-1, as amended in the future, or to report any modifications or terminations of any publicly announced plan, except to the extent required by law.2022.

Contacting the Board of Directors
Any shareholder who desires to contact
Our Board of Directors has adopted the HomeStreet, Inc. Shareholder Engagement Practices and Procedures, a copy of which can be found on our non-employee directors may do so electronically at the followinginvestor relations website: http://ir.homestreet.com. Such shareholdersir.homestreet.com. Shareholders who desire to contact our non-employee directors by mail may do so by writing HomeStreet’s Corporate Secretary at HomeStreet, Inc., 601 Union Street, Suite 2000, Seattle, Washington 98101 or by sending an email to corporatesecretary@homestreet.com.

Shareholders can also communicate with independent directors as a group through the Company’s investor relations website at http://ir.homestreet.com; by email at ir@homestreet.com; or by mail to the attention of the Independent Directors c/o the Corporate Secretary at HomeStreet, Inc., 601 Union Street, Suite 2000, Seattle, Washington 98101. Any communications so received will be collected and organized by the Corporate Secretary and will periodically, but in any event prior to each regularly scheduled Board meeting, be reported and/or delivered to the independent directors.

Our Corporate Secretary receives these communications unfiltered by HomeStreet, forwards communications to the Board, individual directors or the appropriate committee of the Board or non-employee director, and facilitates an appropriate response. The Board will generally respond, or cause the Company to respond, in writing to bona fide communications from shareholders addressed to one or more directors. The Corporate Secretary will not forward spam, junk mail, mass mailings, customer complaints or inquiries, job inquiries, surveys, business solicitations or advertisements, or patently offensive or otherwise inappropriate materials to the Board or any directors. Correspondence relating to certain of these matters such as customer issues may be distributed internally for review and possible response.

Please note that requests for investor relations materials should be sent to ir@homestreet.com.

Director Compensation
Current
Non-Employee Director Compensation
For 2015, non-employee directors of HomeStreet, Inc. and the Bank each earned an annual retainer of $40,000, while committee chairs each earned an additional annual retainer of $10,000 for each committee chaired. David Ederer, who served as the chairman of the HomeStreet, Inc. Board of Directors for the first three months of 2015 and chairman emeritus for the remainder of 2015 earned an additional annual retainer of $20,000, and Scott Boggs, who served as the lead director of HomeStreet Bank beginning in March 2015, earned an annual retainer in that role of $10,000. In addition, each non-employee director earned a fee of $1,000 per board meeting attended (other than



32


for short, telephonic board meetings for which the fee was $500 per meeting), and each non-employee committee member earned an additional fee of $500 per committee meeting attended (other than for short, telephonic committee meetings, for which the fee was $250 per meeting attended). Fifty percent of the annual retainer was paid in cash and the remaining fifty percent was paid in common stock under our 2014 Equity Incentive Plan. All meeting fees were paid in cash. Beginning in 2016, while the amount of compensation earned by directors will remain the same, each director will have the option to have up to 100% of their fees paid in stock of the Company under the 2014 Equity Incentive Plan. Mark Mason, who has served as chairman since March 2015, is an executive of the Company is not paid any additional retainer or compensation for his services as a director and chairman. 
We believe that our current overall non-employee director compensation program and the director compensation program in effect in 2015 are reasonable and appropriate based on our review of peer financial institution data and the data provided by our outside compensation consultants.
Prior to the end of the first fiscal quarter of 2015, only Messrs. Boggs, Chrisman, Ederer, Indiek, King and Kirk served as outside directors of HomeStreet Bank. Those directors received separate compensation for their service as directors of the Bank based on the director compensation policy of the Bank. Beginning in April 2015, all directors of the Company also serve as directors of HomeStreet Bank. Director compensation for 2022 was unchanged from 2021. We believe that our overall non-employee director compensation program is reasonable and appropriate based on our review of Peer Group financial institution data and the Bankdata provided by Pearl Meyer, the Compensation Committee’s independent external compensation consultant.

For 2022, our non-employee directors were paid an annual retainer of $90,000, with a minimum of 50% of that fee being paid in fully vested stock (subject to any individual director’s election to receive more of the fees in fully vested stock, up to 100% of all fees). Committee chairs of the Compensation Committee, N&G Committee, Audit Committee and do not receive anyERM Committee earned an additional compensation$15,000 annual retainer. Chairs of the Bank’s Finance Committee and Credit Committee earned an additional $10,000 annual retainer. The Lead Independent Director received an additional annual retainer of $30,000. Each non-employee director also earned a fee of $500 per committee meeting attended for all committees (or $250 in the case of short, telephonic meetings) other than the Executive Committee. Members of the Executive Committee were paid an additional annual retainer of $10,000 for their service as directorson that committee in lieu of per-meeting fees.

In each case, annual retainer fees (including the retainer for membership on the Executive Committee) are paid one-half in cash and one-half in fully vested stock, subject to any individual director’s election to receive more than 50% of such fees in stock (up to 100%). Meeting fees are paid in cash, subject to any individual director’s election to receive any portion of such fees in fully vested stock (up to 100%). Directors are also able to elect to receive some or committee membersall of their stock compensation in the form of fully vested deferred stock awards that are settled upon the termination of their service on the Board or at another future date of the Bank.director’s choosing. All fees are paid on a quarterly basis, and fees that are paid in fully vested stock or deferred stock awards are granted under the 2014 Plan. The number of shares or deferred stock awards granted in 2022 was determined based on dividing the amount of fees to be paid by the average price of the Company’s common stock over the prior 20 trading days. We believe this approach reduces volatility in award levels based on daily stock price fluctuations.
Directors’ Deferred Compensation Plan
In 1999, we adopted a planDirector Stock Ownership Guidelines

Our Principles of Corporate Governance contain stock ownership guidelines pursuant to permit directorswhich each non-executive director is expected to deferown shares of the Company’s common stock totaling at least three (3) times the annual retainer fee, valued at the closing price of the common stock on the date of acquisition, (the “Minimum Ownership Level”) at all times from and after the third anniversary of such director’s appointment or a portionelection to the Board until the end of their fees received for servicessuch director’s service to the Company as a director that would otherwise be payable in cash (with a minimum $2,500 deferral in a plan year for those who electdirector. Directors are not required to make such deferrals). Interest earned on participant deferrals is equalacquire additional stock to increase their holdings to the average five year daily treasury rate forMinimum Ownership Level in the quarter. A participantevent of a decline in the stock value. However, if a sale or other transfer from a director’s account results in the director owning less than the Minimum Ownership Level in shares of the Company’s common stock, the director is then required to re-establish his or her beneficiary will begin receiving a distributionMinimum Ownership Level. Stock received by non-executive directors as part of histheir director compensation may be counted toward the accumulation of the Minimum Ownership Level. As of March 31, 2023, all directors who have been on the Board for three years or her deferrals for a particular plan year uponmore are in compliance with our stock ownership guidelines, measured based on the earliest of (1)a future date specified by the participant, (2)the participant’s deathor (3)the date the participant ceasesannual retainer fee paid to be a director. The form of payment includes either a single lump sum payment or annual installment payments over a period of up to ten years. The participant has a limited ability to change these elections. This plan was suspended from 2008 through 2012 due to HomeStreet’s financial condition. As a result, none of our directors were participants in this plan for the year ended December 31, 2012. The plan was reintroduced on January 1, 2013; however, no directors participated in the plan for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2013, 2014 or 2015.2022.

Compensation for Employee Directors

Employee directors do not receive compensation for serving on our BoardBoard. Accordingly, Mark K. Mason, who serves as Chairman and is an executive of Directors.the Company, is not paid any additional retainer or compensation for his services as a director and Chairman.

33


2022 Director Compensation Table

The following table shows the compensation earned by or paid to, our non-employee directors for 2015, including Donald R. Voss, who joined the Board of Directors in March 2015, and Michael Malone, who resigned from the Board of Directors at the end of February 2015. This table includes2022.

Name
Fees Earned or Paid in Cash ($) (1)
Stock Awards ($) (2) (3)
Total ($)
Scott M. Boggs60,250 50,000 110,250 
Sandra A. Cavanaugh65,48155,481120,962 
Jeffrey A. Green65,00052,500117,500 
Joanne R. Harrell54,24246,242100,484 
James R. Mitchell, Jr.59,98147,981107,962 
Mark R. Patterson72,94363,942136,885 
Nancy D. Pellegrino54,75045,00099,750 
Douglas I. Smith (4)
69,00056,250125,250 
Donald R. Voss (5)
32,76928,26961,038 

(1)The following directors elected to receive all compensation earned or paid to all directors who were on our Board of Directors during anya portion of 2015.

their cash fees in stock (either fully vested stock grants or fully vested deferred stock units): Mr. Green, $52,500; Ms. Harrell, $38,242; Ms. Pellegrino, $54,750; and Mr. Smith, $69,000.


Name
Fees Earned or Paid in Cash
($)
Stock Awards
(4)(5)
($)
Option
Awards
($)
Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation
($)
Change in Pension Value and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings
($)
All Other Compensation
($)
Total
($)
 
Scott M. Boggs58,25033,75092,000
Timothy R. Chrisman(1)
42,50023,750    66,250
David A. Ederer51,462.4526,25077,712.45
Victor H. Indiek49,00023,75072,750
Thomas E. King52,75025,00077,750
George “Judd” Kirk50,00022,50072,500
Michael J. Malone (2)
5,333.503,333.508,667
Douglas I. Smith45,00023,75068,750
Donald R. Voss (3)
40,91720,417    61,334
Bruce W. Williams37,00020,00057,000
(1)Does not include any compensation received by Chrisman & Company, an entity controlled by Mr. Chrisman. For more on the payments made to Chrisman & Company, please see the discussion in “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions” below.
(2)Mr. Malone resigned from the Board of Directors in February 2015.
(3)Mr. Voss joined the Board of Directors in March 2015.
(4) (2)The amounts shown represent the aggregate grant date fair value for the stock awards granted in fiscal 2015, as determined in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718 (“FASB ASC Topic 718”). For details of all assumptions made in such calculations, see Note 16 to our financial statements filed with our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015.2022.
(5) (3)Stock awards granted to non-employee directors in fiscal 20152022 consist of (a) shares of common stock granted quarterly to our non-employee directors as part of their individual annual retainer.

retainer or (b) deferred stock units that settle on the earlier of a date chosen by the director electing to receive such deferred stock units or the date such director ceases service on the Board.

(4)Retired from his service as a director in March 2023.
(5)Stock Awards consisted entirely of fully vested deferred stock units that were settled for shares of HomeStreet stock upon termination of service as a director.
34


EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
The names of the executive officers and key employees of HomeStreet Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiary HomeStreet Bank, their ages, their positions with the Company and theHomeStreet Bank and other biographical information as of April 21, 2016,March 31, 2023 are set forth below, except for the biographical information for Mr. Mason, which is included above under Proposal“Proposal 1 — Election of Directors.Directors” on page 12 of this Proxy Statement. There are no family relationships among any of our directors or executive officers.


NameAgeAgePosition at HomeStreet Inc.Position at HomeStreet Bank
Mark K. Mason5663Chairman, Chief Executive Officer, President
Chairman, Chief Executive Officer,
President
Melba BartelsJohn M. Michel54Senior 63Executive Vice President, Chief Financial OfficerSenior Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
Richard W.H. Bennion66Executive Vice PresidentExecutive Vice President, Residential Construction and Affiliated Businesses
Rose Marie David52Senior Executive Vice President, Mortgage Lending Director
William D. Endresen6168Executive Vice President, Commercial Real Estate (Interim)and Commercial Capital President
Godfrey B. Evans6269Executive Vice President, General Counsel, Chief Administrative Officer and Corporate SecretaryExecutive Vice President, General Counsel, Chief Administrative Officer
and Corporate Secretary
Susan GreenwaldErik D. Hand5757SeniorExecutive Vice President, Single FamilyResidential Lending Operations Director
Jay C. IsemanTroy D. Harper5755Executive Vice President, Chief RiskInformation and Operations Officer and Chief Credit OfficerExecutive Vice President, Chief RiskInformation and Operations Officer and
Jay C. Iseman63Executive Vice President, Chief Credit OfficerExecutive Vice President, Chief Credit Officer
Paulette Lemon6067Executive Vice President, Retail Banking Director
David H. StrausParr6952Senior Executive Vice President, Director of Commercial Banking
Pamela J. Taylor64Executive Vice President, Human Resources DirectorExecutive Vice President, Human Resources Director
Darrell S. van Amen5057Executive Vice President, Chief Investment Officer & TreasurerExecutive Vice President, Chief Investment Officer & Treasurer

Melba Bartels, SeniorJohn M. Michel, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer. Ms. BartelsOfficer of HomeStreet, Inc. and HomeStreet Bank. Mr. Michel joined HomeStreet in August of 2015May 2020 as our Executive Vice President, and Chief Financial OfficerOfficer. His duties include the management of treasury, financial reporting, management reporting, financial planning, and was promotedtax. Prior to Senior Executive Vice President in November 2015. Ms. Bartels was previously thejoining HomeStreet, Mr. Michel had over 25 years of experience as a chief financial officer or senior finance officer at financial institutions and specialty finance companies, including most recently as Chief Financial Officer of Auto and Student Lending at JPMorgan ChaseFirst Foundation, Inc., from December 2011 to June 2015.2007 through 2020. Prior to that, Ms. Bartels served as the Senior Vice President of Finance for Chase Auto Finance from June 2009 to December 2011. Ms. Bartelshis tenure in such roles, he was a senior manager at Deloitte, Haskin & Sells. Mr. Michel holds a Masters of Business Administration and a bachelor of scienceBA in Accounting from the University of Washington School of Business.
Richard W.H. Bennion, Executive Vice President of HomeStreet, Inc.; Executive Vice President, Residential Construction and Affiliated Businesses.Mr. Bennion joined HomeStreet in 1977 and currently serves as the Bank’s Executive Vice President and Residential Lending Director. He has been a member of the Fannie Mae Western Business Center Advisory Board since 2004, Chair of the Housing Partnership, a nonprofit organization, from 2001 to 2007 and a member of the University of Washington Tacoma Milgard School of Business Advisory Board since 2004. Mr. Bennion is the past director of the Homebuilders Association of Tacoma-Pierce County, the past director and president of Puget Sound Mortgage Lenders Association and Washington Mortgage Lenders Association. Mr. Bennion holds a bachelor’s degree in History and China Regional Studies from the University of Washington and a masters of business administration from the University of WashingtonNotre Dame and is a graduate of the School of Mortgage Banking.Certified Public Accountant — California (inactive).



Rose Marie David, Senior Executive Vice President, Mortgage Lending Director. Ms. David joined HomeStreet Bank in March 2012, coming from MetLife Home Loans where she was Pacific Northwest Regional Sales leader from 2011 to 2012 andNon-Producing Seattle District Manager from 2006 to 2011. She was promoted to Senior Vice President and Retail Mortgage Production Leader of HomeStreet Bank in August 2012, Executive Vice President for Single Family Lending in 2013 and Senior Executive Vice President for Single Family Lending in 2015. In that role, Ms. David is responsible for growing the residential mortgage banking franchise and oversees mortgage production, operations and servicing. Prior to working at MetLife Home Loans, she owned a mortgage brokerage for several years, moving to First Horizon with the sale of her brokerage. Ms. David holds a B.A. in finance from the University of Utah.
William D. Endresen, Executive Vice President, Commercial Real Estate (Interim)and Commercial Capital President of HomeStreet Bank. Mr. Endresen ishas been a 40-year veteran of the commercial lending industry whofor over 40 years. He joined HomeStreet Bank in in March 2015 as Executive Vice President of Commercial Real Estate and President of the HomeStreet Commercial Capital division offor HomeStreet Bank.  In April 2015, Mr. EndresenBank and was promoted to his current position (pending approval of the Federal National Mortgage Association in relation to our participation in the Designated Underwriting and Servicing Program)April 2016 to lead the combined commercial real estate lending and operation teams of theHomeStreet Bank. Prior to joining HomeStreet Bank, Mr. EndresenHe was founder and president of IMPAC Commercial Capital Corporation. He built IMPAC’s small balance commercial and multifamily lending program into a national platform with closings in 44 states. Mr. Endresen was also SVP Managing Director of Fidelity Federal Bank from 1999-20021999 to 2002 until the sale of the bank. Mr. Endresen foundedbank and wasthen returned to the position of president of IMPAC Commercial Capital Corporation from 2002 until 2015. In 1996, Mr. Endresen founded IMPAC Commercial Capital Corporation, a private company that originates small balance multifamily loans through brokers on a wholesale basis, and IMPAC Commercial Holdings, (publiclya publicly traded REIT)real estate investment trust, and he served as president of those entities from 1996 to 1999. Mr. Endresen studied business at Fullerton College.
35


Godfrey B. Evans, Executive Vice President, General Counsel, Chief Administrative Officer and Corporate Secretary of HomeStreet, Inc. and the Bank. HomeStreet Bank. Mr. Evans joined HomeStreet in November 2009 as Executive Vice President, General Counsel Chief Administrative Officer and Corporate Secretary. In March 2010, Mr. Evans was also named Chief Administrative Officer. Mr. Evans is responsible for the delivery and management of all legal services to theHomeStreet Bank and the Company, administrative management oversight of the Corporate and Real Estate Service Group, Compliance(1) Risk and Regulatory Affairs Department (2) Human Resources and (3) the Community Relations Group. Mr. Evans has a total of over 20 years of experience as a general counsel of public companies. Prior to joining the executive team at HomeStreet, Mr. Evans was the managing director of the bankruptcy and restructuring practice group at Marshall& Stevens beginning in 2008. Mr. Evans served as interim general counsel and chief restructuring officer for Chapeau, Inc., a cogeneration manufacturing company, from 2008 to 2009. From 2002 to 2008, Mr. Evans served as a practicing attorney and as a project professional for Resources Global Professionals.Professionals, and from 1987 to 2002, served as executive vice president, chief administrative officer, general counsel and corporate secretary for Fidelity Federal Bank and its publicly traded holding companies, Bank Plus Corporation and Citadel Holding Corporation. Mr. Evans began his law practice at Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP where he practiced from 1982 to 1987. Mr. Evans is admitted to practice law in California and in Washington, D.C. Mr. Evans holds a bachelor’s degree and a master’s degree in Architecturearchitecture from the University of California, Berkeley and a law degreejuris doctorate from Loyola Law School in Los Angeles.
Susan C. Greenwald, Senior
Erik D. Hand, Executive Vice President, Single Family OperationsResidential Lending Director, of HomeStreet Bank. Ms. GreenwaldMr. Hand joined theHomeStreet Bank in 19842019 and currently serves as Senior Vice President, Single Family Operationsthe bank’s executive vice president and Residential Lending Director. Ms. Greenwald began her career atIn his current role Mr. Hand leads the residential lending production, operations, and servicing areas for the bank. Prior to joining HomeStreet, Mr. Hand was president and chief executive officer of Penrith Home Loans, a mortgage joint venture between HomeStreet Bank as aand Windermere Real Estate with offices throughout the Pacific Northwest, from May 2011 to February 2019. Mr. Hand has been employed in the mortgage industry since 1988 and has extensive experience in loan production, operations, and secondary marketing assistantat both the executive and has served inoperations level. He is a numberpast board member of lending-related management roles. Ms. Greenwald has also served as a director and treasurer of Common Ground and a legislative and legal affairs committee member ofthe Seattle Mortgage Bankers Association which is now known(SMBA) and has served as the Washington Mortgage Lenders Association. Ms. Greenwald has been apast treasurer and board member of Washington Mortgage Lenders Association since approximately 1985the Outdoors for All Foundation. Mr. Hand studied political science at the University of Colorado.
Troy D. Harper, Executive Vice President, Chief Information and Operations Officer of HomeStreet, Inc. and HomeStreet Bank.   Mr. Harper joined HomeStreet Bank in our corporate information security department in 2013. He was promoted to Senior Vice President, Chief Information Officer in June 2015, further promoted to Executive Vice President, Chief Information Officer of the Company and HomeStreet Bank in November 2017 and again promoted in December 2022 to Executive Vice President, Chief Information and Operations Officer. In his role as Chief Information Officer and Operations Officer, Mr. Harper is an active participant on various industry committees. Sheresponsible for the delivery and management of Information Technology Services and Business Systems Support, Corporate Security and Corporate Information Security for the Company and HomeStreet Bank, as well as oversight of loan operations, deposit operations and corporate real estate. In his 25 years of technology management for financial institutions, Mr. Harper worked for the FDIC, held CIO and divisional CIO roles for Pierce Commercial Bank and CGI Group, and provided management consulting and technology outsourcing services with Deloitte Consulting LLP. Mr. Harper holds a bachelor’s degree in Economicsfinance and accounting management from Southern Oregon State College.Northeastern University.
Jay C. Iseman, Executive Vice President, Chief Risk Officer and Chief Credit Officer of HomeStreet, Inc. and theHomeStreet Bank.Mr. Iseman joined theHomeStreet Bank in August 2009 and currently serves as the Executive Vice President and Chief Credit Officer of the Company and the Bank and, as ofHomeStreet Bank. From January 2016 through November 2017, Mr. Iseman also servesserved as Chief Risk Officer of the Company and theHomeStreet Bank. Prior to his current position and since joining the Company in 2009, Mr. Iseman has served as HomeStreet Bank’s Senior Vice President, Credit Administration and Vice President, Special Assets Group and OREO Group Manager and Income Property Credit Administrator. Mr. Iseman served as senior vice president and senior portfolio manager of commercial special assets with Strategic Solutions, Inc., a subsidiary of Bank of America between 2008 and 2009. Mr. Iseman holds a bachelor’s degree in Business Administrationbusiness administration and Economicseconomics from Seattle Pacific University and a certificate of advanced study in International Financeinternational finance and Marketingmarketing from the Thunderbird School of Global Management.


36


Paulette Lemon, Executive Vice President, Retail Banking Director of theHomeStreet Bank.  Ms. Lemon joined theHomeStreet Bank in 1985. Prior to her promotion to Executive Vice President, Retail Banking Director of theHomeStreet Bank in 2015, Ms. Lemon served from 2001 as Senior Vice President, Retail Banking Director and as Vice President, Retail Bank Operations Manager prior to 2001. She holds a bachelor’s degree in Business Administrationbusiness administration from Western Washington University and she graduated with honors from the National School of Banking through Fairfield University. She is also on the board of directors of Childhaven, a non-profit organization.
David H. Straus, SeniorParr, Executive Vice President, Director of Commercial Banking Director of theHomeStreet Bank.  Mr. Straus, who has more than 40 years of banking experience,Parr joined HomeStreet Bank in November 2013. Before joining HomeStreet Bank, Mr. Straus founded Fortune Bank, a community bank headquartered in Seattle, in 2006.December 2002. Prior to that, Mr. Straus held various executive leadership positions including President of Business Banking for Washington at Wells Fargo from 2003 to 2006 and President and Chief Operating Officer at Pacific Northwest Bank, a $3 billion commercial bank headquartered in Seattle, from 2002 to 2003. Prior to his experience at Pacific Northwest Bank and Wells Fargo, Mr. Straus also served in multiple leadership roles at First Interstate and Old National Bank/U.S. Bancorp. Mr. Straus is a past Chairman of the Washington Bankers Association and formerly served as a member of the board of United Way of King County. He is the past board chairman of Pioneer Human Services, past president of Risk Management Associates and past board member of the Boys and Girls Club of King County. Mr. Straus is a graduate of University of Denver and received a Master of Business Administration from the University of Arizona. In addition, he is a graduate of Pacific Coast Banking School and Leadership Tomorrow of King County.
Pamela J. Taylor, Executive Vice President, Human Resources Director. Ms. Taylor joined the Bank in 1998 as Senior Vice President and Human Resources Director and was promotedpromotion to Executive Vice President in September 2020, Mr. Parr held multiple positions within the Commercial Banking Group including Vice President, Senior Relationship Manager, Regional Team Lead and Human Resources Director of both the Bank and the Company in 2015. SheSenior Vice President, Regional President for Western Washington/Greater Portland. He holds a senior professional human resource certification from the Society for Human Resource Management and a bachelor’s degree in Englishbusiness administration from California StateWestern Washington University Northridge. Prior to joining HomeStreet, Ms. Taylor served as Executive Vice President, Human Resource Director for MetLife Capital Corporationwell as honor roll achievement from 1986 to 1998. Ms. Taylor is an advisorya graduate level program in banking from Pacific Coast Banking School. Mr. Parr actively serves as a board member foron the Seattle American Cancer Society, and a past member of the following organizations: Human Resource committee of the board of the YMCA, University of Washington Extension Program Advisory Committee, Board ofMilgard Business School Executive Council for the University of Washington Executive Development ProgramTacoma, as well as a board member and curriculum committeeguest classroom lecturer on the Veterans Incubator for Leadership Tomorrow.Better Entrepreneurship at the University of Washington Tacoma. He also serves on the Government Relations Committee for the Washington Bankers Association.

Darrell S. van Amen, Executive Vice President, Chief Investment Officer and Treasurer of HomeStreet, Inc. andthe HomeStreet Bank. Mr. van Amen joined theHomeStreet Bank in 2003 and currently servessince 2010 has served as Executive Vice President and Treasurer of theHomeStreet Bank as welland since 2012 as Executive Vice President and Chief Investment Officer and Treasurer of the Company, a position he assumed in 2012.Company. Prior to his current position with theHomeStreet Bank, he was the Vice President, Asset/Liability Manager and Treasurer of theHomeStreet Bank and the Company from 2003 to 2010. Mr. van Amen is also a director of Habitat for Humanity.Humanity Seattle/King County and serves on the Seattle University Advisory Board. He holds a bachelor’s degree in Economicseconomics from Weber State University and a master’s degree in Economicseconomics from Claremont Graduate University.
The current terms of the executive officers will expire at such time as their successors are elected.



37


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
We are an “Emerging Growth Company,” as defined in the Jumpstart
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
Introduction
Our Business Startups Act, or “JOBS Act”, and are eligible to take advantage of certain exemptions from various reporting requirements that are applicable to other public companies that are not Emerging Growth Companies. These include, but are not limited to, reduced disclosure obligations regarding executive compensation inprogram is designed to attract and retain individuals with the skills and qualifications to manage and lead the Company effectively. The overarching goal of our proxy statements, includingprogram is to motivate our leaders to contribute to the requirementachievement of our financial goals and to include a specific form offocus on long-term value creation for our shareholders.
In this Compensation Discussion and Analysis (“CD&A”), we review the objectives and elements of the Company’s executive compensation program and discuss the 2022 compensation earned by our named executive officers listed below (“NEOs”). It also describes the process followed by the Compensation Committee for making pay decisions, as well as exemptionsits rationale for specific decisions related to 2022.
2022 Named Executive Officers
NameTitle
Mark K. MasonChairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
John M. MichelExecutive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
William D. EndresenExecutive Vice President, Commercial Real Estate and Commercial Capital President
Godfrey B. EvansExecutive Vice President, General Counsel, Chief Administrative Officer and Corporate Secretary
Darrell S. van AmenExecutive Vice President, Chief Investment Officer and Treasurer
Executive Summary
2022 Business Highlights

Our financial results in 2022 were adversely impacted by the historically significant increase in short-term interest rates by the Federal Reserve during 2022. This dramatic increase in rates last year resulted in significant reductions in loan demand, particularly in single family mortgage. Accordingly, our loan volume and gain on loan sales activities declined significantly from certain2021 levels. Additionally, our interest sensitive deposits declined as customers moved funds to higher yielding products both at our Bank and at other banks and brokerage firms. Attractive rates on Treasury securities and non-bank money market funds have also created meaningful competition. These pressures on our funding base have resulted in reductions in our net interest margin. Our earnings in 2022 were $66.5 million or $3.49 per share, as compared to $115.4 million and $5.46, respectively in 2021. Our return on average equity, return on average tangible equity (“ROATE”) and our core return on average tangible equity in 2022 were 10.8%, 11.5% and 10.9%, respectively. The high interest rate environment contributed to a reduction in our net interest margin, decreasing from 3.38% in 2021 to 2.99% in 2022 as the increases in rates paid on our interest-bearing liabilities were more than the increases in yields on our interest earning assets. As a result of the higher interest rate environment, we experienced a significant decrease in loans sold in 2022, resulting in a $75 million decrease in net gain on loan origination and sales activities.

Our performance during the year resulted in under performance of HomeStreet’s share price compared to the industry. HomeStreet’s total shareholder return for 2022 was (45)% compared to the total return for the KBW Regional Bank Index (“KRX”) of (7)%. We repurchased 1.5 million shares during the first quarter of 2022, or 7.3% of total shares outstanding, at an average price per share of $50.97. During 2022, we paid cash dividends of $1.40 per share.

2022 Financial Results
Net income for 2022 was $66.5 million;
Return on average equity, return on average tangible equity ("ROATE") and our core ROATE in 2022 were 10.8%, 11.55% and 10.9% respectively (1);
Return on average assets ("ROAA") and core ROAA was 0.79% and 0.75%, respectively (1);
38


Efficiency ratio was 72.4% (1);
The ratio of nonperforming assets to total assets was 13 basis points;
Our core deposits (defined as total deposits less certificates of deposit) decreased by 9%;
As of December 31, 2022, our capital ratios were well in excess of regulatory requirements underto be considered "well capitalized":
Tier 1 Leverage Ratio of 7.25% and 8.63% at the Dodd-Frank Act, includingCompany and HomeStreet Bank, respectively.
Total Risk-Based Capital Ratio of 11.53% and 12.59% at the requirementCompany and HomeStreet Bank, respectively; and
Book value per share and tangible book value per share decreased from $35.61 and $34.04 (1), respectively as of December 31, 2021 to hold$30.01 and $28.41(1), respectively, as of December 31, 2022 due primarily to changes in accumulated other comprehensive income.
(1)See Appendix A for a non-binding advisory vote onreconciliation with the most comparable GAAP financial measure.
2022 Executive Compensation Highlights
The Compensation Committee made the following executive compensation decisions for fiscal 2022:
Base Salaries: Base salaries were reviewed for all NEOs in February 2022 as part of our annual enterprise-wide performance review process. Messrs. Mason, Michel, Endresen, Evans and van Amen each received a 3.0% increase. All base salary increases were effective in early March 2022. The resulting average increase in base salary for all NEOs was 3.0%.
2022 Annual Incentives: We maintain a short-term, cash-based incentive plan for non-commissioned officers called the Annual Incentive Plan (“AIP”). The performance levels in 2022 were based on comparisons to the actual results of our Peer Group. Based on our 2022 financial performance, the corporate component of the AIP attained 12.2% of target performance, which resulted in a below target payout for that component of the AIP. Our commissioned NEO is eligible for incentive awards under a separate arrangement, as discussed below. For details about payouts, please see page 50 of this Proxy Statement.
Long Term Incentives:  In 2022, the NEOs were awarded long-term incentive awards in the form of 50% time-based restricted stock units (“RSUs”) which vest ratably over three years and 50% performance-based share units (“PSUs”), which may cliff-vest depending on total shareholder return. PSUs for the 2020-2022 performance measurement period, for which vesting was based on total shareholder return, had no payout because results did not meet the established threshold. For details about long term incentive awards, please see page 51 of this Proxy Statement.
2022 Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation
Approximately 98% of the votes cast (for and against) were voted in favor of our 2021 named executive officer compensation. Based on this high approval rating and the requirement to obtain stockholder approval of any golden parachute payments not previously approved. We have elected to comply with the scaled disclosure requirements applicable to Emerging Growth Companies.
Compensation Program Objectives and Philosophy
We believe it is critical to the Company’s success to attract, retain and incentivize highly qualified executives and to promote a high-performance culture. We have therefore adopted compensation policies thatfeedback we received from our investors generally in 2022, we believe reward executives for achieving and maintaining short- and long-term performance that builds shareholder value. The principles underlyingour shareholders are supportive of our executive compensation program, and made no material changes to our executive compensation program for 2022.
Summary of Executive Compensation Practices
Our executive compensation program includes the following practices and policies, which we believe promote sound compensation governance and programs include:are in the best interests of our shareholders and NEOs:
provide levels ofCompensation Philosophy and Practices
Our executive compensation competitive with those offered by our peers and competitors and consistent with our level of performance;program is designed to achieve the following objectives:
attract and retain the most qualified and experienced individuals available to further our success;
alignAlign the interests of executives and shareholders by linking a significant portion of an executive’sexecutive compensation to the Company’s short-short-term and long-term financial performance; andperformance.
reward
39



Reward and motivate appropriate executive behavior that produces strong financial results, while managing risks and promoting regulatory compliance.
This philosophy pertainsAttract and retain the most highly qualified and experienced individuals available to executivefurther the Company’s success.
Provide levels of compensation as well as employeecompetitive with those offered by our peers and competitors, which are consistent with the Company’s level of performance.

These objectives serve to assure our long-term success and are built on the following compensation at all other levels throughout our organization.principles:
Notwithstanding our overallExecutive compensation objectives, incentiveis managed from a total compensation opportunities for specific individuals may vary based on a numberperspective (i.e., base salary, short- and long-term incentives, and retirement are reviewed together).
All elements of factors, including competing compensation programs available for similar positions, scope of duties, tenure, specialized experience, institutional knowledge and performance. We believe a portion of each executive’s potential compensation should be tied to individual performance as evaluated byreviewed against the HRCG Committeetotal compensation packages of a Peer Group, which includes banks of similar assets and the Chief Executive Officer (other than for our Chief Executive Officer, whose performance is evaluated solely by the HRCG Committee). business lines.
In addition we believe a meaningful portionto Peer Group information, each NEO’s experience level, skills, scope of responsibility and performance must be factored into the decision for compensation.
Long term incentives play an important role in retaining key talent.
40


Elements of the Executive Compensation Program
The three main elements of the Company’s executive compensation program are base salary, short-term incentives, and long-term incentives, each executive’s total compensation opportunity should be linked to our long-term company-wide goals of safety and soundness, increased shareholder value and risk management. Actual compensation in a given year will varywhich is described below:

Compensation
Element
Fixed or
At-Risk
FrequencyCash or
Equity
PurposeKey Feature
Base SalaryFixedAnnualCashTo attract and retain the best talent and recognize individual talentReviewed against individual’s performance, contributions and length of service, and market data from a group of similarly situated industry peers
Short-term incentives:
Annual Incentive
Plan Award
(non-commissioned officers only)
At-RiskAnnualCashTo motivate performance to meet near-term goalsCEO and CFO incentive earned based on 80% corporate results and 20% individual results. All other non-commissioned NEOs earn incentive based on 50% corporate results and 50% individual results.
Commission AwardsAt-RiskAnnual/Quarterly/MonthlyCashTo incentivize key business leaders to generate profitable quality loans for HomeStreet BankShort-term commissions are earned based on loan volume and profitability. Earned by our commissioned NEO in lieu of Annual Incentive Plan Awards, these payments are calculated and paid monthly.
Long-term incentives:
PSUsAt-RiskAnnualEquityMotivates and incentivizes sustained performance over the longer term that is comparable to or exceeds our Peer GroupTotal annual long-term incentive award is 50% PSUs measured over three years against a performance goal set at the beginning of the performance period, subject, except in cases of retirement after age 65, to the executive’s continued employment through the applicable vesting date.
RSUsFixedAnnualEquityAligns interests of our NEOs with those of our shareholders as the value of RSUs is dependent on our stock price. Also supports our leadership retention objectives.Total annual long-term incentive award is 50% RSUs, which vest ratably over three years, subject, except in cases of retirement after age 65, to the executive’s continued employment through the applicable vesting date.

Total Direct Compensation
The charts below show the target compensation levels based primarily on the attainment of operating goals, the Company’s overall performance, and changes in shareholder value. In some instances, the amount and structure of compensation results from arm’s-length negotiations with executives, which terms reflect an increasingly competitive market for proven expertise and managerial talent. We design our compensation programs and make individual pay decisions and adjustments in the context of this philosophy.
Decision Making and Policy Making
The HRCG Committee is responsible for setting the policies and compensation levels for our directors and Named Executive Officers and for determining themaximum total direct compensation of our Chief Executive Officer. See “Corporate Governance-HumanCEO, non-commissioned NEOs and commissioned NEO for fiscal year 2022. These charts illustrate that a significant portion of target total direct compensation is performance or at-risk based (67% for our CEO and an average of 52% for our non-commissioned NEOs and 81% for our commissioned NEO).

The 2022 compensation mix for our CEO is shown below.

41


CEO Pay Mix Final.gif

The average 2022 compensation mix for our Non-Commissioned NEOs (Messrs. Michel, Evans, and van Amen) is shown below:

NEO Non Com Pay Mix Final.gif
42


The 2022 compensation mix for our Commissioned NEO (Mr. Endresen) is shown below:

NEO COM Pay Mix final.gif


The Decision-Making Process
Role of the Compensation Committee.

The Human Resources and Corporate Governance Committee.” Certain membersCommittee handled Company compensation-related matters as a delegate of seniorthe Board through April 27, 2022 after which the Compensation Committee was created. The Compensation Committee oversees the executive compensation program for our NEOs. The Compensation Committee works very closely with its independent, external compensation consultant and with management includingto examine the Chief Executive Officer, Chief Human Resources Officer,effectiveness of the Company’s executive compensation program from year to year. Details of the Compensation Committee’s authority and General Counsel regularly participateresponsibilities are specified in the HRCGCompensation Committee’s charter, which may be accessed at our website, https://ir.homestreet.com.
Pearl Meyer, acting as the Company’s independent, external compensation consultant, provides peer market data to the Compensation Committee process for compensating Named Executive Officers. Executive officers in attendance may provide their insights and suggestions, but only independent committee members may vote on decisions regarding executiveas requested to evaluate the annual compensation and executive officers are excluded from deliberations regarding their own compensation. In particular, the Chief Executive Officer provides recommendations relating to other executive officers; however, after the HRCGof our NEOs. The Compensation Committee reviews and discussesapproves recommendations from the Chief Executive Officer’sCEO for the other NEOs compensation

and reviews the elements of CEO compensation in executive session. At the Compensation Committee’s request, the HR Director may attend the executive session to answer questions from the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee makes all final compensation and equity award decisions regarding our NEOs except for the CEO, whose compensation is determined by the independent members of the full Board, based upon recommendations of the Compensation Committee.

Role of the CEO
with him, finalThe CEO is not present during deliberations and all votes regardingvoting of the Compensation Committee for purposes of determining his compensationown compensation.
43


The following recommendations are made to the Compensation Committee by the CEO for each NEO, which is assessed alongside peer market data and trends:
Base salary adjustments, taking into account the NEO’s individual performance and experience and role within the Company and Peer Group data.
Performance metrics, award schedule and target amounts for short-term opportunities under our Annual Incentive Plan and commission plans, with performance metrics being set relative to the projected business cycle and strategic business plan.
Long-term incentive awards, including developing and providing specific recommendations on the types of awards to be granted annually, the performance measures, threshold, target and maximum performance metrics of such awards.
Use of Independent Consultants and Advisors
The Compensation Committee continued to engage Pearl Meyer as its independent, external compensation consultant during 2022. Pearl Meyer provides executive and board compensation consulting services and other consulting services to the Compensation Committee and does not provide any other services to the Company. The Compensation Committee has assessed the independence of Pearl Meyer pursuant to the SEC and Nasdaq rules, and the Company concluded that Pearl Meyer’s work for the Compensation Committee did not raise any conflict of interest and that Pearl Meyer met the applicable independence requirements. The primary responsibilities of the independent, external compensation consultant were to:
Provide the Compensation Committee with independent and objective market data;
Conduct a Board compensation analysis;
Conduct compensation analysis for NEOs;
Provide assistance in reviewing the CD&A;
Review incentive plans design and changes;
Provide advice on compensation strategy and potential risks associated with compensation plan designs; and
Review and advise on pay programs and pay levels as needed.
These services are provided as requested by the Compensation Committee throughout the year.
The Role of Benchmarking and Market Data

The companies comprising the Peer Group are reviewed and approved periodically by the Compensation Committee to assess continued relevance with input provided to the Compensation Committee by the independent, external compensation consultant. The companies comprising the Peer Group are selected based on the following general considerations and financial parameters at the time of selection:
Size Characteristics:

Total assets: within approximately 0.5x to 2.5x HomeStreet’s total assets
Total revenues: within approximately 0.5x to 2.5x HomeStreet’s total revenues
Select banks such that HomeStreet is positioned reasonably among the peers when balancing the above criteria

Geography:
Preference given to companies in the Western United States
Consideration of banks further east if their size and business model characteristics are compelling
Operations:
44


Generally, a reasonably similar loan mix, compared to HomeStreet

Two Peer Groups approved by the Compensation Committee informed NEO compensation decisions and incentive plan outcomes for 2022:

2021 Peer Group: The Compensation Committee approved a Peer Group of 14 companies for the purpose of conducting an executive session, withoutcompensation benchmarking analysis in July of 2021, which was used to inform decisions regarding NEO 2022 base salaries and target incentive opportunities.
2022 Peer Group: In late 2021, the Chief Executive Officer present. Compensation Committee approved a Peer Group of 15 companies for determining relative financial performance outcomes under our 2022 Non-Commissioned Incentive Plan Awards, as discussed below. This Peer Group was also approved for the purpose of conducting an executive compensation benchmarking analysis in October of 2022, which will be used to inform decisions regarding NEO 2023 base salaries and target incentive opportunities.

These Peer Groups consisted of the following companies:

2021 Peer Group2022 Peer Group2021 Peer Group2022 Peer Group
Banc of California, Inc.XXGlacier Bancorp, Inc.X
Banner CorporationXXHeritage Commerce Corp.XX
Brookline Bancorp Inc.XHeritage Financial CorporationXX
Central Pacific Financial Corp.XXLakeland Bancorp IncX
Columbia Banking System, Inc.XLuther Burbank CorporationXX
CVB Financial Corp.XXNational Bank Holdings CorporationXX
First Foundation, Inc.XXPeaPack-Gladstone Financial CorporationX
First Interstate BancSystem, Inc.XTriCo BancsharesXX
Flushing Financial Corp.XWashington Federal, Inc.XX

The committee also ordinarily reviews recommendationsCompensation Committee eliminated Columbia Banking System, Inc., First Interstate BancSystem, Inc. and input from compensation consultants regarding executive officers’ compensation. Participation levelsGlacier Bancorp, Inc., which were included in all incentive programsthe Peer Group used for our Chief Executive Officer and2021 compensation review, from the 2022 Peer Group as these banks announced acquisitions where they significantly increased in total assets. The average total assets of our two other most highly compensated executive officers (collectively referred toPeer Group as the “Named Executive Officers”) are established by the HRCG Committee at the beginning of each fiscal year. These participation levels may be increased or decreased after the beginning of a fiscal year at the discretionDecember 31, 2022 was $10.5 billion compared with our total assets as of the committee. However, it has been the practicesame date of the HRCG Committee to do so only in the event of a material change in an executive officer’s responsibilities. In establishing incentive plan participation levels, the HRCG Committee considers market data relating to compensation practice$9.4 billion. The average total revenues of our peers as well as internal parity. We do not follow formal guidelinesPeer Group for establishing internal parity, but we do seek to correlate organizational responsibility2022 was $358 million compared with participation level.our total revenues of $285 million.
Summary Components of
The Compensation
Currently, the compensation package for our Named Executive Officers is comprised of Committee establishes base salary, an annualsalaries, short-term cash incentive plan,awards, and long-term, equity-based incentive awards on a case-by-case basis for each NEO taking into account, among other things, individual and Company performance, experience, length of service, market data, advancement potential, recruiting needs, internal equity, opportunity awards, a 401(k) plan, healthretention requirements, unrealized equity gains, succession planning and welfare benefits plancurrent compensation governance practices. Compensation is intended to be competitive with our peers and perquisites.compensate commensurate with knowledge, skills, abilities, experience and track record as they relate to the market median.
45



2022 EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION PROGRAM
Base Salary
Base salaries are provided for each Named Executive Officer for performing specific job responsibilities, giving considerationsalary represents annual fixed compensation and is a standard element of compensation necessary to attract and retain executive leadership talent. In making base salary decisions, the knowledge, skills, abilities and experience of each executiveCompensation Committee considers the CEO’s recommendations, as well as competitiveeach NEO’s position and level of responsibility within the Company. The Compensation Committee also takes into account factors such as the NEO’s individual performance, experience, contributions and length of service, and relevant market pay. Mr. Mason’s base compensation was $500,000 for 2014 and $550,000 for 2015. Ms. David earned adata. The Compensation Committee determined the appropriate annual base salary of $200,000 per annumrate, effective March 2022, for each of 2014NEO as follows:

NEO2022 Base
Salary ($)
2021 Base
Salary ($)
%
Adjustment
(1)
Mark K. Mason798,252 775,000 3.0 %
John M. Michel456,820 443,379 3.0 %
William D. Endresen401,700 390,000 3.0 %
Godfrey B. Evans336,050 326,306 3.0 %
Darrell S. van Amen373,880 362,972 3.0 %
(1)The Company took a stratified approach to merit increases for all employees in 2022. This approach was based, in part, on actions taken by competitors in our markets and 2015. Ms. Bartelsin part based on responses to inflationary pressures. The stratification provided merit increase opportunities based on annualized base pay levels, with merit increase opportunities ranging from 3% for senior roles to 10% for entry level roles. All NEOs received a base salary3% adjustment, the minimum level of $325,000 per year upon her hire date in August 2015.adjustment.
Short-Term Incentive Compensation
HomeStreet maintains the Performance-Based Annual Incentive Plan (the “Annual Incentive Plan”)Cash Incentives
All of our NEOs are eligible to provide employees withreceive incentive awards, upon the attainment of pre-defined annual performancewhich are intended to focus executives on short-term financial and strategic goals that are designed to aligncontribute to long-term value.
The non-commissioned NEOs are eligible employees with the short-term objectives of HomeStreet. Mr. Mason and Ms. Bartelsto participate in the Annual Incentive Plan. Ms. David participates inPlan, which provides an opportunity to receive an annual incentive compensation planaward that is different from thecontingent on achieving pre-defined annual corporate objectives, as well as individual goals which target their respective areas of responsibility. The Commissioned NEO is eligible for annual incentive awards under a separate arrangement, which provides for incentive payout opportunities based on business unit performance results.
Non-Commissioned Incentive Plan Awards
The Annual Incentive Plan provided our non-commissioned NEOs with the opportunity to earn a performance-based annual cash incentive award. Actual bonus payouts depend on the achievement of pre-established performance objectives and can range from 0% to 150% of target award amounts.
Target annual incentive opportunities are expressed as a percentage of base salary and were established by the Compensation Committee for 2022 based on the NEO’s level of responsibility and his or her ability to impact overall results. The Compensation Committee also considers comparable market data in setting target award amounts. The 2022 target award opportunities in terms of percentage of salary for the non-commissioned NEOs were as follows:

46


Non-Commissioned NEO(1)
Target
Opportunity
as % of Base
Salary
Mark K. Mason100%
John M. Michel60%
Godfrey B. Evans45%
Darrell S. van Amen45%
(1)The target opportunities for Messrs. Mason, Michel, Evans and van Amen were unchanged from the 2021 levels.
Actual awards for the CEO are assessed by the Compensation Committee based on performance against corporate financial goals and individual performance. Actual awards for the other non-commissioned NEOs are based on the achievement of corporate or business unit financial goals and individual performance objectives as assessed and recommended by the CEO and approved by the Compensation Committee. For 2022, the Compensation Committee established the following balance between corporate and individual goals:
Non-Commissioned NEO Corporate
Goals Weight
 Individual
Goals Weight
Mark K. Mason (1)
 80% 20%
John M. Michel (2)
80%20%
Godfrey B. Evans (3)
50%50%
Darrell S. van Amen (4)
 50% 50%
(1)Mr. Mason’s corporate goal achievements are more heavily weighted because he is describedresponsible for Company-wide results as CEO.
(2)Mr. Michel's corporate goal achievements are more heavily weighted to be in greater detail below.alignment with Mr. Mason’s as his oversight directly affects company-wide results.
Each eligible participant(3)Mr. Evan’s incentive plan weighting of 50% corporate goals and 50% individual goals reflects his primary focus on legal and administrative activities and support of corporate activities.
(4)Mr. van Amen’s incentive plan weighting of 50% corporate goals and 50% individual goals reflects his primary focus on Treasury activities and support of corporate activities.
Corporate Performance Goals, Metrics and Results

In 2022, corporate performance measured against the Peer Group was the basis for awards. The target level was set at the 50th percentile, the threshold was set at the 25th percentile and the maximum was set at the 75th percentile. Any performance results below the threshold would result in no payout. Performance results between threshold and target and between target and maximum would be calculated on a straight-line interpolation basis.
Below are the performance measures used for 2022:

Core ROAA: Defined as net income, adjusted to exclude any non-core items such as restructuring charges, merger expenses, or income from sale of branches, as a percentage of average assets. In 2022, a gain on the sale of branches was excluded as a non-core item.
Core ROATE: Defined as net income, excluding any amortization of intangible assets and adjusted to exclude any non-core items such as restructuring charges, merger expenses, or income from sale of branches, as a percentage of total average tangible equity, which is average equity less average intangible assets. In 2022, a gain on the sale of branches was excluded as a non-core item. A core ROATE of 11% or higher is required to receive an award in excess of 100% of target opportunity.

Efficiency Ratio:    Defined as noninterest expenses, adjusted to exclude any nonrecurring or unusual items, as a percentage of the total of net interest income and noninterest income, adjusted to exclude any nonrecurring or unusual items. In 2022, a gain on the sale of branches was excluded as a nonrecurring item. A lower ratio is a more positive result.

47


Nonperforming Assets (“NPAs”) to Total Assets: Defined as nonperforming loans plus other real estate owned divided by total assets. This is considered a key measure of the quality of HomeStreet Bank’s loan portfolio. Credit risk management remains a major focus of HomeStreet Bank so that management takes a balanced approach to growth, with an appropriate risk/return profile. A lower ratio is a more positive result.

Core Deposit Growth: Core deposits for these purposes is defined as total deposits less certificates of deposit. Growing core deposits is an important strategy to improve our deposit mix and support asset growth. Increasing core deposits supports the reduction of our proportion of alternative funding and helps us to manage funding costs. Growth is calculated as the change from the average core deposits for the fourth quarter of the current year as compared average core deposits for the fourth quarter of the of the prior year. Any deposits added through mergers or acquisitions are excluded from the computation and any deposits sold are removed from this computation.
The following table provides the 25th (Threshold), 50th (Target) and 75th (Maximum) percentiles of the performance measures for the Peer Group, the Company’s results, the weighting of each performance measure and the computed award for 2022:

 
Peer Performance (1)
 
Company
Results
(2)
 Excess
(Shortfall)
To Target
 Weighting Computed
Award
Performance Measure 
25th
Percentile
Threshold
 
50th
Percentile
Target
 
75th
Percentile
Maximum
 
Core ROAA1.06%1.15%1.29%0.75%(0.40)%20%—%
Core ROATE12.74%14.95%16.00%10.9%(4.05)%30%—%
Efficiency Ratio59.21%55.18%51.24%72.38%(17.20)%20%—%
NPAs to Total assets0.25%0.16%0.08%0.13%0.03%10%12.2%
Core Deposit Growth(7.07)%(2.34)%1.31%(9.04)%(6.70)%20%—%
Total12.2%
(1)Peer Group results were derived from financial information publicly released by each of the peer companies, including any non-core adjustments, nonrecurring or unusual items used in the computations. Any adjustments, nonrecurring or unusual items were applied on a consistent basis across companies in the Peer Group and the Company.
(2)For core ROAA, core ROATE and efficiency ratio, see Appendix A for reconciliations of these non-GAAP results of operations to the nearest comparable GAAP measures.
The Compensation Committee has the discretion to reduce or increase the payouts to the extent it determines appropriate to reflect the business environment and market conditions that may affect HomeStreet’s financial and stock price performance. No such discretion was exercised by the Compensation Committee for payouts earned in 2022.
Individual performance goals.
Individual performance goals are established at the beginning of each plan year. An NEO’s individual goals may relate to responsibilities, projects and initiatives specific to the executive’s business or function that are not covered in the corporate performance measurements.
To assess individual performance against the goals, the Compensation Committee selected qualitative goals for the CEO tied to key strategic initiatives that are aligned with the Company’s 2022 – 2024 Strategic Plan as approved by the Board, as well as his responsibility in the areas of profitability, diversification, business growth and credit quality as such areas correlate to the 2022 – 2024 Strategic Plan. Similarly, the CEO recommended qualitative goals for the other non-commissioned NEOs based on the specific department and business goals that support the Company’s 2022 – 2024 Strategic Plan, which were adopted by the Compensation Committee.
48


Mr. Mason, Chairman, President, Chief Executive Officer
Strategic Qualitative ObjectiveKey Results
Effective Leadership & Corporate GovernanceTook significant steps to mitigate the dramatic impact of unexpected rapidly rising interest rates on our balance sheet and profitability by significantly reducing new loan production in the second half of the year, implementing a promotional CD program and promotional money market account, hedging the cost of funds, and reducing non-interest expenses and headcount in production units. Maintained strong communication with staff, the Board, borrowers and investors. Led important strategic transactions including completing the Company’s $100 million offering of subordinated notes thereby reducing the Company's cost of capital, sale of Eastern Washington branches, and the purchase of Southern California branches. Onboarded a new, diverse member to the Board in January 2022, and partnered with the new Lead Independent Director. Incorporated ESG into strategic planning and developed a company-wide ESG Policy. Continued strong involvement in community affairs.
Expense Reduction and Operational EfficiencyEntered the year with a strong foundation for efficient operations as a result of progress made in recent years, and reduced staffing levels in 2022 to improve operational efficiency. However, we were unable to maintain the efficiency ratios we experienced the prior year as a result of the significant reduction in revenues as a consequence of the unexpected historically significant increase in interest rates by the Federal Reserve.
Continuation of Core Business Focused on Profitable GrowthInterest rate driven challenges drove our inability to maintain or improve our overall profitability, particularly in our Commercial Real Estate and Single Family Lending businesses. Executive succession planning remained strong and effective when used to backfill a vacancy created by the planned retirement of our Chief Risk Officer, while our risk management infrastructure remained sound with no material losses, credit or otherwise.
Audits and ComplianceNo material findings from regulatory examinations or external or internal audits, and all specific internal goals related to audit and compliance were achieved in 2022.
Mr. Michel, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
Strategic Qualitative ObjectiveKey Results
Improve the efficiency and effectiveness of the finance, treasury and accounting FunctionsOversaw implementation of new general ledger system. Assisted in outsourcing of certain Treasury hedging activities. Reduced or maintained staffing levels in each of these departments and managed non-interest expense levels within budget.
Assist managing the Company’s capital management strategy.Prepared analysis of Company’s capital management strategy alternatives, coordinated approval and execution of share repurchase programs, assisted in issuance of $100 million subordinated debt offering, supported sale of branches, supported entering into agreement to purchase three southern California branches which closed in the first quarter of 2023.
Maintain effective controls over financial reporting and accounting functions.Did not receive any significant adverse findings or material adverse comments from financial, regulatory and internal audit examinations and audits.



49


Mr. Evans, General Counsel, Chief Administrative Officer & Corporate Legal Secretary
Strategic Qualitative ObjectiveKey Results
Expense ManagementExceeded departmental budget goals for Legal, HR, Risk and Compliance, and Community Relations.
Audit and Examination FindingsNo material findings from regulatory examinations or external or internal audits, and all specific internal goals related to audit and compliance were achieved in 2022.
Customer SatisfactionMore than 75% of customers surveyed assessed the Legal, HR, Risk and Compliance and Community Relations Department’s performance as “very satisfied” or better.
Manager Discretion - Management of Significant Legal MattersLegal work relating to $100 million subordinated debt offering, implementation of the company’s ESG program, legal support for branch acquisition and sale projects, holding company and bank boards and Compensation and Nominating and Governance Committees.
Mr. van Amen, Executive Vice President, Chief Investment Officer, Treasurer
Strategic Qualitative ObjectiveKey Results
Investment Portfolio StrategyPortfolio was competitive against benchmark in challenging environment.
Investment in Community DevelopmentReceived an Outstanding rating in compliance exam results.
Transition Hedging ProcessSuccessfully transitioned hedging process from LIBOR.
Audits and ComplianceNo material findings from regulatory examinations or external or internal audits, and all specific internal goals related to audit and compliance were achieved in 2022.

2022 Annual Incentive Plan is assigned targetResults
Based on the corporate results and maximumthe evaluation of individual performance achievements described above, the Compensation Committee approved the following Annual Incentive Plan incentive award payouts:

Non-Commissioned NEOCorporate
Component
(% of Target
Achieved)
Individual
Component
(% of Target
Achieved)
Overall Award
(As a % of a
Target
Opportunity)
Actual
Payout
($)
Mark K. Mason (1)
12.2 %80.0 %25.8 %204,490 
John M. Michel (2)
12.2 %100.0 %29.8 %81,120 
Godfrey B. Evans (3)
12.2 %100.0 %56.1 %84,370 
Darrell S. van Amen (4)
12.2 %100.0 %56.1 %93,870 
(1)Mr. Mason was awarded 80% of target for his individual performance. Stronger performance on many aspects of leadership, strategic transactions and governance were offset by the Company’s difficulty in achieving operational efficiency and profitable growth in the midst of the Federal’s Reserve’s interest rate tightening cycle.
(2)Mr. Michel was awarded 100% of target for his individual performance given his successful results of the general ledger conversion project and his work on capital management alternatives such as the disposition and acquisition of branches.
(3)Mr. Evans was awarded 100% of target for his individual performance given the support he provided to all segments of the Company including his involvement in the debt offering and the disposition and acquisition of branches.
(4)Mr. van Amen was awarded 100% of target for his individual performance for managing the Company’s asset and liability management strategies in a challenging economic environment and improving the Company’s hedging processes.
50



Commissioned NEO Incentive Plan Arrangements
Our commissioned NEO is eligible for annual incentive awards under a separate arrangement, which provides for payout opportunities expressedbased on business unit performance results to incentivize the NEO to generate profitable quality loans for HomeStreet Bank, which aligns with his roles and responsibilities. We believe a commissioned program is consistent with competitor practices for similar positions and generally provides for a larger portion of his compensation to be at-risk.
Mr. Endresen’s incentive plan is comprised of two parts: a production incentive, which is paid out monthly and a profitability incentive, 50% of which is paid out quarterly with the remaining 50% paid in the following year. The production incentive is based on loan commitments originated by the Company’s commercial real estate (“CRE”) business unit, with a higher rate paid for Fannie Mae loan commitments. The profitability incentive is based on the income before tax of the CRE business unit, which includes corporate funding and overhead allocations. We are not disclosing the payout formulas used due to confidentiality and competitive concerns. The profitability incentive payout is subject to a discount based on levels of classified loans in the CRE portfolio. This incentive discount is intended to encourage loan production consistent with the safety and soundness of HomeStreet Bank.
Performance Goals, Metrics and Results
The following table shows the performance measures, and 2022 results, for Mr. Endresen:

Performance MeasuresTargetResultsResults
(% of Target)
CRE Business Unit: Mr. Endresen
Profitability (1)
$90.3 million$66.8 million73.9 %
Loan Production (2)
$2.50 billion$1.98 billion79.0 %
(1)Profitability is a percentage of the pre-tax income (after determining allocation of consolidated Company overhead expenses) of the related business units.
(2)Loan production is total dollar amount of loan commitments in the current year for the related business unit. For commercial real estate loan production payouts vary by certain channels.
2022 Award Payouts
Based on the performance results described above, the following incentive awards were paid to Mr. Endresen:

Target
Payout
($)
Actual Payout
NEO($)% of
Target
William D. Endresen1,567,539 1,157,472 73.8 %

Long-Term Incentives
Our long-term incentive compensation consists of a combination of RSUs and PSUs that are granted under the 2014 Plan.
2022 Target Long-Term Incentive Award Grants.
In 2022, the Company granted long-term incentive awards consisting of 50% PSUs and 50% RSUs, as approved by the Compensation Committee. The value of the equity awards determined by the Compensation Committee was based on a target value as a percentage of base salary. The specific levelCompensation Committee determines the target by reviewing Peer Group data and range of opportunities varies by individual, and reflects each participant’s past and expected future contributionsappropriate market data relevant to the successbanking industry and sets targets at levels intended to create a meaningful opportunity for reward predicated on increasing shareholder value. In addition to considering competitive market data, the Compensation Committee also considers an individual’s performance history, experience, an individual’s potential for future advancement and promotions, the CEO’s recommendations
51


for awards other than his own, and the value of HomeStreet, as well as market-competitive opportunities for employees with similar skills, experienceexisting vested and responsibilities at companies comparable to HomeStreet.unvested outstanding equity awards. The 2014 target incentive opportunity was 75% of base salary for Mr. Mason, and 20% to 40% for other executive officer participants. The maximum incentive opportunity in 2014 was 150% of target. Therefore, the maximum incentive opportunity was 112.5% for Mr. Mason and 30% to 60% for other executive officer participants. Ms. Bartels was not hired until 2015 and therefore did not participate in the plan in 2014. The 2015 target incentive opportunity was 75% of base salary for Mr. Mason, 50% for Ms. Bartels, and 20% to 45% for other participants with a title of senior vice president or above. The maximum incentive opportunity in 2015 was 150% of target. Therefore, the maximum incentive opportunity as a percentage of base salary was 112.5% for Mr. Mason, 75% for Ms. Bartels, and 30% to 67.5% for other participants with a title of senior vice president or above.
Pre-defined corporate, department and/or individual performance goals are assignedrelative weight given to each participant and weighted according toof these factors varies among individuals at the importance of Company or Department’s strategies. Corporate performance goals are established each year by the HRCG Committee, with input from our Chief Executive Officer. Individual goals for Mr. Mason are established by the HRCG Committee, and department and individual goals for the other executive officer participants are established by Mr. Mason and approved by the HRCG Committee.
2015 Performance Goals and Actual Results for Mr. Mason: Mr. Mason serves as Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President of HomeStreet, Inc. and the Bank.


Mr. Mason’s 2015 incentive opportunity was weighted 80% to corporate goals and 20% to individual goals. The corporate performance goals (80% of total) established for Mr. Mason included threshold, target and stretch performance goals for mortgage return on equity (27.5% weight), commercial and consumer return on equity (27.5% weight), classified assets to total assets (10% weight), core deposit growth (15% weight) and non-single family loan origination (20% weight). The individual goals (20% of total) established for Mr. Mason were related to diversification of revenue, profitability of our mortgage banking segment, audit process improvements and completion of certain acquisition goals. Individual goals for Mr. Mason were not assigned specific weights in 2015.Compensation Committee’s discretion.
The following table summarizes Mr. Mason’s 2015 corporate performance goals, as established bybelow shows the HRCG Committee, and actual results for 2015:grant date fair value of long-term incentive awards granted in 2022 to each of the NEOs:


Corporate Performance AreaWeightCorporate Performance GoalsActual ResultPayout
Threshold
(50% of Target Payout)
TargetMaximum
(150% of Target Payout)
Mortgage Return on Equity (%)27.5%10.00%24.50%36.75%24.29%
$90,093
Commercial & Consumer Return on Equity (%)27.5%7.30%9.40%14.10%7.31%
$45,591
Classified Assets to Total Assets (%)10%2.00%1.00%0.80%0.55%
$49,500
Core Deposit Growth (%)15%5.00%10.00%15.00%4.50%
$0.00
Non-Single Family Loan Originations (Millions) ($)20%$972.0$1,373.0$1,650.0$1,540
$85,895
Corporate: (80% Total Weight)     
$271,079

Individual Performance AreaWeightIndividual Performance Goals  
Far Below TargetBelow TargetTargetExceeds TargetActual ResultsPayout
Individual: (20% Total Weight)
100%0.00%7.50%15.00%22.50%15.00%$82,500
RSUsPSUsTotal
NEOValue
($)
Shares
(#)
Value
($)
Target Shares
(#)
Value
($)
Target
Shares
(#)
Mark K. Mason$400,920 7,710 $394,058 7,710 $794,978 15,420 
John M. Michel137,644 2,647 135,288 2,647 272,932 5,294 
William D. Endresen100,880 1,940 99,153 1,940 200,033 3,880 
Godfrey B. Evans75,972 1,461 74,672 1,461 150,644 2,922 
Darrell S. van Amen84,500 1,625 83,054 1,625 167,554 3,250 
The HRCG Committee determined that Mr. Mason performed at target for his individual goals for 2015, which is 20%PSUs are earned and vested based on achieving a specified company performance result and continued employment over the three-year performance period. In each case, the vesting of his total incentive. Therefore, Mr. Mason received a payout of $82,500 for his individual goals. With respect to the corporate performance goals for Mr. Mason, mortgage return on equity and commercial and consumer return on equity were below target, but above threshold. Core deposit growth was below threshold. Classified assets to total assets and non-single family loan originations were above target. Mr. Mason received a payout of $271,079 for the corporate goals and therefore earned a total cash incentive under the Annual Incentive Plan equal to $353,579 or approximately 64.29% of salary.
In January 2016, the HRCG also approved a discretionary bonus for Mr. Mason for his substantial achievement of strategic initiatives in 2015 which will positively affect the Bank in 2016. These activities include acquisition integration work executed in early 2015 and growth in all business lines. Mr. Mason received a discretionary bonus of $150,000 for his performance in this regard.
2015 Performance Goals and Actual Results for Ms. Melba Bartels: Ms. Bartels serves as Senior Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer of HomeStreet Inc. and the Bank.
Ms. Bartels 2015 bonus under the Annual Incentive Planaward is also basedcontingent on her performance objectives. Her bonus potential for 2015 was 50% of base salary with a maximum payout potential of 75% of base salary.



Ms. Bartels’ individual performance goals included enhancing accounting processes, establishing a more robust Investor Relations function, supporting strategic plan development and merger and acquisition analysis and integration activity. Individual goals for Ms. Bartels were not assigned specific weights in 2015. The HRCG determined that Ms. Bartels performed above target for her individual goals, for which she received a bonus of $121,875. Ms. Bartels was also awarded a bonus of $66,747 based on corporate goals, for a total bonus earned in 2015 of $188,622, representing approximately 58.04% of her base salary.

Ms. Bartels also received a one-time signing bonus of $75,000 upon joining the Company in August 2015. If she were to voluntarily terminate herNEO’s employment with the Company or benot having been terminated for causeany reason other than retirement, death or disability prior to August 3, 2017, she would be required to repay a pro rata portion of that bonus based on the number of whole months that termination occurs prior to August 3, 2017 divided by 24.

2015 Performance Goals and Actual Results for Rose Marie David: Ms. David serves as Senior Executive Vice President, Mortgage Lending Director.

Ms. David’s incentive compensation plan consists of two components, volume and profitability, with each weighing 50%date the Compensation Committee certifies the achievement of the total incentive. The quarterly volume incentive is paid on achievement relative to five (5) tiers of achievement. The lowest tier paid out 1.750 basis points on purchase loans and 1.000 basis points on refinance loansperformance goal for the first $300 million of volume. The highest tier pays out on a declining basis at 1.000 basis point of purchase loans and .500 basis points on refinance loans for volume over $975,000,000. The quarterly profitability incentive paid 1.356% of HomeStreet mortgage banking segment pre-tax income (post allocations and excluding income and expense for Windermere Mortgage Services). Ms. David received a total of $1,233,505 under the cash incentive plan in 2015.relevant performance period.

Incentive Plan Risk Management
The HRCG Committee regularly reviews our incentive compensation arrangements for all executives and non-executive employees who, either individually orRSUs awarded annually as part of a group, have the ability to expose HomeStreet to material amounts of risk (“covered employees” under the interagency Guidance on Sound Incentive Compensation Policies). In addition to rigorous company-wide internal controls processes, the HRCG Committee takes the following measures to ensure thatour long-term incentive compensation arrangements for covered employees do not encourage participants to expose HomeStreet to unnecessary or excessive risks:
Annual HRCG Committee approval of incentive plan payouts;
HRCG Committee approval of any material changes to plan terms;
HRCG Committee oversight of annual incentive plan risk assessments;
Allowance for HRCG Committee discretion, if necessary, to address extraordinary events or circumstances;
Caps and/or deferral mechanisms to avoid “run-away” short-term incentive opportunities;
Balanced performance metrics, including safety and soundness goals;
Delivery of a meaningful portion of executive compensation in the form of equity instruments that vest over multiple years, encouraging a natural interest in the long-term financial health of HomeStreet;
Clear communication and transparency in the establishment, administration and monitoring of incentive arrangements


“Clawback” Provisions: Each of HomeStreet’s incentive compensation arrangements includes provision for the reduction or recovery of awards if the HRCG Committee determines that materially inaccurate financial information was used in determining award payouts or if it was determined that the recipient’s activities exposed HomeStreet to imprudent risks. Should it be necessary, the HRCG Committee will determine the amount of any award that was overpaid as a result of inaccurate information and will send the participant a recovery notice specifying the overpayment amount and the terms for repayment.
In addition, Section 304 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002 provides a basis to recover incentive awards in certain circumstances. If we are required to restate our financials due to noncompliance with any financial reporting requirements as a result of misconduct, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer must reimburse the Company for: (1) any bonus or other incentive or equity based compensation received during the 12 months following the first public issuance of the non-complying document, and (2) any profits the executive realized from sales of HomeStreet securities during that period.
Based on the findings from its ongoing monitoring and oversight efforts, the HRCG Committee has determined that none of our incentive compensation arrangements expose HomeStreet to unnecessary or excessive risks that could materially threaten the value of HomeStreet.
Equity Incentive Compensation
2014 Equity Incentive Plan. On May 29, 2014, the shareholders approved the 2014 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2014 Plan”), which authorizes the grant of nonqualified and incentive stock options, stock appreciation rights (“SARs”), restricted stock awards, restricted stock units, performance stock units, stock bonus awards and cash incentive bonus awards. At the time the 2014 Plan was initially approved, the plan had a pool of 900,000 shares of our common stock that could be issued under awards granted pursuant to the 2014 Plan. As of April 21, 2016, there were 220,056 shares remaining available for issuance under the 2014 Plan that were not subject to then-outstanding awards and an additional 307,522 shares subject to outstanding restricted stock awards and performance stock awards. The purpose of the 2014 Plan is to give us a competitive position in attracting, retaining and motivating officers, employees, directors and consultants and to provide a means whereby officers, employees, directors and consultants can acquire common stock or earn incentive compensation based on the value of our common stock, thereby strengthening their commitment to HomeStreet and promoting an identity of interest with our shareholders. We do not believe that any element of the 2014 Plan encourages excessive or unnecessary risks to HomeStreet’s assets or reputation. The 2014 Plan is administered by the HRCG Committee.
At present we issue restricted stock units and performance share units, although Ms. Bartels received a one-time grant of restricted stock awards in connection with her hiring in 2015. The restricted stock units have a time based vesting schedule where the units vest incrementally in three equal installments on the one, twofirst, second and three yearthird anniversaries from the grant date. TheIn each case, the vesting of the award is contingent on the NEO’s employment with the Company not having been terminated for any reason other than retirement, death or disability on the applicable vesting date.
A Closer Look at PSUs.
PSUs are designed to focus the NEOs on long-term value creation for shareholders. PSUs are earned and vest at the end of a three-year performance share units are vestedperiod based on achievingthe Company’s total shareholder return (“TSR”) relative to a specified company performance measure. In 2015,peer group.
TSR is calculated as the performance measure was Return on Average Equity (“ROAE”) as measured over the performance period of 12 fiscal quarters beginningchange in share price from January 1, 2015 and endingof the beginning of the three-year period to December 31 2017. Reaching an average ROAE performance threshold equal to or less than 7% will resultat the end of the three-year period assuming that all dividends are reinvested in 0 shares vestingon the date paid. The PSU peer group consists of all companies included in the KRX at the end of the Performance Period. Reaching an average ROAE performance target of 10%Period (excluding the Company itself, if it happens to be a component company on that date). For results in between the 25th and 50th or 50th and 75th, there will be a straight-line interpolation calculation. Any achievement below the 25th percentile will result in 100%0% vesting.
 Threshold Target Maximum
Relative TSR performance 
25th percentile
 
50th percentile
 
75th percentile
Payment as a % of target 50% 100% 150%
Vesting Provisions that Apply to All Equity Grants. In addition to the vesting provisions described above, in the event of a change in control if the surviving entity does not assume the outstanding awards or place the participants in a similar plan with no diminution in value of awards, all then outstanding equity awards, including PSUs and RSUs, will vest upon the change in control, with PSUs vesting at target number oflevel. Additionally, if a participant is terminated without cause or resigns for good reason within 12 months following such change in control, his or her outstanding equity awards will vest upon the termination date. For more information regarding such provisions and the retirement, death or disability provisions described above, please see “Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control”.
52


2020 – 2022 Performance Period Results and Payouts. For the 2020 – 2022 performance share units vesting. Reaching an average ROAEperiod, PSUs would have been earned based on the same design as the PSUs for the 2022 – 2024 Performance Period. The following chart shows the threshold, target and maximum metrics for the 2020 – 2022 PSUs and performance of greater than or equal to 12% will result in 150% offor this period.

 Threshold Target Maximum Results
TSR Percentile Rank 
25th percentile
 
50th percentile
 
75th percentile
 
6th percentile
Payout as a % of Target 50% 100% 150% 0%
No 2020 PSUs were earned based on the target number of performance share units vesting.results for the three-year period ended December 31, 2022:
Other Benefit Plans
NEOTarget
Share (#)
Award (#)
Mark K. Mason12,273 
John M. Michel5,421 
William D. Endresen4,383 
Godfrey B. Evans3,333 
Darrell S. van Amen3,708 
401(k) Savings Plan
OTHER PRACTICES, POLICIES AND GUIDELINES
Clawback Provisions
Our 40l(k) Savings Plan (the “401(k) Plan”) also includesshort-term cash incentive plans include a clawback provision in the event of a material restatement of financial results. If the Board reasonably determines that an account holding employer stock from our prior ESOP which merged into the 401(k) plan. Effective January 1, 2013, the employer matching structure and vesting qualified the 401(k) Plan as a “Safe Harbor Plan” under the Small Business Job Protection Act of 1996. The waiting period for receiving the Company match was changed from six monthsexecutive engaged in knowing or intentionally fraudulent or illegal conduct that materially contributed to the pay period following an employee’s hire date and eligible compensationneed for the Company match changed to includerestatement, the Board, based on available remedies, will seek recovery or forfeiture from that executive officer of all compensation (subject to IRS limits), withor a portion of his or her incentive compensation. The clawback amount would be determined by comparing the exception of employee referral bonuses and vacation payout, at separation. Effective November 1, 2014 compensation for purposes of plan contributions will only include post-severance compensation if such


compensation isactual incentive received by the employeeexecutive officer under the short-term incentive plan during the period prior to the restatement, with the amount that should have been earned had performance been measured on the basis of the restated results. The difference would be recovered from the executive.

On October 26, 2022, the SEC adopted long-awaited final rules implementing the incentive-based compensation recovery provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act. The final rules direct the stock exchanges to establish listing standards requiring listed companies to develop and implement a policy providing for the recovery of erroneously awarded incentive-based compensation received by current or former executive officers and to satisfy related disclosure obligations. We intend to adopt a clawback policy to reflect these new requirements.
Hedging Policy
Our Insider Trading Policy expressly bars hedging, derivative, or any other speculative transactions involving the Company’s stock by all directors, officers, employees and contractors of the Company, including its subsidiaries. Such prohibited transactions include hedging or derivative transactions, such as “cashless” collars, forward contracts, equity swaps or other similar or related transactions, or any short sale, “sale against the box,” or any equivalent transaction involving the Company’s stock. We also prohibit such persons from purchasing Company stock on margin (including in connection with exercising any Company stock options). In addition, we prohibit our executive officers, directors, and employees from purchasing or selling our securities while in possession of material, non-public information, or otherwise using such information for their personal benefit and we maintain a quarterly black-out window where applicable individuals may not trade. We may, in appropriate circumstances, permit transactions pursuant to a blind trust or a pre-arranged trading program that complies with Rule 10b5-1 to take place during periods in which the paycheck immediately following termination. individual entering into the transaction may have material nonpublic information or during black-out periods.
53


Health and Welfare Benefits
All NEOs are provided with the same medical, dental, vision and life insurance programs as all other benefits-eligible employees of the Company on the same terms and conditions as applicable to these employees generally.
401(k) Savings Plan
All employees, including our Named Executive Officers,NEOs, are eligible to make pre-tax contributions under the HomeStreet, Inc. 401(k) Plan contributions(the “401(k) Plan”) and may be eligible to receive a discretionary matching contribution. An employer matching contribution may begin immediately after enrollment in the 401(k) Plan for employees who are at least 18 years of age and meet applicable service requirements. Currently, the companyCompany matches 100% on the first 3% and 50% on the next 2% of deferrals (maximum(up to a maximum of 4%). This matching contribution is taxable when the employee withdraws the money whether they haveunless the employee elects matching funds to be contributed on a pre-tax or post-tax basis.
Executive Deferred Compensation
In 2004, we adopted a deferred compensation plan which allows designated executive officers to defer annually all or part of their incentive bonus and to receive an employer contribution equal to the additional employer contributions, if any, that would have been made to the 40l(k) Plan based on participants’ eligible compensation if certain IRS limitations on compensation and benefits did not apply. Interest earned on participant deferrals and employer contributions under the plan is equal to the average five-year daily treasury rate for the relevant quarter.
A participant or his or her beneficiary receives a distribution of his or her plan deferrals and Company contributions for a particular plan year upon the earliest of: (1) a future date specified by the participant, (2) the participant’s death, (3) the participant’s permanent disability, (4) the participant’s retirement on or after age 65 or (5) the participant’s termination of employment. The form of payment includes either a single lump- sum payment or annual installment payments over a period of years, but not more than ten years.
We suspended this plan in 2008 due to HomeStreet’s financial condition and as a result none of our Named Executive Officers were participants in this plan for the year ended December 31, 2015.
Health and Welfare Benefits
All Named Executive Officers are provided with the same medical, dental, vision and life insurance programs as all other benefits-eligible employees of HomeStreet on the same terms and conditions as applicable to these employees generally.
Perquisites and otherOther Personal Benefits
The Company does not have a formal perquisite policy or provide any supplemental executive retirement plans, although the Compensation Committee periodically reviews perquisites for our NEOs. We provide our Named Executive OfficersNEOs with benefits that we believe are reasonable and consistent with our overall compensation program and beneficial to the Company in attracting and retaining qualified executives. Perquisites includeAmong these benefits are health club membershipmemberships and parking.
Risk Assessment

It is our belief that a substantial portion of an executive’s total compensation should be variable “at risk” compensation, meaning it is tied to the Company’s financial performance. However, because performance and sales-based incentives play a large role in our compensation programs, we strive to ensure that incentives do not result in actions that may conflict with the long-term interests of the Company, our shareholders and our customers. Therefore, the Compensation Committee reviews an evaluation of all of our plans covered under the Sound IncentiveCompensation Policies Interagency Guidance, issued by federal banking regulatory agencies, as well as those that have sales components (applicable to executives and employees below the executive level) for attributes that could cause excessive risk-taking or unethical sales practices. The Compensation Committee concluded that our programs and practices do not encourage excessive risk-taking nor do they encourage unethical sales practices that could cause material harm to our Company or customers.
Tax Considerations
Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, places a limit of $1 million on the amount of compensation that we may deduct as a business expense in any year with respect to certain of our most highly paid executive officers. The Compensation Committee retains the discretion to award compensation that is not deductible as it believes that it is in the best interests of our stockholders to maintain flexibility in our approach to executive compensation in order to structure a program that we consider to be the most effective in attracting, motivating and retaining key executives.
Executive Employment Agreements and Severance and Change in Control Agreements

We use employment agreements to attract and retain certain executives and the talent, skills, experience and expertise that they provide to HomeStreet,the Company, with a goal of protecting and striking the right balance among such executives, the Company and the shareholders and providing necessary stability and skilled leadership for the Company. In 2011, we entered intoAll NEOs have an executive employment agreement, with the exception of Mr. Mason. Thisvan Amen. Mr. van Amen has a severance and change in control agreement, became effective upon lifting of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation’s cease and desist order for HomeStreet Bank on March 26, 2012 and was replaced with a new agreement in March 2015 with an effective date of March 26, 2015. We entered into an executive employment agreement with Ms. Bartels effective upon her hire date of August 3, 2015, and refer to the current agreements with Mr. Mason and Ms. Bartels as the “2015 Employment Agreements”.
The 2015 Employment Agreements continue for a term of three years from the effective date, with an automatic renewal for additional one-year periods thereafter unless either party gives notice of termination 180 days prior to the expiration of the then-current term for Mr. Mason and 60 days prior to the expiration of the then-current term for Ms. Bartels.
Mr. Mason’s 2015 Employment Agreementwhich provides for a base salary of not less than $500,000. Ms. Bartels’s 2015 Employment Agreement provides for a base salary of not less than $325,000. In addition, the 2015 Employment Agreements require the Company to establish performance-based target bonuses under the Company’s bonus incentive plan (discussed above under Short Term Incentive Compensation − Performance-Based Annual Incentive


Plan), pursuant to which Mr. Mason and Ms. Bartels may receive, subject to completion of objectives, no less than 50% of salary (or such higher amount as the HRCG may approve), less required withholding and authorized deductions. The Board of Directors or the HRCG Committee and Mr. Mason are required to establish mutually acceptable performance objectives and related payout ratios no later than March 30 of each fiscal year. In addition, Mr. Mason and Ms. Bartels may be awarded additional stock options, restricted stock units or performance share units under the 2014 Equity Incentive Plan or its successor.
In addition to the payment of earned and unpaid salary and incentive compensation, unused vacation time, and unreimbursed business expenses,certain severance benefits in the event of a qualifying termination of employment within one year or during the 90 days immediately preceding a “change of control” by the Company other than for “cause” or by the executive for “good reason,”that occurs in conjunctionconnection with a mutual release agreement, Mr. Mason will receive an amount equalchange in control. The Company does not maintain a standard severance plan subject to the sum of: (1) two-and-one-half times his then current base salary, (2) an amount equal to two-and-one-half timesEmployment Retirement Income Security Act of 1974.
54


Such employment and change in control agreements provide for severance benefits summarized in the table below. Incentive amounts for severance purposes are determined as the greater of his annualthe executive’s then-current target performance incentive payment earned by Mr. Masonor the performance incentive the executive received in the year prior to terminationyear.

NEOInvoluntary Termination
without Cause
or
Resignation for Good
Reason
Termination without cause or
for Good Reason in
Connection with a
Change in Control
Mark K. Mason2x salary | 2x incentive2.5x salary | 2.5x incentive
John M. Michel2x salary | 2x incentive2x salary | 2x incentive
William D. Endresen (1)
2x salary | 2x incentive2x salary | 2x incentive
Godfrey B. Evans2x salary | 2x incentive2x salary | 2x incentive
Darrell S. van Amen
(2)
2x salary | 2x incentive
(1)Mr. Endresen entered into a new Executive Employment Agreement with the contracted executive’s target incentive payment forCompany on February 25, 2021 amending and restating his prior agreement dated February 26, 2018. The February 25, 2021 agreement was further amended on February 28, 2023 extending the current year and (3) payment of health insurance premiums for Mr. Mason and his dependents for up to 18 months. In addition, allterm of Mr. Mason’s unvested restricted stock, restricted stock units and stock options will immediately vest and remain exercisable accordingEndresen’s Executive Employment Agreement to any stock option grant or plan. Performance share units will vest ifDecember 31, 2025.
(2)Mr. van Amen does not have an employment agreement. While the Committee certifiesCompany does not have a formal severance plan, his attainmentseparation payment benefits were assumed to be one week of the Performance Goal, which will be based on actual performance during the full quarters employed during the Performance Period. In the eventpay for every year of termination as described above precedingservice, with a “changemaximum payout of control” Ms. Bartels will receive an amount equal to the sum of: (1) two times her then current base salary and (2) an amount equal to two times the greater of her annual incentive payment earned in the year prior to termination or the contracted executive’s target incentive payment for the current year. In addition, all of Ms. Bartels’s unvested equity grants will immediately vest and remain exercisable consistent with any such grant or applicable plan. Performance share units will vest if the Committee certifies her attainment of the Performance Goal, which will be based on actual performance during the full quarters employed during the Performance Period.24 weeks.
In addition, Messrs. Mason, Michel, Evans and Endresen are each entitled to the paymentreceive 18 months of accruedcontinuing health insurance coverage for each such executive and unpaid salarywith respect to Messrs. Mason and incentive compensation, unused vacation time and unreimbursed business expenses,Evans, their dependents in the event of aan involuntary termination without cause or resignation for good reason, not involvingregardless of whether a change in control in exchange for executing a release,occurs.
All employment agreements of the departingCompany with its executive will receive: (1) two times his or her then current base salary, (2) an amount equal to two times the greater of his or her annual incentive payment earnedofficers provide that in the year priorevent any payment or benefits to termination or his target incentive payment for the current year and (3) payment of health insurance premiums for Mr. Mason’s dependents for up to 18 months. In addition, Mr. Mason’s and Ms. Bartels’s unvested equity grants will immediately vest and remain exercisable consistent with any such grant or applicable plan. Performance share units will vest if the Committee certifies the covered employee’s attainment of the Performance Goal, which will be based on actual performance during the full quarters employed during the Performance Period.
In Mr. Mason’s and Ms. Bartels’s 2015 Employment Agreements, termination for “Good Reason” is defined as (1) the assignmentprovided to the executive of any duties materially diminished from those in effect immediately prior tounder such assignment; (2) a change in the executive’s authority, duties or responsibilities which represents a material adverse change from those in effect immediately prior to such change; (3) material decrease in his annual Salary or deprivation of any benefit conferred on executives of similar or senior rank including, but not limited to, non-renewal of the relevant 2015 Employment Agreement without his or her prior written agreement; (4) relocation of the executive’s principal place of employment to a location that increases his or her commute from his or her primary residence by more than 30 miles one way; or (5) any other action or inaction that constitutes a material breach of the terms of such 2015 Employment Agreement by the Company.
To comply with Section 409A of the Code, the executive must give written notice of termination of employment within 60 days after the occurrence of the circumstances constituting Good Reason, and the Company will have 30 days to cure the circumstances constituting Good Reason, and the executive’s “separation from service” must occur no later than six months following the initial existence of the circumstances giving rise to Good Reason.
Payment shall be made in a lump sum on the earlier of the 90 days following the executive’s termination of employment or March 15 of the year following the year in which the termination occurred, provided that the


executive has executed and submitted a release of claims and the statutory period during which the executive is entitled to revoke the release of claims has expired before the payment date.
In addition to the prohibitions against solicitation of customers and employees and the diversion of corporate opportunities, Mr. Mason’s and Ms. Bartels’s 2015 Employment Agreements also contain a six-month non-competition agreement which restricts certain competitive acts on behalf of another bank or thrift located in Washington, Oregon, Idaho, California or Hawaii or any other state where the Company has an office or branch and employs fifteen or more people.
Mr. Mason’s and Ms. Bartels’s 2015 Employment Agreements further provide that if any payments received by the executive would constitute an “excess parachute payment”“parachute payments” within the meaning of Section 280G of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), the executive would be entitled to receive either (a) the full amount of such payment or benefit, taking into account the amount that would actually be received by the executive after application of all taxes and the excise tax imposed by Section 4999 of the Code, or (b) an amount reduced to the minimum extent necessary to avoid such payment or benefit being a “parachute payment”, depending on which alternative provided the executive the highest payment net of tax treatment. Executives would be responsible for any excise tax owing on any “parachute payments” paid under their employment agreements. None of HomeStreet’s employment agreements with any executive or any other employee contains any provision to provide for a gross up of excise tax payments under any circumstances, including a change in control.

Mr. Mason’s employment agreement, effective January 25, 2018, provides for an annual base salary of not less than $700,000 and will be eligibility for an annual performance-based incentive bonus with a target award equal to 75% of his annual salary, provided that the Board or the Compensation Committee may set a lower or higher bonus amount based on individual and Company performance and Peer Group data supplied by the Company's outside compensation consultant. Mr. Mason’s target award was increased to 100% effective January 2021, and his base salary was increased to $798,252, effective March 2022. In the event of a termination without cause or termination by him for good reason (as those terms are defined in the agreement), Mr. Mason will receive the termination benefits described in the table above. On December 13, 2022, the term of Mr. Mason’s employment agreement was extended to December 31, 2025, with an automatic renewal for successive one-year terms absent notice from either party not to renew within 180 days before the end of the term.

Mr. Michel’s initial employment agreement, effective May 11, 2020, provides for an annual base salary of not less than $435,000and eligibility for an annual performance-based incentive bonus with a target award equal to 60% of his annual salary, provided that the Board or the Compensation Committee may set a lower or higher bonus amount based on individual and Company performance and Peer Group data supplied by the Company’s outside compensation consultant. Mr. Michel's base salary was increased to $456,820, effective March 2022. In the event of
55


a termination without cause or termination by him for good reason (as those terms are defined in the agreement),Mr. Michel will receive the termination benefits described in the table above. Effective August 4, 2022, the term of Mr. Michel’s employment agreement was extended to August 4, 2025, with an automatic renewal for successive one-year terms absent notice from either party not to renew within 180 days before the end of the term.

Mr. Endresen’s employment agreement, effective February 26, 2018 provides for an annual base salary of not less than $315,000 and a loan production commissioned based incentive plan. Mr. Endresen’s base salary was increased to $401,700 effective March 2022. On February 25, 2021, the Company entered into an amended and restated Executive Employment Agreement with Mr. Endresen, which amended and restated his prior agreement dated February 26, 2018. The material terms of his Executive Employment Agreement remain the same as they were under his prior agreement. On February 28, 2023, the term of Mr. Endresen’s Employment Agreement was extended to December 31, 2025,with an automatic renewal for successive one-year terms absent notice from either party not to renew within 180 days before the end of the term.

Mr. Evans’s employment agreement, effective January 25, 2018, provides for an annual base salary of not less than $290,000 and eligibility for an annual performance-based incentive bonus with a target award equal to 45% of his annual salary provided that the Board or the Compensation Committee may set a lower or higher bonus amount based on individual and Company performance and Peer Group data supplied by the Company’s outside compensation consultant. Mr. Evans’s base salary was increased to $336,050 effective March 2022. In the event of a termination without cause or termination by him for good reason (as those terms are defined in the agreement), Mr. Evans will pay him individuallyreceive the termination benefits described in the table above. Effective December 13, 2022, the term of Mr. Evans’s employment agreement was extended to December 31, 2025, with an additional amount soautomatic renewal for successive one-year terms absent notice from either party not to renew within 180 days before the end of the term.
We believe that having in place reasonable and competitive post-employment compensation arrangements is essential to attracting and retaining highly qualified executive officers. Our post-employment compensation arrangements are designed to provide reasonable compensation to executive officers who leave the Company under certain circumstances to facilitate their transition to new employment. Further, we seek to mitigate any potential employer liability and avoid future disputes or litigation by requiring a departing executive officer to sign a separation and release agreement acceptable to us as a condition to receiving post-employment compensation payments or benefits.
In determining payment and benefit levels under the various circumstances covered by such post-employment compensation arrangements, the Compensation Committee has drawn a distinction between voluntary terminations of employment, terminations of employment for cause, and involuntary termination of employment in connection with or not involving a change in control of the Company. Payment in the latter circumstances has been deemed appropriate in light of the benefits to us described above, as well as the likelihood that the executive officer’s departure is due, at least in part, to circumstances not within his net payment willor her control.
In contrast, we believe that payments are generally not appropriate in the event of a voluntary resignation or termination of employment for cause because such events often reflect either an affirmative decision by the executive officer to end his or her relationship with us or inadequate performance.
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT
The information contained in this report shall not be diminisheddeemed to be “soliciting material” to be “filed” with the SEC, or to be subject to Regulation 14A or Regulation 14C (other than as provided in any respectItem 407 of Regulations S-K) or to the liabilities of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, and shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference in future filings with the SEC except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference into a document filed under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act.
The Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed the CD&A with management. Based on that review and those discussions, the Compensation Committee recommended to the Board that the CD&A be included in the proxy statement for the 2023 Annual Meeting of the Shareholders.
56


This report is submitted by the Company’s Compensation Committee consisting of Sandra A. Cavanaugh (Chairperson), Joanne R. Harrell, James R. Mitchell, Jr., and Nancy D. Pellegrino.

57


2022 SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE
The following table sets forth certain information regarding the compensation awarded to, earned by, or paid to our named executive officers during 2022, 2021 and 2020, to the extent required by SEC executive compensation disclosure rules.

Name and Principal Positions Year Salary ($) 
Stock Awards ($) (1)
 
Non-Equity
Plan
Compensation
Earnings
($)
(2)
 
All Other
Compensation ($)
(3)
 Total
($)
Mark K. Mason 2022 793,780  794,978  204,490  26,289 1,819,537 
Chief Executive Officer 2021 775,000  765,386  943,640  17,995  2,502,021 
  2020 738,462  506,139  800,730  74,849  2,120,180 
John M. Michel 2022 454,235  272,932  81,120  91,239  899,526 
Chief Financial Officer, EVP 2021 441,769  257,769  313,810  71,821  1,085,169 
2020376,058 762,697 335,650 65,743 1,540,148 
       
William D. Endresen 2022 399,450  200,033  1,157,472  25,279  1,782,234 
EVP, CRE Operations 2021 387,115  185,158  1,417,274  15,367  2,004,914 
  2020 375,577  180,755  998,874  56,047  1,611,253 
       
Godfrey B. Evans2022334,176 150,644 84,370 18,530 587,720 
EVP, General Counsel, Chief Administration Officer and Corporate Secretary
Darrell S. van Amen 2022 371,782  167,554  93,870  17,555  650,761 
EVP, Treasurer and Chief Investment Officer 2021 360,939  156,642  200,670  17,995  736,246 
 2020 364,359  152,918  203,940  84,844  806,061 
(1)Amounts represent the aggregate grant date fair market value computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. See grant date fair value table above for additional exciseinformation regarding the issuance of these awards.
(2)Represents amounts earned for services rendered during the fiscal year, whether or not actually paid during such fiscal year under the Annual Incentive Plans.
(3)Includes (i) 401k matching contributions; (ii) other tax duefringe benefits including health club memberships and parking; (iii) for Mr. Michel, housing and relocation benefits of $75,272, $56,454 and $42,720 in 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively; and (iv) in 2020, vacation payouts resulting from a change in our executive vacation policy of: Mr. Mason — $56,714, Mr. Michel — $7,730, Mr. Endresen — $43,270, and Mr. van Amen — $67,585.

58




2022 Grants of Plan Based Awards

Estimated Future Payouts Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards
(1)
Estimated Future Payouts Under Equity Incentive Plan Awards
NEOGrant DateThreshold ($)Target
($)
Maximum ($)
Threshold (#) (2)
Target (#) (2)
Maximum (#) (2)
All Other
Stock
Awards:
Number
of Shares
of Stock
or Stock
Units 
(#)
(3)
Grant Date Fair Value of Stock and Option Awards ($)
Mark K. Mason399,126 798,252 1,197,378 
1/1/2022— — — — — — 7,710 400,920 
1/1/2022— — — 3,855 7,710 11,565 — 394,058 
John M. Michel137,046 274,092 411,138 
1/1/2022— — — — — — 2,647 137,644 
1/1/2022— — — 1,324 2,647 3,971 — 135,288 
William D. Endresen— 1,567,539 — 
1/1/2022— — — — — — 1,940 100,880 
1/1/2022— — — 970 1,940 2,910 — 99,153 
Godfrey B. Evans75,612 151,223 226,835 
1/1/2022— — — — — — 1,461 75,972 
1/1/2022— — — 731 1,461 2,192 — 74,672 
Darrell S. van Amen84,123 168,246 252,369 
1/1/2022— — — — — — 1,625 84,500 
1/1/2022— — — 813 1,625 2,438 — 83,054 
(1)Amounts for Mr. Mason, Mr. Michel, Mr. Evans and Mr. van Amen are under the Annual Incentive Plan. Please see “Annual Incentive Plan Awards (Short-Term Incentives)” above in CD&A for more information. Amounts for Mr. Endresen are pursuant to his individual commission plans which do not have a threshold for payment or a cap on the maximum amount that can be paid under the award. The target amount represents the computed commission payout based on the 2022 strategic plan adopted by the Board. Please see “Commissioned NEO Incentive Plan Arrangements” above in CD&A for more information.
(2)Represents grants of PSUs under the 2014 Plan. Awards vest following determination by the Compensation Committee of satisfaction of performance goals over a three-year performance period ending on December 31, 2024. In each case, the vesting of the award is contingent on the NEO’s employment with the Company not having been terminated for any reason other than retirement, death or disability prior to the date the Compensation Committee certifies the achievement of performance goals for the relevant performance period. In addition, such awards may vest in connection with a change in control in certain circumstances. For more information, please see “Long-Term Incentives” on page 51 of this Proxy Statement, and “Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control” on page 62 of this Proxy Statement.
(3)Represents grants of RSUs under the 2014 Plan. Awards vest ratably on the first, second and third anniversaries of the date of grant. In each case, the vesting of the award is contingent on the NEO’s employment with the Company not having been terminated for any reason other than retirement, death or disability, on the applicable vesting date. In addition, such awards may vest in connection with a change in control in certain circumstances. For more information, please see “Long-Term Incentives” on page 51 of this Proxy Statement, and “Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control” on page 62 of this Proxy Statement.

59




Outstanding Equity Awards at 2022 Fiscal Year-End
STOCK AWARDS
NEOGrant
Date
Number of
Shares
or Units of
Stock That
Have Not
Vested (#)
(1)
Market Value of
Shares or Units of
Stock That Have
Not Vested ($)
(2)
Equity Incentive
Plan Awards:
Number of
Unearned Shares,
Units or Other
Rights That
Have Not
Vested
(#)
(3)
Equity Incentive Plan
Awards: Market
or Payout Value of
Unearned Shares,
Units or Other Rights
That Have Not
Vested ($)
(2)
Mark K. Mason3/28/204,091 112,830 — — 
1/1/217,730 213,193 — — 
1/1/21— — 17,393 479,699 
1/1/227,710 212,642 — — 
1/1/22— — 11,565 318,963 
John M. Michel5/26/201,807 49,837 — — 
1/1/212,604 71,818 — — 
1/1/21— — 5,858 161,564 
1/1/222,647 73,004 — — 
1/1/22— — 3,971 109,520 
William D. Endresen3/28/201,461 40,294 — — 
1/1/211,870 51,575 — — 
1/1/21— — 4,208 116,057 
1/1/221,940 53,505 — — 
1/1/22— — 2,910 80,258 
Godfrey B. Evans3/28/201,111 30,641 — — 
1/1/211,422 39,219 — — 
1/1/21— — 3,200 88,256 
1/1/221,461 40,294 — — 
1/1/22— — 2,192 60,455 
Darrell S. van Amen3/28/201,236 34,089 — — 
1/1/211,582 43,632 — — 
1/1/21— — 3,560 98,185 
1/1/221,625 44,818 — — 
1/1/22— — 2,438 67,240 
(1)Amount shown reflects the number of RSUs that had not vested as of December 31, 2022. In each case, the vesting of RSUs is contingent on the NEO’s employment with the Company not having been terminated for any reason other than retirement, death or disability on the applicable vesting date. In addition, such awards may vest in connection with a change in control in certain circumstances. For more information, please see “Long-Term Incentives” on page 51 of this Proxy Statement, and “Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control” on page 62 of this Proxy Statement.
(2)Based on the December 31, 2022 closing market price of the Company’s shares of common stock on Nasdaq of $27.58 per share.
(3)Includes PSU awards granted in 2021 and 2022. Vesting of PSUs is based on achievement of a performance goal that was based on TSR. For PSUs granted in 2021, the performance period covers fiscal years 2021 – 2023. For PSUs granted in 2022, the performance period covers fiscal years 2022 – 2024. Excludes PSUs issued in 2020 that were forfeited as the performance metrics were not met. In each case, the vesting of the award is also contingent on the NEO’s employment with the Company not having been terminated for any reason other than retirement, death or disability prior to the date the Compensation Committee certifies the achievement of performance goals for the relevant performance period. Pursuant to SEC rules, the amounts included in the table are based on the maximum award amounts given the Company’s current performance trends, which would result in an above target payout. In addition, such awards may vest in connection with a change in control in certain circumstances. For more information, please see “Long-Term Incentives” on page 51 of this Proxy Statement, and “Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control” on page 62 of this Proxy Statement.
60



The following table sets forth the number of shares acquired from the vesting of PSUs and RSUs by each of the NEOs during fiscal year 2022 and the value realized as calculated based on the closing price per share of our common stock on Nasdaq on the vesting date. There were no shares acquired on the exercise of stock options by any of the NEOs in 2022.

2022 Stock Vested
  Stock Awards
NEO Number of Shares Acquired on Vesting
(#)
 Value Realized on Vesting
($)
Mark K. Mason 25,258 1,246,468 
John M. Michel 10,848 353,296 
William D. Endresen 7,589 373,730 
Godfrey B. Evans6,299 310,044 
Darrell S. van Amen 7,153 352,039 


61


POTENTIAL PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATION OR CHANGE IN CONTROL
Employment Agreements
As described above in the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” as of December 31, 2022, we had entered into executive employment agreements, which provide for certain severance benefits in the event of a qualified termination with each of the NEOs other than Mr. van Amen, with whom we have entered into severance and change in control agreements.
Severance Provisions
Our NEO employment agreements provide for payment of severance amounts based on the executive’s annual salary and annual incentive plan award or, in the case of Mr. Endresen, commission-based incentive payments, of two times base salary and incentive payments. Each of Mr. Mason’s, Mr. Michel’s, Mr. Evan's and Mr. Endresen’s current employment agreement also provides for up to 18 months of continuing health insurance coverage for each such executive and with respect to Messrs. Mason and Evans, their dependents, in the event his employment is terminated by the Company or the surviving entity without cause (or by him with good reason).
Change in Control Severance Provision
Our NEO employment and change in control agreements also provide for certain severance benefits in the event (1) there is a change in control event (as defined in each executive’s agreement) and (2) the executive is either terminated by us or the successor company without cause (as defined in each executive’s agreement) or terminates his or her employment for good reason (as defined in each executive’s agreement) within 90 days prior to or 12 months following the change in control (as defined in each executive’s agreement). The agreements provide for payment of severance amounts based on the executive’s annual salary and Annual Incentive Plan award or, in the case of Mr. Endresen, commission-based incentive payments, of between two times and two-and-a-half times base salary and incentive payments. The current employment agreements for Messrs. Mason, Michel, Evans and Endresen also provide for up to 18 months of continuing health insurance coverage for each such executive and with respect to Messrs. Mason and Evans, their dependents in the event his employment is terminated by the Company or the surviving entity without cause (or by him with good reason) in connection with a change in control. Payments and benefits may be delayed six months following separation from service in connection with a change in control in order to comply with Section 409A of the Code.
Our NEO’s employment agreements contain a “better after-tax” provision, which provides that if any of the payments to the executive constitutes a parachute payment under Section 280G of the Internal RevenueCode, the payments will either be (i) reduced or (ii) provided in full to the executive, whichever results in the executive receiving the greater amount after taking into consideration the payment of all taxes, including the excise tax under Section 4999 of the Code.
Additional Severance Benefit
In addition, in the event of a termination due to total disability, Messrs. Mason, Michel, Endresen and Evans would receive 18 months of health insurance coverage for himself, and with respect to Messrs. Mason and Evans, their dependents.
Condition to Receiving Severance Benefits
As a condition to receiving any severance benefits under his or her employment agreement to which the executive would not otherwise be entitled, the executive must execute a release of all of his or her rights and claims relating to his or her employment and comply with certain post-termination restrictions, including, among other things, continuing to comply with the terms of his or her proprietary information and non-disclosure agreement, and for a period of six to 18 months, depending on the executive, and comply with certain non-solicitation and non-competition provisions that are set forth in each executive’s employment agreement.
62


Change in Control ArrangementsAgreements
Beginning in 2013, HomeStreet has entered into Change in Control Agreements with certain senior officers who do not have thisa change in control provision as part of an employment agreement.agreement, including Mr. van Amen. The Change in Control Agreement with Mr. van Amen provides an enhanced severance payment in certain circumstances: if within twelve (12)12 months following a change in control or 90 days prior to such change in control, the employee is terminated by the Company for any reason except for “Cause” (as defined in the agreement) or the employee resigns for “Good Reason” (as defined in the agreement), HomeStreet will pay a severance as follows:
Senior Executive Vice Presidents and Executive Vice Presidents who do not have other terms in their employment agreementsMr. van Amen will receive two (2) times theirhis current salary plus an amount equal to onetwo times theirhis last annual bonus or theirhis target incentive compensation for the current year, whichever is greater, provided a release agreement is signed at the time of termination.
Senior Vice Presidents2014 Plan
In addition to the severance benefits included in the employment agreements, our 2014 Plan provides that in the event of a change in control (as defined in the 2014 Plan) if the surviving entity does not assume the outstanding awards granted under the 2014 Plan or place the participants in a similar plan with no diminution in value of awards, all then outstanding equity awards will receive one times their current salary plus an amountvest upon the change in control. In addition, the 2014 Plan provides that if a participant is terminated without cause (as defined in the 2014 Plan) or resigns for good reason (as defined in the 2014 Plan) within 12 months following such change in control, his or her outstanding equity awards will vest upon the termination date.
2014 Plan Award Agreements
Our standard form of RSU agreement provides that RSUs vest incrementally in three equal installments on the first, second and third anniversaries from the grant date. In each case, the vesting of the award is contingent on the NEO’s employment with the Company not having been terminated for any reason other than retirement, death or disability on the applicable vesting date. If the participant’s continuous service terminates as a result of death, disability, or retirement on or after age 65, a pro rata portion of the RSUs will vest as of the date of such termination equal to onethe number of full months from the grant date until the date of such event divided by 36, times their last annual bonus or their target incentive compensationthe total number of RSUs granted, less the number of RSUs vested as of a previous anniversary date. The employment agreements for Messrs. Mason, Michel, Evans and Endresen provide for the current year, whicheverpro rata vesting of any unvested RSUs through the date of termination plus in the event of death or disability an additional one-year period of vesting for Messrs. Mason and Evan's and an additional six month period of vesting for Messrs. Michel and Endresen.
Our standard form of PSU agreement provides that PSUs are earned and vested based on achieving specified company performance over the three-year performance period. In each case, the vesting of the award is greater, providedalso contingent on the participant’s employment with the Company not having been terminated for any reason other than retirement, death or disability prior to the date the Compensation Committee certifies the achievement of the performance goal for the relevant performance period. If a release agreement is signedparticipant’s continuous service terminates during the performance period as a result of retirement on or after age 65, the PSUs will vest for that participant at the end of the performance period in a pro rata portion of the PSUs subject to achievement of the performance goal as if the participant’s continuous service had not terminated. The pro rata portion will be calculated by multiplying the PSUs thus vested by a fraction, the numerator of which equals the number of full months that the participant was employed during the performance period and the denominator of which equals 36. If a participant’s continuous service terminates during the performance period as a result of death or disability, a participant will vest on a pro-rata basis to the extent PSUs would be vested based on actual performance during the full quarters employed during the performance period. The pro-rata fraction will be calculated by multiplying then-vested PSUs by a fraction, the numerator of which equals the number of full months that the participant was employed during the performance period and the denominator of which equals 36. The employment agreements for Messrs. Mason, Michel, Evans and Endresen provide for the pro rata vesting of any unvested PSUs consistent with the PSU terms, through the date of termination, plus in the event of death or disability, an additional one-year period for Messrs. Mason and Evans and an additional six month period for Messrs. Michel and Endresen.
The tables below set forth the value of compensation and benefits that would become payable to each of the NEOs as of December 31, 2022 assuming (1) a change in control had occurred on that date and/or (2) the NEO experienced a qualifying termination of employment on that date, and in the case of payments made in connection with a change
63


in control without considering the impact of the “better after-tax” provision. The applicable amounts are reported based upon the NEO’s compensation as of such date and based on the December 31, 2022 closing market price of the Company’s shares of common stock on Nasdaq of $27.58 per share. In the case of termination benefits, these benefits are in addition to what the NEO would receive in the event of any termination, and the benefits available generally to salaried employees, such as earned but unpaid salary and reimbursement of reasonable business expenses incurred for activities prior to such date of termination.
The actual amounts that would be paid in connection with such events can be determined only at the time of termination.any such event. Due to the number of factors that affect the nature and amount of any benefits provided upon such an event, any actual amounts paid or distributed may be higher or lower than reported below. Factors that could affect these amounts include the timing during the year of any such event, the Company’s stock price and the executive’s then current base salary.
The benefits payable assuming (1) the applicable NEO is terminated without cause or resigns for good reason on December 31, 2022 and (2) no change in control has occurred, as reported in the below table, are as follows:

Cash severance: For NEOs with an employment agreement (Messrs. Mason, Michel, Evans and Endresen), cash severance amounts consist of (1) two-times annual base salary, plus (2) two times the greater of the executive’s annual cash target incentive or the last annual cash incentive paid to the executive, plus (3) health insurance benefits for the executive and their dependents for up to 18 months following termination. Mr. van Amen does not have an employment agreement. While the Company does not have a formal severance plan, his separation payment benefits were assumed to be one week of pay for every year of service with a maximum payout of 24 weeks.
The employment agreements for Messrs. Mason, Michel, Evans and Endresen provide for the pro rata vesting of any unvested RSUs and PSUs through the date of termination.

2022 Potential Payments upon Termination Outside of a Change in Control
  Cash Severance 
Intrinsic Value of Accelerated Awards if Awards are Assumed (1)
NEO Severance Payment ($)Highest Bonus Amount ($)Benefits Payments ($)Vesting of RSUs ($)Vesting of PSUs ($)Total ($)
Mark K. Mason1,596,504 1,596,504 33,883 538,665 870,921 4,636,477 
John M. Michel913,640 548,184 44,652 194,660 330,215 2,031,351 
William D. Endresen835,536 3,135,077 33,883 145,374 251,750 4,401,620 
Godfrey B. Evans699,884 314,948 37,399 110,155 191,047 1,353,433 
Darrell S. van Amen149,500 — — 122,538 — 272,038 
(1)Based on the December 31, 2022 closing market price of the Company’s shares of common stock on Nasdaq of $27.58 per share.
The benefits payable assuming (1) the applicable NEO is terminated without cause or resigns for good reason on December 31, 2022, (2) a change in control has occurred and (3) the NEO’s RSUs and PSUs are assumed, as reported in the below table, are as follows:

Cash severance: cash severance amounts consist of: (1) between two times and two-and-one-half times annual base salary, depending on the executive; plus (2) between two times and two-and-one-half times the greater of the executive’s annual cash target incentive or the last annual cash incentive paid to the executive, depending on the executive; plus (3) for Messrs. Mason and Evans, health insurance benefits for the executive and his dependents for up to 18 months following termination.
Equity awards: each outstanding equity award under the 2014 Plan that remains subject to vesting provisions will vest in full, with PSUs vesting at target levels.

64


2022 Potential Payments upon a Change in Control Where Awards Are Assumed
Cash SeveranceIntrinsic Value of
Accelerated Awards if
Awards are Assumed
NEOSeverance Payment ($)Highest
Bonus
Amount ($)
Benefits Payments ($)
Vesting of RSUs ($) (1)
Vesting of PSUs ($) (1)
Total ($)
Mark K. Mason1,995,630 1,995,630 33,883 538,665 870,921 5,434,729 
John M. Michel913,640 548,184 — 194,660 330,215 1,986,699 
William D. Endresen835,536 3,135,077 — 145,374 251,750 4,367,737 
Godfrey B. Evans672,100 302,445 37,399 110,155 191,047 1,313,146 
Darrell S. van Amen (2)
777,400 349,830 — 122,538 212,531 1,462,299 
(1)Based on the December 31, 2022 closing market price of the Company’s shares of common stock on Nasdaq of $27.58 per share. In the event awards granted under the 2014 Plan are assumed or replaced and the executive officer is terminated without cause or resigns for good reason within 12 months of the change in control, such RSUs and PSUs will become immediately vested at the time of the date of termination. PSUs will vest at 100% of target levels.
(2)While Mr. van Amen does not have an employment agreement, he would be paid a severance amount in this circumstance pursuant to his Change in Control Agreement with the Company.
The benefits payable with respect to equity awards assuming a change in control occurred on December 31, 2022 where the surviving entity does not assume the outstanding awards or place the participants in a similar plan with no diminution in value of awards, as reported in the below table, are as follows:

Equity awards each outstanding equity award under the 2014 Plan that remains subject to vesting provisions will vest in full, with PSUs vesting at target levels.

2022 Potential Payments upon a Change in Control Where Awards Are Not Assumed
 
Intrinsic Value of Accelerated Awards (1)
NEOVesting of RSUs ($)Vesting of PSUs ($)Total ($)
Mark K. Mason538,665 870,921 1,409,586 
John M. Michel194,660 330,215 524,875 
William D. Endresen145,374 251,750 397,124 
Godfrey B. Evans110,155 191,047 301,202 
Darrell S. van Amen122,538 212,531 335,069 
(1)Based on December 31, 2022 closing market price of the Company’s common stock on Nasdaq of $27.58 per share. Under the 2014 Plan, all RSUs and PSUs will become immediately vested at the time of a change in control if the acquiring company does not assume or replace such awards.
The benefits payable assuming the applicable NEO’s termination of employment on December 31, 2022 due to retirement, death or disability as reported in the below table are as follows:
Equity awards: The agreements covering the RSUs and PSUs provide for the pro rata vesting of any outstanding awards up to the date of a recipient’s retirement. The employment agreements for Messrs. Mason, Michel, Evans and Endresen also provide for the pro rata vesting of any unvested RSUs and PSUs, consistent with PSU terms, through the date of termination plus an additional one year period for Mr. Mason and Ms. Bartelsan additional six month period for Messrs. Michel, Evans and Endresen.
Bonus Payout: This amount represents the unpaid portion of any 2022 annual incentive payments which would be due to each of the NEOs upon their termination for retirement, death or disability as of December 31, 2022.
65


Benefit Payments: For Messrs. Mason and Evans, the Company will pay for health insurance benefits for the executive and his dependents for up to 18 months upon termination.

2022 Potential Payments upon Retirement, Death or Disability
  
Vesting of RSUs(1)
Vesting of PSUs(1)(2)
 
NEO Retirement ($) Death or Disability ($) Retirement ($) Death or Disability ($) Bonus Payout ($) Benefit Payments ($)
Mark K. Mason467,784 467,784 800,041 800,041 204,490 33,883 
John M. Michel140,217 140,217 257,211 257,211 81,120 — 
William D. Endresen105,742 105,742 199,210 199,210 467,358 — 
Godfrey B. Evans96,723 96,723 177,615 177,615 84,370 37,399 
Darrell S. van Amen(3)
62,331 62,331 167,714 167,714 93,870 — 
(1)Based on the December 31, 2022 closing market price of the Company’s common stock on Nasdaq of $27.58 per share.
(2)The actual results used to determine the payout of unvested PSUs are not covereddeterminable until the end of the relevant performance period. Therefore, PSUs reported in this table reflect the target level of performance goals for PSUs.
(3)While the RSU and PSU agreements provide for the pro rata vesting of awards upon retirement after age 65, Mr. van Amen would not be eligible as of December 31, 2022 because of his current age.

Ratio of CEO Pay to Median Employee Pay
2022 annual total compensation of the median employee of HomeStreet Bank (excluding the CEO) was $83,640
2022 annual total compensation of our CEO, Mr. Mason, was $1,819,537
For 2022, the ratio of the annual compensation of Mr. Mason to the median annual total compensation of all our employees was 21.8 to 1
How We Identified the Median Employee

To identify the median Company employee, we identified our total employee population as of December 31, 2022, and, in accordance with SEC rules, excluded the CEO. We then used a consistently applied compensation measure which included base pay, overtime, bonus payouts, incentives, commissions and the value of equity awards upon vesting. We did not annualize any compensation, apply any cost of living adjustments or exclude any employees.

As required by these Changethe SEC, after identifying our median employee, we calculated 2022 annual total compensation for our median employee using the same methodology that we used to determine Mr. Mason’s annual total compensation as reported in Control Agreements as their individual 2015 Employment Agreements have change-in-control provisions.the Summary Compensation Table of this Proxy Statement.
Human Resources
This pay ratio is a reasonable estimate calculated in a manner consistent with SEC rules based on our payroll and Corporate Governance Committees Reportemployment records and our methodology described above.
66



Pay Versus Performance

As required by Section 953(a) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, and Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K, we are providing the following information about the relationship between executive compensation actually paid and certain financial performance metrics of the Company. For further information concerning the Company’s variable pay-for-performance philosophy and how the Company aligns executive compensation with the Company’s performance, refer to “Compensation Discussion and Analysis.”

The HRCGfollowing table provides the required information for Mr. Mason, our Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, (“PEO”) and the average for all other NEOs (“Non-PEO NEOs”) as compared to selected financial metrics for the periods indicated:

Value of Initial Fixed $100 Investment Based On:
Year
Summary Compensation Table Total for PEO(1)
Compensation Actually Paid to PEO (2)
Average Summary Compensation Table Total for Non-PEO NEOs (3)
Average Compensation Actually Paid to Non-PEO NEOs (4)
Total Shareholder Return (5)
Peer Group Total Shareholder Return (6)
Net Income
(in thousands) (7)
Core
ROATE (8)
2022$1,819,537 $(678,861)$980,060 $168,560 $81.12 $106.01 $66,540 10.9 %
20212,502,021 4,174,334 1,188,347 1,677,709 152.94117.08115,422 16.8 %
20202,120,180 2,424,313 1,087,805 1,169,726 99.26 87.90 79,990 12.1 %
(1)    The dollar amounts reported in are the amounts of total compensation reported for our PEO for each corresponding year in the “Total” column of the Summary Compensation Table.
(2)     The dollar amounts represent the amount of “compensation actually paid” to our PEO, as computed in accordance with Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K which include the following adjustments:

YearReported Summary Compensation Table Total for PEO
Less:
Reported Value of Equity Awards (a)
Plus:
Equity Award Adjustments (b)
Compensation Actually Paid to PEO
2022$1,819,537 $794,978 $(1,703,420)$(678,861)
20212,502,021 765,386 2,437,699 4,174,334 
20202,120,180 506,139 810,272 2,424,313 
(a)    The grant date fair value of equity awards represents the total of the amounts reported in the “Stock Awards” column in the Summary Compensation Table for the applicable year.
(b)     The equity award adjustments, which are based on fair value of the related stock award (computed consistent with the methodology used for share-based payments under U.S. GAAP) as of the related vesting date or the year-end, for each applicable year include the addition (or subtraction, as applicable) of the following:

67


(i)(ii)(iii)(iv)(v)
YearYear End Fair Value of Outstanding and Unvested Equity Awards Granted in the YearYear over Year Change in Fair Value of Outstanding and Unvested Equity AwardsFair Value as of Vesting Date of Equity Awards Granted and Vested in the YearYear over Year Change in Fair Value of Equity Awards Granted in Prior Years that Vested in the YearSubtract the Fair Value at the End of the Prior Year of Equity Awards that Failed to Meet Vesting Conditions in the YearTotal Equity Award Adjustments
2022$248,494 $(933,931)$— $(66,948)$(951,035)$(1,703,420)
20211,331,918 1,009,191 — 96,590 — 2,437,699 
2020873,715 19,828 — (83,271)— 810,272 

(i)     The year-end fair value of equity awards granted in the applicable year that are outstanding and unvested as of the end of the applicable year.
(ii)     The change in the fair value of any awards outstanding and unvested as of the beginning and end of the applicable year based on the fair value at the end of the prior year and the end of the applicable year.
(iii)     The fair value, as of the vesting date, of any awards that were granted and vested in the same applicable year.
(iv)     The change in fair value of any awards granted in prior years that vested in the applicable year based on fair value at the end of the prior year and the fair value as of the vesting date; and
(v)     The fair value, equal to the fair value at the beginning of the applicable year, of any awards outstanding and unvested at the beginning of the applicable year that are determined to fail to meet the applicable vesting conditions during the applicable year.

(3)    The dollar amounts represent the average of the amounts reported for our Non-PEO NEOs as a group in the “Total” column of the Summary Compensation Table in each applicable year. The Non-PEO NEOs included for purposes of calculating the average amounts in each applicable year are as follows: (i) for 2022, John M. Michel, William D, Endresen, Darrell S. van Amen and Godfrey B. Evans; (ii) for 2021, John M. Michel, William D. Endresen, Darrell S. van Amen and Erik D. Hand; and (iii) for 2020, John Michel, William D. Endresen, Darrell S. van Amen, Erik D. Hand, and Mark R. Ruh.
(4)    The dollar amounts represent the average amount of “compensation actually paid” to the Non-PEO NEOs as a group, as computed in accordance with Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K which include the following adjustments:

YearAverage Reported Summary Compensation Table Total for Non-PEO NEOs
Less: Average Reported Value of Equity Awards (a)
Plus: Average Equity Award Adjustments (b)
Average Compensation Actually Paid to Non-PEO NEOs
2022$980,060 $197,791 $(613,709)$168,560 
20211,188,347 161,972 651,334 1,677,709 
20201,087,805 228,816 310,737 1,169,726 

(a)The grant date fair value of equity awards represents the average of the total amounts reported for our Non-PEO NEOs as a group in the “Stock Awards” column in the Summary Compensation Table for the applicable year.
(b) The average equity award adjustments for our Non-PEO NEOs, which are based on fair value of the related stock award (computed consistent with the methodology used for share-based payments under U.S. GAAP) as of the related vesting date or the year-end, for each applicable year include the addition (or subtraction, as applicable) of the following:
68


(i)(ii)(iii)(iv)(v)
YearYear End Fair Value of Outstanding and Unvested Equity AwardsYear over Year Change in Fair Value of Outstanding and Unvested Equity AwardsFair Value as of Vesting Date of Equity Awards Granted and Vested in the YearYear over Year Change in Fair Value of Equity Awards Granted in Prior Years that Vested in the YearSubtract the Fair Value at the End of the Prior Year of Equity Awards that Failed to Meet Vesting Conditions in the YearTotal Average Equity Award Adjustments
2022$61,825 $(241,287)$— $(107,917)$(326,330)$(613,709)
2021281,862 311,220 — 58,252 — 651,334 
2020313,191 3,891 51,548 (9,036)(48,857)310,737 

(i)    The average year-end fair value of equity awards granted in the applicable year that are outstanding and unvested as of the end of the applicable year.
(ii)    The average change in the fair value of any awards outstanding and unvested as of the beginning and end of the applicable year based on the fair value at the end of the prior year and the end of the applicable year.
(iii)    The average fair value, as of the vesting date, of any awards that were granted and vested in the same applicable year.
(iv)    The average change in fair value of any awards granted in prior years that vested in the applicable year based on fair value at the end of the prior year and the fair value as of the vesting date.
(v)    The average fair value, equal to the fair value at the beginning of the applicable year, of any awards outstanding and unvested at the beginning of the applicable year that are determined to fail to meet the applicable vesting conditions during the applicable year.

(5)    Cumulative TSR is calculated by dividing the sum of the cumulative amount of dividends for the measurement period, assuming dividend reinvestment, and the difference between the Company’s share price at the end and the beginning of the measurement period by the Company’s share price at the beginning of the measurement period. Assumes initial $100 investment on December 31, 2019.
(6)    Represents the weighted peer group TSR, weighted according to the respective companies’ stock market capitalization at the beginning of each period for which a return is indicated. The peer group used for this purpose is the KBW Regional Banking Index ("KRX"). Assumes initial $100 investment on December 31, 2019.
(7)    The dollar amounts reported represent the amount of net income reflected in the Company’s audited financial statements for the applicable year.
(8)    Core return on average tangible equity (“ROATE”) is defined as net income, excluding any amortization of intangible assets and adjusted to exclude any non-core items such as restructuring charges, merger expenses, or income from sale of branches, as a percentage of total average tangible equity, which is average equity less average intangible assets. See Appendix A for reconciliations of these non-GAAP results of operations to the nearest comparable GAAP measures. We have determined that Core ROATE is the financial performance measure that, in our assessment, represents the most important performance measure used by the Company to link compensation actually paid to our NEOs, for the most recently completed fiscal year, to Company performance.

Tabular list of Financial Performance Measures

As described in greater detail in “Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” the Company’s executive compensation program reflects a variable pay-for-performance philosophy. The metrics that the Company uses for both our long-term and short-term incentive awards are selected based on an objective of incentivizing our NEOs to increase the value of our enterprise for our shareholders. The most important financial performance measures used by the Company to link executive compensation actually paid to the Company’s NEOs, for the most recently completed fiscal year, to the Company’s performance are set forth in the table below:

69


Key HomeStreet Performance Measures
1. Core ROATE
2. Core ROAA
3. Efficiency ratio
4. Core Deposit Growth
5. Nonperforming Assets to Total Assets
6. Relative TSR (compared to KRX index)

The Company utilized Core ROATE as the top performance measure as it has a high correlation to stock price for banks.

Relationships Between Information Presented in the Pay versus Performance Table

While the Company utilizes various performance measures to align executive compensation with Company performance, all of those Company measures are not presented in the Pay versus Performance table. Moreover, the Company generally seeks to incentivize long-term performance, and therefore does not specifically align the Company’s performance measures with compensation that is actually paid (as computed in accordance with Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K) for a particular year. In accordance with Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K, we are providing the following charts to reflect the relationships between information presented in the Pay versus Performance table.

Compensation Actually Paid, Cumulative Company TSR and Cumulative Peer Group TSR

CAP vs TSR final.gif

70


Compensation Actually Paid and Net Income
Cap vs Net Income fINAL.gif


71


Compensation Actually Paid and Core ROATE

Cap vs Core ROATE final.gif

72


PROPOSAL 2
ADVISORY (NON-BINDING) VOTE ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Overview
As required pursuant to Section 14A of the Exchange Act, we are asking our shareholders to indicate their support for our named executive officer compensation as described in this Proxy Statement. This proposal, commonly known as a “say-on-pay” proposal, gives our shareholders the opportunity to express their views on the compensation of our named executive officers. This vote is not intended to address any specific item of compensation, but rather the overall compensation of our named executive officers and our compensation philosophy, policies and practices for named executive officers described in this Proxy Statement. In accordance with the requirements of the SEC, we are providing you the opportunity, as a shareholder, to endorse or not endorse our executive pay program through the following non-binding resolution:
“RESOLVED, that the compensation paid to the named executive officers, as described in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the compensation tables and related materials included in the Proxy Statement, is hereby approved.”
We believe that our compensation policies and procedures are strongly aligned with the long-term interests of our shareholders. Our compensation program is designed to motivate our leaders to contribute to the achievement of our financial goals and to focus on long-term value creation for our shareholders. For more information, we invite you to consider the details of our executive compensation provided under “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” on page 38 of this Proxy Statement. That section provides you with information about the structure of our executive compensation and the objectives that our compensation program is intended to achieve.
We currently conduct annual advisory votes on named executive officer compensation, and we expect to conduct the next advisory vote at our 2024 annual meeting of shareholders.
Because your vote is advisory, it will not be binding upon the Board. However, we value the opinions that our shareholders express in their votes and will take into account the outcome of the vote when considering future executive compensation arrangements.
Vote Required and Board Recommendation
The proposal on the advisory (non-binding) vote to approve named executive officer compensation requires the affirmative vote “FOR” of a majority of the shares present and voting on this matter.
THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS VOTING “FOR” APPROVAL OF THE
COMPENSATION PAID TO THE NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AS DESCRIBED IN THIS
PROXY STATEMENT.

AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT

As more fully described in the Audit Committee hasCharter, the Audit Committee, which consists solely of directors who satisfy applicable independence requirements of Nasdaq and SEC rules, is responsible for overseeing the integrity of the Company’s financial reporting process, financial statements and internal accounting controls.

The Audit Committee is also directly responsible for the appointment, compensation and oversight of the independent registered public accounting firm to perform quarterly reviews and an annual audit of the Company’s financial statements. Deloitte & Touche LLP (“Deloitte”) served as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for 2022 and conducted an audit of the Company’s consolidated financial statements for fiscal year 2022.

In fulfilling its responsibilities, the Audit Committee has:
Reviewed and discussed the adequacy and effectiveness of the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting with management and Deloitte;
73


Reviewed and discussed the Company’s critical accounting policies, practices, and estimates with management and Deloitte;
Reviewed and discussed the Company’s audited financial statements with management and Deloitte;
Discussed with Deloitte matters required by the applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board and the SEC;
Received and reviewed the informationwritten disclosures and the letter from the Deloitte required by applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board regarding the independent accountant's communications with the audit committee concerning independence, and has discussed with Deloitte the independent accountant's independence and;
Received and reviewed written communications from Deloitte regarding their internal quality control procedures including the results of internal and peer reviews and PCAOB inspections.

Based on its review and discussions, the Audit Committee recommended to the full Board that the audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2022 be included in the executive compensation section and has recommended toCompany’s 2022 Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC.
Submitted by the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors of HomeStreet, Inc.
Jeffrey D. Green, Chair
Scott M. Boggs
Sandra A. Cavanaugh
James R. Mitchell, Jr.

The information contained in this report shall not be deemed to be “soliciting material” to be “filed” with the SEC, or subject to Regulation 14A or Regulation 14C (other than as provided in Item 407 of Regulation S-K) or to the liabilities of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, and shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference in future filings with the SEC except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference into a document filed under the Exchange Act.

74



PROPOSAL 3
ADVISORY (NON-BINDING) RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
Overview
The Audit Committee has selected Crowe as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm to audit the consolidated financial statements of the Company and its subsidiaries for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2023.We have used Crowe as our independent registered public accounting firm since March 6, 2023 when it replaced Deloitte.
Shareholder ratification of the appointment of Crowe is not required by our Bylaws or other applicable legal requirements. However, the Board considers it desirable for shareholders to pass upon the selection of auditors as a matter of good corporate practice. We are submitting this proposal to our shareholders on an advisory (non-binding) basis, and the outcome of the vote will not be includedbinding on the Company. In the event that this appointment of Crowe as our independent registered public accounting firm is not ratified by our shareholders at the Annual Meeting, the appointment of Crowe as our independent registered public accounting firm will be reconsidered by the Audit Committee. Even if the selection is ratified, the Audit Committee in its discretion may direct the appointment of a different accounting firm at any time during the year if the Audit Committee determines that such a change would be in the Proxy Statement.best interests of the Company and its shareholders.
This
Change of the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

On September 28, 2022, following a competitive request for proposal process at the direction of the Audit Committee, we dismissed Deloitte as our independent registered public accounting firm, effective as of the date of Deloitte’s completion of its audit services for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2022, and the issuance of their report is submittedthereon. The decision to change independent registered public accounting firms was approved by the Audit Committee.

Deloitte’s reports on the Company’s Human Resourceconsolidated financial statements as of and Corporate Governancefor the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021 did not contain any adverse opinion or a disclaimer of opinion and were not qualified or modified as to uncertainty, audit scope or accounting principles.

During the two fiscal years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021, and the subsequent interim period through March 15, 2023, there were no (i) disagreements, within the meaning of Item 304(a)(1)(iv) of Regulation S-K with Deloitte on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure, or auditing scope or procedure, which disagreements, if not resolved to the satisfaction of Deloitte, would have caused Deloitte to make reference to the subject matter of the disagreements in connection with its reports.

We provided Deloitte with a copy of the foregoing disclosures and requested Deloitte to furnish us with a letter addressed to the SEC stating whether it agrees with the statements made by us set forth above and, if not, stating the respects in which is does not agree. Deloitte’s letter, dated October 3, 2022, was filed as Exhibit 16.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on October 3, 2022.

On September 28, 2022, we informed Deloitte that the Audit Committee consistinghad approved the selection of Doug Smith (Chair)Crowe as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2023. During our two most recent fiscal years ended December 31, 2022 and Judd Kirk, Scott Boggs, Tim Chrisman2021, and Tom King.

the subsequent interim period through March 15, 2022, neither we nor anyone acting on our behalf consulted with Deloitte regarding any of the matters described in Items 304(a)(2)(i) and (ii) of Regulation S-K.


Summary Compensation TableRepresentatives from Crowe are expected to be present at the Annual Meeting and will be given the opportunity to make a statement at the Annual Meeting if they desire to do so and respond to appropriate questions. Representatives from Deloitte are not expected to be present at the Annual Meeting.
75


Fees of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The following table sets forth information regardingpresents fees billed for professional audit services and other services rendered to the compensation awardedCompany by Deloitte for the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021. Amounts in this table are presented in thousands.

(in 000’s) 2022 2021
Audit Fees (1)
$1,720 $1,422 
Audit-Related Fees (2)
224 129 
Tax Fees (3)
91 81 
Other Fees (4)
Total$2,037 $1,634 
(1)Audit Fees consist of fees billed for professional services rendered for the audit of our consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K and for the review of our quarterly financial statements, as well as services that generally only our independent registered public accounting firm can reasonably provide, including statutory audits and services rendered in connection with SEC filings.
(2)Audit-Related Fees consist of fees billed for professional services in connection with the Company’s debt offering, which was completed in January 2022.
(3)Tax Fees consist of fees billed for professional services rendered for tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning.
(4)Other Fees consist of fees billed for products and services provided by the principal accountant other than the Audit Fees, Audit-Related Fees and Tax Fees.
Pre-Approval of Audit and Non-Audit Services
It is the responsibility of HomeStreet’s Audit Committee to earnedpre-approve all audit and non-audit services provided by our independent registered public accounting firm. The Audit Committee has adopted a policy authorizing certain permissible audit and non-audit services to be performed by our independent registered public accounting firm with subsequent reporting and oversight required by the Audit Committee. Permissible services, not pre-approved pursuant to this policy, require specific review and approval prior to the engagement by the Audit Committee, or a designated member. All services rendered by and fees paid to our Named Executive Officers.independent registered public accounting firm are reported to and monitored quarterly by the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee considers whether the provision of related audit services is compatible with maintaining the independent registered public accounting firm’s independence. To assist the Audit Committee in its oversight responsibilities, the pre-approval policy identifies the three basic principles of independence with respect to services provided by the independent registered public accounting firm: (1) whether the services are consistent with applicable rules on independent registered public accounting firm independence; (2) whether the independent registered public accounting firm is best positioned to provide the services in an effective and efficient manner, taking into consideration its familiarity with the Company’s business, people, culture, accounting systems, risk profile and other factors; and (3) whether the service might enhance the Company’s ability to manage or control risk or improve audit quality. The pre-approval policy also identifies the non-audit services the independent registered public accounting firm is prohibited from providing. All services provided by Deloitte in each of the last two fiscal years were pre-approved by the Audit Committee.

Engagement of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
In determining whether to engage or re-engage an audit firm, the Audit Committee annually considers, among other factors, the firm’s qualifications, performance and independence, including that of the lead partner, to determine whether the firm will serve in the best interest of the Company and its shareholders.
Based on the foregoing, the Audit Committee has retained Crowe as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 2023.
Vote Required and Board Recommendation
The proposal on the advisory (non-binding) vote to ratify the appointment of our independent registered public accounting firm requires the affirmative vote “FOR” of a majority of the shares present and voting on this matter.
76


Name and Principal PositionsYear
Salary
(1)($)
Bonus
(2)($)
Stock Awards
(3)($)
Option Awards ($)Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation (4)($)
Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings($)
All Other Compensation (5)($)
Total
($)
Mark K. Mason
Chief Executive Officer
2014500,000
 ---300,073---169,758 ---17,606 987,437 
2015537,500
 500,000459,330---353,579 ---19,381 1,869,790 
Rose Marie David
Senior Executive Vice President, Mortgage Lending
Director
2014200,000
 ---40,046---723,533 ---15,338 978,917 
2015200,000
 ---50,133---1,233,505 ---14,070 1,497,708 
Melba Bartels
Senior Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer (6)
2014---
 ------------ ------ --- 
2015135,417
 75,000269,204---188,622 ---72,249 740,492 

(1)The figures shown for salary represent amounts earned for the fiscal year, whether or not actually paid during such year.
(2)Mr. Mason received a bonus for his efforts with the Simplicity transaction in the amount of $350,000. Mr. Mason also received a discretionary award determined by the HRCG Committee in the amount of $150,000 for 2015 performance. Ms. Bartels received a sign-on bonus totaling $75,000.
(3)Amounts represent the aggregate grant date fair market value computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. For details of all assumptions made in such calculations, see Note 16 to our financial statements filed with our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015. The stock awards for each of 2014 and 2015 comprised 50% Restricted Stock Units (RSU’s) and 50% Performance Share Units (PSU’s) for Mr. Mason and Ms. David.  The grant date for the 2014 RSUs and PSUs was May 29, 2014 and the grant date for the 2015 RSUs and PSUs was January 29, 2015. The PSU awards listed above are based on reaching target performance. The value of the PSU awards at grant date if the Company reached maximum performance for 2014 and 2015, respectively, would be $225,055 and $344,498 for Mr. Mason and $30,043 and $37,600 for Ms. David. Ms. Bartels stock award amount represents a Restricted Stock Award (RSA) granted on August 3, 2015 in connection with her hire by the Company.
(4)Represents amounts earned for services rendered during the fiscal year, whether or not actually paid during such fiscal year under the Annual Incentive Plan.
(5)The Named Executive Officers participate in certain group health, disability insurance and medical reimbursement plans, not disclosed in the Summary Compensation Table, that are generally available to salaried employees and do not discriminate in scope, terms and operation. The figure shown for each Named Executive Officer for 2015 includes: (i) 401(k) matching contributions as follows: Mr. Mason, $13,400, Ms. David, $10,377, and Ms. Bartels, $3,254; (ii) health club membership for Mr. Mason of $2,148; (iii) parking as follows: Mr. Mason, $3,555, Ms. David $3,555, and Ms. Bartels $1,778; and (iv) life insurance premiums as follows: Mr. Mason, $258, Ms. David, $138, and Ms. Bartels, $46. Ms. Bartels also received a one-time benefit of $67,172 for relocation expenses. We provide certain non-cash perquisites and personal benefits to each named executive officer that do not exceed $10,000 in the aggregate for any individual, and are not included in the reported figures.
(6)Ms. Bartels was not an executive officer of HomeStreet at any point in 2014.





THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS VOTING “FOR” THE RATIFICATION OF THE
APPOINTMENT OF CROWE LLP AS THE COMPANY’S INDEPENDENT REGISTERED
PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING DECEMBER 31, 2023
77
OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT FISCAL YEAR-END 
 OPTION AWARDS STOCK AWARDS 
Name
Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised
Options (#)
Exercisable
Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised
Options (#)
Unexercisable
 Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Unearned Options
Option
Exercise
Price ($)
Option
Expiration
Date
 Number of Shares or Units of Stock that Have Not Vested 
Market Value Shares or Units
of Stock that
Have Not
Vested
 Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested (#)
Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested
($)(#)(1)
Mark K. Mason242,168    11.00 2/10/2022     30,826 669,232 
Rose Marie David        

     —
  7,282 158,092 
Melba Bartels        
  12,400 269,204 



(1)
Based on the December 31, 2015 closing market price of the Company’s shares of common stock on Nasdaq of $21.71per share.




CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
In addition to the compensation arrangements with directors and executive officers described in “Executive Compensation”“Compensation Discussion and Analysis” above, the following is a description of each transaction since January 1, 2015,2022, and each proposed transaction in which:
we have been or are to be a participant;
the amount involved exceeds or will exceed $120,000; and
any of our directors, executive officers or beneficialbeneficial holders of more than 5% of our capital stock, or any immediate family member of or person sharing the household with any of these individuals (other than tenantsa tenant or employees)employee), had or will have a direct or indirect material interest.
Loan TransactionsOther than as described below, there have not been, nor are there any currently proposed, transactions or series of similar transactions meeting these criteria to which we have been or will be a party other than compensation arrangements, which are described where required under “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” on page 38 of this Proxy Statement and “Corporate Governance — Director Compensation” on page 32 of this Proxy Statement.
Loans
From time to time, theHomeStreet Bank makes loans to directors, executive officers, principal shareholders, and their related interests (collectively, “insiders”) in the ordinary course of business. These loans, other affiliatesthan loans to immediate family members not living in compliance withthe director, officer or principal shareholder’s home, are subject to the Federal Reserve Board’s Regulation O, issued by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. These loans arewhich requires that they be made in the ordinary course of business, on substantially the same terms, including interest ratesrate and collateral, as those prevailing at the time for comparablenon-insiders. Regulation O generally defines a principal shareholder as a person that directly or indirectly or acting through or in concert with one or more other persons, owns, controls or has the power to vote more than 10% of any class of voting shares. While loans to immediate family members not living in the director, officer, or principal shareholder’s home are not subject to Regulation O, HomeStreet Bank’s Corporate Compliance department reviews these loans to ensure they meet the same qualifications listed above. All such loans originated in 2022 comply with persons not related to us,these provisions and do not involve more than the normal risk of collectability or present other features unfavorable to us.
IndemnificationHome Loans to Employees, Officers, and Directors Program
As a benefit of employment, HomeStreet Bank offers reduced closing costs to certain employees under the Home Loans to Employees, Officers, & Directors program. This program is offered to all permanent HomeStreet employees working 20 hours or more (“eligible employees”) for the financing of the employee’s primary or secondary residence. Employees may receive the closing cost credit on eligible home loan transactions once every 12 months. The amount of credit received depends upon the size and type of loan. Employee loan applications must meet HomeStreet Bank’s normal underwriting standards, and with the exception of discounted fees where applicable, the loan terms are the same as loans to members of the public. The same documentation requirements, including appraisal, credit report, and other third-party documentation, apply. The Home Loans to Employees, Officers, & Directors program is permissible under Regulation O, due to the fact that it is widely available to employees and does not give preference to the insider over other applicants.
Under HomeStreet Bank’s Related Person Transaction Policies and Procedures, if a loan to an insider or a related person has any terms or conditions not available to the general public, such as an employee discount, approval by the Audit Committee is required. If the loan amount is less than $1 million, the Chair of the Audit Committee has the authority to pre-approve the transaction.

No loans originated under the Home Loans to Employees, Officers, & Directors program during the year ended December 31, 2022.
Indemnification Agreements
We have entered into indemnificationindemnification agreements with eachall of theour current and former directors and certain of our current and former executive officers, of HomeStreet, Inc.including Messrs. Mason, Michel, Evans, Endresen and van Amen. Subject to
78


certain limitations, these agreements require us to indemnify these individuals to the fullest extent permitted under applicable law against liabilities that may arise by reason of their service to us, and to advance expenses incurred as a result of any proceedings against them as to which they could be indemnified. We also intend to enter into indemnification agreements with our future directors and executive officers.indemnified.
Consulting Agreement with Chrisman & Company, Inc.
In 2015, HomeStreet entered into an agreement with Chrisman & Company, Inc. (“Chrisman & Company”) pursuant to which that entity was engaged to assist in the recruitment of our new chief financial officer. Timothy Chrisman, who is a director of the Company and a member of the Company’s HRCG Committee, is the controlling owner, president and chief executive officer of Chrisman & Company. It was the intention of both HomeStreet and Chrisman & Company that compensation under this contract be limited to $120,000 plus reimbursement of out-of-pocket expenses incurred by Chrisman & Company on behalf of HomeStreet in connection with the search. However, as a result of an oversight by both parties, in addition to the provision requiring reimbursement of direct costs, the form of agreement used for this transaction initially included a provision calling for reimbursement of certain indirect expenses of Chrisman & Company in an amount equal to 10% of the total fees for services. As a result, we paid Chrisman & Company a total of $132,000 plus the reimbursement of direct costs in 2015. In early 2016, when the error was discovered, the agreement was reformed to match the terms originally agreed between the parties and Chrisman & Company reimbursed HomeStreet for the $12,000 paid in excess of the intended agreement. HomeStreet entered into a second agreement with Mr. Chrisman in April 2016 to assist in the recruitment of certain open positions at the Bank, with a maximum of $120,000 payable to Mr. Chrisman in 2016 under that agreement. The Board has considered the reformed agreement and the net payments made to Chrisman & Company under the reformed agreement as well as the 2016 agreement and determined that Mr. Chrisman remains an independent director of HomeStreet despite the initial overpayment of fees under the 2015 consulting agreement.

Procedures for Approval of Related Party Transactions
TheAs described above, HomeStreet Bank is subject to the requirements of Regulation O, which places certain restrictions on loan transactions between theHomeStreet Bank and its directors, executive officers and principal shareholders (or any of their related interests). Regulation O generally defines a principal shareholder as a person that directly or indirectly, or acting through or in


concert with one or more other persons, owns, controls or has the power to vote more than 10% of any class of voting shares. TheHomeStreet Bank surveys Company and Bank directors and senior and executive officers each year to identify their related interests. The board of directorsBoard has adopted a policy for lending to our employees, directors and executive officers to ensure compliance with Regulation O loansO. Loans by theHomeStreet Bank to our employees, directors, and executive officers, principal shareholders and their related interests that exceed $500,000 in aggregate require the approval of theHomeStreet Bank’s board of directors.
Prior to the completion of our initial public offering, in addition to the application of Regulation O to certain related-party transactions, we followed formal conflict of interest policies requiring the review and pre-approval of transactions with a related party by the chief executive officer and audit committee where the related party is a director or by the chairman, chief executive officer or general counsel for non-director employees. Following the completion of our initial public offering in February 2012, inIn accordance with the audit committee’sAudit Committee’s charter, the audit committee reviewsAudit Committee has reviewed and pre-approvespre-approved in writing any proposed related party transactions; however,transactions. However, certain types of transactions, including Regulation O Loans,certain loans made in the ordinary course of business, executive officer employment arrangements and director compensation required to be disclosed in our Proxy Statements,proxy statements, certain charitable contributions, transactions where all shareholders receive a proportional benefit and transactiontransactions entered into through a competitive bid prices, may be automatically deemed pre-approved as related party transactions under our Related Person Transaction Policies and Procedures, a copy of which is available on our website at www.homestreet.com.www.homestreet.com. In the case of a loan requiring HomeStreet Bank board approval under Regulation O, however, review and approval by our Board of Directors is still required to approve such loan under Regulation O despite any such pre-approval as a related party transaction.


79



PRINCIPAL SHAREHOLDERS
The following table sets forth the beneficialbeneficial ownership of our common stock as of April 21, 2016,March 31, 2023, by:
each of theour directors and Named Executive Officers of HomeStreet, Inc.;named executive officers;
all of our directors and executive officers as a group; and
each person known to us to be the beneficialbeneficial owner of more than 5% of any class of our securities.
The amounts and percentage of our common stock beneficially owned are reported on the basis of regulations of the SEC governing the determination of beneficial ownership of securities. The SEC has defined “beneficial” ownership of a security to mean, generally, the possession, including shared possession, directly or indirectly, of voting power or investment power. A shareholder is also deemed to be, as of any date, the beneficial owner of all securities that such shareholder has the right to acquire within 60 days after that date through (1) the exercise of any option, warrant or right, (2) the conversion of a security, (3) the power to revoke a trust, discretionary account or similar arrangement or (4) the automatic termination of a trust, discretionary account or similar arrangement. Under these rules, more than one person may be deemed a beneficial owner of the same securities, and a person may be deemed a beneficial owner of securities as to which he or she has no economic interest. Unless otherwise indicated, we believe that each of the shareholders listed has sole voting and investment power with respect to their beneficially owned shares of our common stock.
The percentages reflect beneficial ownership as of April 21, 2016,March 31, 2023, as determined under Rule 13d-3 under the Exchange Act and are based on 24,556,153.618,767,811 shares of our common stock outstanding as of that date. In addition, any options exercisableRSUs vesting within 60 days of April 21, 2016 will beMarch 31, 2023 are included in the beneficial ownership of the holder of such option,RSUs, and the percentage ownership for that holder will beis calculated by adding the aggregate number of options exercisableRSUs vesting within 60 days of April 21, 2016March 31, 2023 to both the number of shares held by that specific shareholder and the total number of shares outstanding. Unless otherwise set forth in the following table, the address of the listed shareholders is c/o HomeStreet, Inc., 601 Union Street, Suite 2000, Seattle, Washington 98101.



Unless otherwise indicated, all ownership interests or voting power referenced herein, either in percentage terms or number of shares, in respect of the Company’s outstanding shares, have been calculated in accordance with Rule 13d-3 under the Exchange Act.
80


Name of Beneficial Owner Number of Shares of Common Stock Ownership Percentage
Black Rock, Inc. (1)
55 East 52nd Street
New York, NY 10022
 1,729,473
  7.05%
Wellington Management Group LLP (2)
c/o Wellington Management Company LLP
280 Congress Street
Boston, MA 02210
 1,631,716
  6.65%
Bruce W. Williams (3) 797,836.44
  3.25%
Mark K. Mason (4) 487,713.00
  1.97%
Douglas I. Smith (5) 62,335.00
  *
Timothy R. Chrisman (6) 49,178.00
  *
David A. Ederer (7) 34,448.60
  *
Rose Marie David (8) 19,281.00
  *
Scott M. Boggs (9) 16,430.40
  *
Thomas E. King (10) 15,381.00
  *
George “Judd” Kirk (11) 14,276.40
  *
Melba Bartels (12) 12,400.00
  *
Victor H. Indiek 7,669.57
  *
Donald R. Voss (13) 5,158.00
  *
All executive officers and directors as a group
(22 persons) (14)
 1,899,274.11
  7.59%
Name and Address of Beneficial OwnerAmount and Nature of Beneficial OwnershipPercent of Class
BlackRock, Inc. (1)
55 East 52
nd Street,
New York, NY 10055
2,770,666 14.8 %
Dimensional Fund Advisors LP (2)
6300 Bee Cave Road,
Building One,
Austin, TX 78746
1,605,522 8.6 %
The Vanguard Group (3)
100 Vanguard Blvd.,
Malvern, PA 19355
1,249,994 6.7 %
Mark K. Mason (4)
182,708 1.0 %
Scott M. Boggs (5)
29,782 *
Sandra A. Cavanaugh13,641 *
Jeffrey D. Green (6)
11,686 *
Joanne R. Harrell4,669 *
James R. Mitchell, Jr.9,475 *
Mark R. Patterson (7)
235,359 1.3 %
Nancy D. Pellegrino (8)
9,667 *
John M. Michel (9)
72,526 *
William D. Endresen (10)
15,461 *
Godfrey B. Evans70,379 *
Darrell S. van Amen (11)
82,384 *
All executive officers and directors as a group (17 persons) (12)
858,962 4.6 %
*        less than 1.0%

(1)BlackRock, Inc. stated in its Schedule 13G/A filing with the SEC on January 26, 2023 (the “BlackRock 13G/A filing”) that, of the 2,770,666 shares beneficially owned at December 31, 2022, it has (a) sole voting power with respect to 2,739,806 shares, (b) shared voting power with respect to 0 shares, (c) sole power to dispose of 2,770,666 shares and (d) shared power to dispose of 0 shares. According to the BlackRock 13G/A filing, the address of Black Rock, Inc. is 55 East 52nd Street New York, NY 10055.
(2)Dimensional Fund Advisors LP stated in its Schedule 13G/A filing with the SEC on February 10, 2023 (the “Dimensional 13G/A filing”) that, of the 1,605,522 shares beneficially owned at December 31, 2022, it has (a) sole voting power with respect to 1,582,825 shares, (b) shared voting power with respect to 0 shares, (c) sole power to dispose of 1,605,522 shares and (d) shared power to dispose of 0 shares. According to the Dimensional 13G/A filing, the address of Dimensional Fund Advisors LP is 6300 Bee Cave Road Building One, Austin, TX 78746.
(3)The Vanguard Group stated in its Schedule 13G/A filing with the SEC on February 9, 2023 (the “Vanguard 13G/A filing”) that, of the 1,249,994 shares beneficially owned at December 31, 2022, it has (a) sole voting power with respect to 0 shares, (b) shared voting power with respect to 21,662 shares, (c) sole power to dispose of 1,212,275 shares, and (d) shared power to dispose of 37,719 shares. According to the Vanguard 13G/A filing, the address of The Vanguard Group is 100 Vanguard Blvd., Malvern, PA 19355.
(4)Includes 1,375 shares held by Courtney Mason, Mr. Mason’s spouse. Mr. Mason disclaims beneficial ownership of Ms. Mason’s shares except to the extent of any pecuniary interest he may have therein.
(5)Includes 7,900 shares held jointly with Patricia Boggs, Mr. Boggs’s spouse. 6,400 shares are pledged as collateral in connection with a personal line of credit.
(6)Includes 2,984 shares held jointly with Tracy Green, Mr. Green’s spouse. Also includes 753 shares held by Tracy Green. Mr. Green disclaims beneficial ownership with respect to such shares except to the extent of any pecuniary interest he may have therein.
(7)Includes 217,000 shares held by Mark and Michele Patterson Family Trust U/A dated August 23, 2010; Mr. Patterson and his spouse, Michele Patterson, are co-trustees and beneficiaries and share voting and investment power over the assets of the trust.
(8)Includes 1,000 shares held by Pellegrino Advisory Services LLC, of which Ms. Pellegrino is the principal and beneficial owner.
81


*less than 1.0%
(9)Includes 30,719 shares held by J Michel and R Michel TTEE, The Michel family Tr U/A DTD 6/14/18; Mr. Michel and his spouse, Rosetta Michel, are the co-trustees and beneficiaries of the J Michel and R. Michel Tr U/A DTD 6/14/18. Includes 1,807 shares scheduled to vest within 60 days of March 31, 2023.

(1)Based on Schedule 13G/A filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 26, 2016.
(2)Based on Schedule 13G filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 11, 2016.
(3)Includes 19,252.64(10)Includes 538 shares held through the 401(k) Plan. The 401(k) Plan participants have the authority to direct voting of shares they hold through the 401(k) Plan. Also includes (a) 20,147.2 shares held jointly with Gro A. Buer, Mr. William’s spouse; (b) 20,316 shares held as co-trustee with Ms. Buer for the Marina Sonja Williams Trust dated 12/25/95; (c) 135,000 shares held as sole trustee for Marina S. Williams Trust UA dated 6/27/13; (d) 150,076.8 shares held as executor of the estate of Walter B. Williams; (e) 150,073.6 shares held as executor of the estate of Marie W. Williams; (f) 1.2 shares held as the sole trustee of the Walter B. Williams Interim Trust; (g) 750.4 shares held as the sole trustee for the Andrew Alvaro Mullins-Williams Trust dated 11/29/05, and (h) 0.40 shares held individually by Gro A. Buer.
(4)Includes 237,164 shares held as co-trustee with Tracy Mason, Mr. Mason’s spouse, for the Mason Family Trust dated 2/16/99, options to purchase 242,168 shares of common stock, and 2,780 shares of common stock to be issued on May 29, 2016 upon the partial vesting of a Restricted Stock Unit granted to Mr. Mason on May 29, 2014.
(5)Includes 56,300 shares of common stock held jointly by Ann Smith, Mr. Smith’s spouse.
(6)Includes 12,500 shares owned indirectly through Chrisman & Company, Inc., in which Mr. Chrisman is the sole shareholder.
(7)Includes (a) 1,000 shares held as sole trustee for the Alicia Ruth Apple Trust dated 8/14/1992; (b) 1,000 shares held as sole trustee for Katelyn Jane Apple Trust dated 8/14/1992 and (c) 1,000 shares held as sole trustee for Lucas James Apple Trust dated 8/14/1992.
(8)Includes 3,000 shares held jointly with Don Balalke, Ms. David’s spouse, 3,165 shares of restricted stock subject to vesting on July 25, 2016, and 371 shares of common stock to be issued on May 29, 2016 upon the partial vesting of a Restricted Stock Unit granted to Ms. David on May 29, 2014.
(9)Includes 6,400 shares held jointly with Patricia Boggs, Mr. Boggs’ spouse.
(10)Includes 15,069 shares owned indirectly through the Thomas E. King Living Trust, of which he is the sole trustee and beneficiary.
(11)Includes 6,488.4 shares of common stock held jointly by Barbara Kirk, Mr. Kirk’s spouse.


(12)Represents shares issued pursuant to a restricted stock award subject to a right of forfeiture which lapses ratably over four years on August 3 of each of 2016, 2017, 2018 and 2019.
(13)Includes 1,000 shares held as sole trustee for the Voss Family Trust.
(14)Includes an aggregate of (a) 7,273 shares of common stock to be issued on May 29, 2016 upon the partial vesting of Restricted Stock Units granted on May 29, 2014 (b) 461,167 shares issuable on exercise of options vested as of or within 60 days of April 21, 2016, and (c) 43,564.94 shares held through the 401(k) Plan. Participants in the Company’s 401(k) Plan have the authority to direct voting of shares they hold through the 401(k) Plan.



INFORMATION REGARDING EQUITY COMPENSATION PLANS
The following table gives information about our common stock that may be issued upon the exercise of options, warrants and rights under all of our existing equity compensation plans as of Decemberthe last statement date of March 31, 2015 under the HomeStreet, Inc. 2014 Equity Incentive Plan (“the 2014 Plan”).
Plan Category
(a) Number of
Securities to be
Issued Upon
Exercise of
Outstanding
Options,
Warrants and
Rights
 
(b) Weighted
Average Exercise
Price of
Outstanding
Options,
Warrants, and
Rights
 
(c) Number of
Securities
Remaining
Available for
Future Issuance
Under Equity
Compensation
Plans (Excluding
Securities Reflected
in Column (a))
 
       
Plans approved by shareholders697,965 
(1) 
 $11.97
 
(2) 
682,058 
(3)(4) 
Plans not approved by shareholders (5)
15,600 
(5) 
 $0.97
  N/A  
Total713,565   $11.65
  682,058  

(1)Consists of 525,317 shares subject to option grants awarded pursuant to the HomeStreet, Inc. 2010 Equity Incentive Plan (“the 2010 Plan”), 63,945 shares subject to Restricted Stock Units awarded under the 2014 Plan and 108,703 shares issuable under Performance Share Units awarded under the 2014 Plan, assuming maximum performance goals are met under such awards, resulting in the issuance of the maximum number of shares allowed under those awards.
(2)Shares issued on vesting of Restricted Stock Units and Performance Share Units under the 2014 Plan are done without payment by the participant of any additional consideration and therefore have been excluded from this calculation. The weighted average exercise price reflects only the exercise price of the options issued under the 2010 Plan that are still outstanding as of the date of this table.
(3)Consists of shares remaining available for issuance under the 2014 Plan.
(4)The 2010 Plan was terminated when the 2014 Plan was approved by our shareholders on May 29, 2014. While the terms of the 2010 Plan remain in effect for any awards issued under that plan that are still outstanding, new awards may not be granted under the 2010 Plan.
(5)Consists of retention equity awards granted in 2010 outside of the 2010 Plan but subject to its terms and conditions.


AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT
As more fully described in the Audit Committee Charter, the Audit Committee is responsible for overseeing HomeStreet’s accounting and financial reporting processes, including the quarterly reviews and the annual audit of HomeStreet’s consolidated financial statements by HomeStreet’s independent registered public accounting firm. Deloitte & Touche, LLP served as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm in during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015 and has conducted the audit of HomeStreet’s financial statements for 2015. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 requires the Audit Committee to be directly responsible for the appointment, compensation and oversight of the audit work of the independent registered public accounting firm. As part of fulfilling its responsibilities, the Audit Committee has:
reviewed and discussed the Company’s audited financial statements with management;
discussed with the independent registered public accounting firm the matters required to be discussed by Statement on Auditing Standards No. 16 (Communication With Audit Committees);
received the written disclosures and the letter from the independent registered public accounting firm required by Rule 3526 (Communication with Audit Committees Concerning Independence) of the PCAOB; and
discussed with the independent registered public accounting firm that firm’s independence.
Based on its review and discussions, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board that the audited consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015 be included2023. Participants in the Company’s 2015 Annual Report on Form 10-K filed401(k) Plan have the authority to direct voting of shares they hold through the 401(k) Plan.
(11)Includes 3,000 shares owned by Jeannie van Amen, Mr. van Amen’s spouse. Mr. van Amen disclaims beneficial ownership with respect to such shares except to the SEC.extent of any pecuniary interest he may have therein.
Submitted(12)Includes shares held by our Directors and NEOs as well as our five other executive officers. For our five other executive officers, includes 5,004 shares were held through the Audit Committee401(k) Plan as of the Boardlast statement date of DirectorsMarch 31, 2023. Participants in the Company’s 401(k) Plan have the authority to direct voting of HomeStreet, Inc.shares they hold through the 401(k) Plan.
Scott M. Boggs, Chair
Douglas I. Smith
82


Donald R. Voss
Bruce W. Williams




OTHER MATTERS
The Board is not awareParticipants in the Solicitation
Under applicable regulations of any business to come before the Annual MeetingSEC, each of our directors and certain of our executive officers and other employees are “participants” in this proxy solicitation. For more information about our directors and executive officers, please see “Principal Shareholders” on page 80 of this Proxy Statement and “Proposal 1 — Election of Directors” on page 12 of this Proxy Statement. Other than those mattersthe persons described in this Proxy Statement.Statement, no regular employees of the Company have been or are to be employed to solicit shareholders in connection with this proxy solicitation. However, in the course of their regular duties, employees may be asked to perform clerical or ministerial tasks in furtherance of this solicitation.
Costs of Solicitation
We are required by law to convene an annual meeting of shareholders at which directors are elected. Because our shares are widely held, it would be impractical for our shareholders to meet physically in sufficient numbers to hold a meeting. Accordingly, the Company is soliciting proxies from our shareholders. The Company will bear the expenses of calling and holding the Annual Meeting and the solicitation of proxies on behalf of our Board with respect to the Annual Meeting. These costs will include, among other items, the expense of preparing, assembling, printing and mailing the proxy materials to shareholders of record and beneficial owners, and reimbursements paid to brokers, banks and other nominees for their reasonable out-of-pocket expenses for forwarding proxy materials to shareholders and obtaining voting instructions from beneficial owners. In addition to soliciting proxies by mail, directors, officers and employees may solicit proxies on behalf of our Board, without additional compensation, personally or by telephone. We may also solicit proxies by email from shareholders who are our employees or who previously requested to receive proxy materials electronically. Excluding the salaries and wages of our regular employees, we have not incurred, and do not expect to incur, expenses related to our solicitation of proxies.
Shareholders Sharing the Same Address
SEC rules permit us to deliver only one copy of our proxy materials to multiple shareholders of record who share the same address and have the same last name, unless we have received contrary instructions from one or more of the shareholders. This delivery method, called “householding,” reduces our printing and mailing costs. Shareholders who participate in householding will continue to receive separate proxy cards.
If you are a shareholder of record who currently receives a single copy of our proxy materials and wishes to receive a separate copy of our proxy materials or if anyyou are currently receiving multiple copies of our proxy materials at the same address and wish to receive only a single copy, please write to the Secretary of the Company at HomeStreet, Inc. 601 Union Street, Suite 2000, Seattle, WA 98101 or call at (206) 389-7773.
Beneficial owners sharing an address who are currently receiving multiple copies of our proxy materials and wish to receive only a single copy in the future, or who currently receive a single copy and wish to receive separate copies in the future, should contact their bank, broker or other matters should properly come beforenominee to request that only a single copy or separate copies, as the case may be, be delivered to all shareholders at the shared address in the future.
Appraisal Rights
Holders of shares of common stock do not have appraisal rights under Washington law in connection with this proxy solicitation.
Shareholder List
A list of our shareholders as of the close of business on March 31, 2023 will be available for inspection during business hours for 10 days prior to the Annual Meeting at our principal executive offices located at 601
83


Union Street, Suite 2000, Seattle, WA 98101. This list will also be accessible during the Annual Meeting through the meeting it is intended that proxieswebsite www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/HMST2023.
Shareholders Proposals and Director Nominations for the 2024 Annual Meeting
For inclusion in HomeStreet’s proxy materials:To be considered for inclusion in the accompanying formproxy materials for next year’s annual meeting of shareholders (the “2024 Annual Meeting”) under Rule 14a-8 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), proposals must be received by our Corporate Secretary no later than December 16, 2023, and must comply will all applicable requirements of Rule 14a-8 of the Exchange Act.
To be voted in respect thereofbrought before an annual meeting of shareholders: In addition, our Bylaws establish an advance notice procedure for shareholders who wish to present certain matters before an annual meeting of shareholders.
In general, nominations for the election of directors may be made (1) by or at the direction of the Board, or (2) by a shareholder of the Company entitled to vote at such meeting who has delivered written notice to our Corporate Secretary at our principal executive offices within the Notice Period (as defined below), who was a shareholder at the time of such notice and as of the Record Date, and whose notice is in accordance with the judgmentprocedures set forth in our Bylaws.
Our Bylaws also provide that the only business that may be conducted at an annual meeting is business that is specified in the notice of meeting given by or at the direction of the Board, (2) properly brought before the meeting by or at the direction of the Board or (3) properly brought before the meeting by a shareholder who has delivered written notice to our Corporate Secretary at our principal executive offices within the Notice Period (as defined below), who was a shareholder at the time of such notice and as of the Record Date, and whose notice complies with our Bylaws.
Except as otherwise provided by law, our Articles of Incorporation, or our Bylaws, the Chairman of the meeting shall have the power and duty to determine whether a nomination or any business proposed to be brought before the meeting was made or proposed, as the case may be, in compliance with our Bylaws, and if any proposed nomination or business is not in compliance with our Bylaws, to declare that such proposal or nomination shall be disregarded.
The “Notice Period” is defined as that period not earlier than 5:00 pm Pacific Time on the 120 day and not later than 5:00 pm Pacific Time on the 90th day prior to the first anniversary of the preceding year’s annual meeting. As a result, the Notice Period for the 2024 annual meeting of shareholders will start on January 26, 2024 and end on February 23, 2024. Our Bylaws contain different notice submission date requirements in the event our annual meeting is held more than 30 days before or 60 days after May 25, 2024.
In addition, shareholders who intend to solicit proxies in support of director nominees other than the Company’s nominees must comply with the additional requirements of Rule 14a-19(b).
If a shareholder who has notified the Company of his or her intention to appear in person or persons votingby a representative at the proxies.meeting to propose the business specified in the notice at an annual meeting of shareholders does not appear to present his or her proposal at such meeting, the Company need not present the proposal for vote at such meeting.
IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THE AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALSA copy of the full text of our Bylaws may be obtained by writing to our Corporate Secretary at our principal executive offices or by accessing our filings on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov.
The Company’s 2015 Annual Report onAvailability of the Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015 (the “2015 Annual Report”), including financial statements, is being mailed to shareholders with this Proxy Statement. Additional copiesand Other Filings
Copies of the 20152022 Annual Report may be obtained without charge by writing to Investor Relations, HomeStreet, Inc., 601 Union Street, Suite 2000, Seattle, Washington 98101. This Proxy Statement, the 20152022 Annual Report and other proxy materials are also available on HomeStreet’swww.proxyvote.com and on the following cookies-free website that can be accessed anonymously at www.homestreet.com/proxy. In accordance with SEC rules, our proxy materials posted on this website do not contain any cookies or other tracking features.http://ir.homestreet.com/sec-filings/proxy-materials/default.aspx. The SEC maintains a website located at www.sec.gov that also contains this information. The information on HomeStreet’s website and the SEC’s website are not part of this Proxy Statement.









HOMESTREET, INC. SHAREHOLDERS MEETING
DRIVING INSTRUCTIONS & DIRECTIONS FOR PARKING IN UNION SQUARE GARAGE


84


Meeting Location:

Hilton Seattle
1301 6th Avenue
Seattle, WA 98101
Tel: 206-624-0500
THE PROXY STATEMENT FOR THE ANNUAL MEETING AND THE ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2022 (AND ANY AMENDMENT THERETO) ARE
AVAILABLE FREE OF CHARGE ON OUR WEBSITE AT 
WWW.HOMESTREET.COM
From I-5 Southbound:WE ENCOURAGE YOU TO VOTE ELECTRONICALLY OVER THE INTERNET OR BY CALLING THE TOLL-FREE NUMBER (FOR RESIDENTS OF THE UNITED STATES AND CANADA) LISTED ON YOUR PROXY CARD. PLEASE HAVE YOUR PROXY CARD IN HAND WHEN GOING ONLINE OR CALLING. IF YOU AUTHORIZE YOUR PROXY ELECTRONICALLY OVER THE INTERNET OR BY CALLING THE TOLL-FREE NUMBER, YOU DO NOT NEED TO RETURN YOUR PROXY CARD. IF YOU CHOOSE TO AUTHORIZE YOUR PROXY BY MAIL, COMPLETE, DATE, SIGN AND RETURN YOUR PROXY CARD IN THE POSTAGE PRE-PAID ENVELOPE THAT WAS ENCLOSED WITH YOUR PROXY MATERIALS.
Take
Forward-Looking Statements
This Proxy Statement contains forward-looking statements within the Union Street exit, (exit 165b)
Turn left on Seventh Avenue (first light at the endmeaning of Section 27A of the Union Street exit ramp)Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), Section 21E of the Exchange Act and the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. All statements relating to events or results that may occur in the future, including, but not limited to, the Company’s future costs of solicitation, record or meeting dates, compensation arrangements or structure, Board composition, future shareholder engagement and the Company’s strategy, and underlying assumptions of any of the foregoing are forward-looking statements.
Seventh Avenue runsWhen used in this Proxy Statement, terms such as “anticipates,” “believes,” “continue,” “could,” “estimates,” “expects,” “intends,” “may,” “plans,” “potential,” “predicts,” “should” or “will” or the negative of those terms or other comparable terms are intended to identify forward-looking statements. These statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause us to fall short of our expectations or may cause us to deviate from our current plans, as expressed or implied by these statements. The known risks that could cause our results to differ, or may cause us to take actions that are not currently planned or expected, are described in the Company’s reports and filings with the SEC including, without limitation, the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2022, under the Union Square buildingsheading Part I, Item 1A — “Risk Factors.” Unless required by law, the Company does not intend, and the garage entrance is mid-block on the right sideundertakes no obligation, to update or publicly release any revision to any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of the street.
From I-5 Northbound:
Takereceipt of new information, the Seneca Street exit, (exit 165),occurrence of subsequent events, the change of circumstance or otherwise. Each forward-looking statement contained in this Proxy Statement is specifically qualified in its entirety by the aforementioned factors. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on the left sidethese forward-looking statements, which apply only as of the freeway.date of this Proxy Statement.
Turn right onto Sixth Avenue (first light at

85




APPENDIX A — NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES
In this Proxy Statement, we use the endfollowing non-GAAP measures: (1) tangible common equity and tangible assets, as we believe this information is consistent with the treatment by bank regulatory agencies, which exclude intangible assets from the calculation of capital ratios; and (2) an efficiency ratio, which is the ratio of noninterest expenses to the sum of net interest income and noninterest income, excluding certain items of income or expense and excluding taxes incurred and payable to the State of Washington as such taxes are not classified as income taxes and we believe including them in noninterest expenses impacts the comparability of our results to those companies whose operations are in states where assessed taxes on business are classified as income taxes. We believe that these non-GAAP financial measures, when taken together with the corresponding GAAP financial measures, provide meaningful supplemental information regarding our performance by providing additional information used by management that is not otherwise required by GAAP or other applicable requirements. Our management uses, and believes that investors benefit from referring to, these non-GAAP financial measures in assessing our operating results and when planning, forecasting and analyzing future periods. These non-GAAP financial measures also facilitate a comparison of our performance to prior periods. We believe these measures are frequently used by securities analysts, investors and other parties in the evaluation of companies in our industry. These non-GAAP financial measures should be considered in addition to, not as a substitute for or superior to, financial measures prepared in accordance with GAAP. In the information below, we have provided reconciliations of, where applicable, the most comparable GAAP financial measures to the non-GAAP measures used in this Proxy Statement, or the calculation of the Seneca Street exit ramp)non-GAAP financial measure.
Turn right at University Street ( be careful to stay left
A-1


 As of or For the Year Ended
(in thousands, except share and per share data) December 31,
2022
December 31,
2021
December 31,
2020
Tangible book value per share
Shareholders’ equity$562,147 $715,339 $717,750 
Less: Goodwill and other intangibles(29,980)(31,709)(32,880)
Tangible shareholders’ equity$532,167 $683,630 $684,870 
Common shares outstanding18,730,380 20,085,336 21,796,904 
Computed amount$28.41 $34.04 $31.42 
Return on average assets
Average assets$8,396,078 $7,318,505 $7,250,634 
Net income$66,540 $115,422 $79,990 
Adjustment (tax effected)
Gain on sale of branches(3,356)— — 
Tangible income applicable to shareholders$63,184 $115,422 $79,990 
Ratio0.75 %1.6 %1.1 %
Return on average tangible equity
Average shareholders’ equity$617,469 $725,802 $706,160 
Less: Average goodwill and other intangibles(30,930)(32,337)(33,613)
Average tangible equity$586,539 $693,465 $672,547 
Net income$66,540 $115,422 $79,990 
Adjustments (tax effected)
Gain on sale of branches(3,356)— — 
Amortization of core deposit intangibles751 923 1,082 
Tangible income applicable to shareholders$63,935 $116,345 $81,072 
Ratio10.9 %16.8 %12.1 %
Efficiency ratio
Noninterest expense
Total$205,419 
Adjustments:
State of Washington taxes(2,311)
Adjusted total$203,108 
Total revenues
Net interest income$233,307 
Noninterest income51,570 
Gain on sale of branches(4,270)
Adjusted total$280,607 
Ratio72.4 %
A-2


Capture.gif
Important Notice Regarding the Availability of the concrete divider that separates the two-lane access road around the Union Square complex from the freeway on-ramp)
University Street curves and becomes Seventh Avenue. LookProxy Materials for the sign indicating the parking garage entrance on the left side of the street.Annual Meeting: The Form 10-K and Notice and Proxy Statement
Once You are in the Garage:
Try to find parking in the WEST section of the garage, near the One Union Square elevator on any level. (One Union & Two Union Square share underground parking. WEST parking in the vicinity of a One Union Square elevator will be closer to the Hilton.)



Look for overhead signs in the garage directing you to WEST or One Union Square elevators.
Take the elevator to the Lobby.
Once You Reach the Lobby:
Exit the elevator and take the down escalators directly ahead. At the bottom of the escalators you will see another elevator on your left that will take you up to the Hilton Lobby. The meeting will be held in the Windward Room on the lobby level of the Hilton.
Parking Validation
Please bring your Union Square garage entrance ticket to the meeting and we will be happy to validate your parking before you leave. NOTE: We will not be validating Hilton parking.










Capture 1.gif